Cycling Cynics

NeilG83 · 2012-10-18T15:23:14+01:00

I was reading an article last night on cyclismas.com that was full of errors and speculation. I didn't know if I should laugh at the terrible writing or be angry at the rumours it was trying to spread (BTW I am aware that it is a satirical website, but the article was definitely meant to be serious). I was wondering how many Road.cc users visit the cyclismas or similar websites or follow some of the more outspoken cynics on Twitter. Is it good to have people that ask difficult questions or do they do more harm than good?

This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by Raleigh.

Creator

Topic
October 18, 2012 at 3:23 pm #17077

NeilG83

I was reading an article last night on cyclismas.com that was full of errors and speculation. I didn’t know if I should laugh at the terrible writing or be angry at the rumours it was trying to spread (BTW I am aware that it is a satirical website, but the article was definitely meant to be serious).
I was wondering how many Road.cc users visit the cyclismas or similar websites or follow some of the more outspoken cynics on Twitter.
Is it good to have people that ask difficult questions or do they do more harm than good?
Creator

Topic

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Sort:

Author

Replies
October 19, 2012 at 11:00 am #704175
0

Raleigh

cyclismas:
Quote:A fresh
cyclismas:

A fresh take on cycling satire and commentary from a merry band of misfits

What were you really expecting?

October 19, 2012 at 3:17 am #704173
0

mpt68

i think a lot of the stuff on
i think a lot of the stuff on the site is tongue in cheek and you have to take it as that.
most of the time it is just trying to get a response out of people
Author

Replies

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.