Why do riders refuse to use cycle paths?

Viewing 2 replies - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #660177
    0
    Simon E

    “Exeter’s answer to Jeremy
    “Exeter’s answer to Jeremy Clarkson”. Enough said.

    The worst bit is that billious, ignorant, self-serving crap as this will allow the small-minded dickheads who read it to think they are given license abuse and threaten anyone on a bicycle.

    There is a simple reason: cycle paths can occasionally be pleasant to ride on but a lot of the time they are NOT.

    Some pedestrians appear to deliberately choose to walk on the ‘cycle lane’ side of a shared path. I often wonder whether it’s deliberately done to annoy cyclists, start an argument or simply that they’re stupid and spend the whole time staring pathetically at their mobile phone.

    Then there are the dog walkers with retractable leads. The leads, the owners and the dogs themselves can each be a menace, and on top of that you get to ride through or swerve round the dog sh*t.

    Some people think it’s fine to park their car or van illegally on a pavement or cyclepath because it’s 10 yards nearer to their destination than where they can park legally.

    Cycle paths are not salted in winter and often don’t drain well when it rains. In Autumn one near my house gets covered in several places by piles of fallen beech leaves. When wet these are a real hazard. After the windy week we’ve had I expect the same stretch to have a large number of fallen branches too.

    And let’s not forget the broken bottles, wires and goodness knows what else on the track: http://road.cc/49882

    If you’re not swerving parked vehicles, dog poo, posts and drains then you are confronted by ‘Cyclists Dismount’ signs at every dropped kerb you reach. Stop, start, stop, start…. That is, until the cycle route suddenly disappears at a junction, where the road narrows, or the pavement ends so you’re having to hop into the road (quite possibly on the wrong side) or walk. Grrrrr!

    #660175
    0
    PeteH

    There’s a “cycle path” close
    There’s a “cycle path” close to home that I could use, runs along the side of a country “A” road so in theory would be an attractive option. However:

    – its other name is “the pavement”, so straight away you’re sharing with any pedestrians (or more likely runners) who happen to be around
    – the state of the tarmac is atrocious and does not appear to undergo maintenance.
    – there’s always glass on it…can never fathom how it gets there, but its there

    so I take my chances on the road. Not pleasant being passed by a Tesco lorry doing 60mph, but there you go.

    My experience also of the cycle lanes in London is that in general there is so much ironwork that in the wet they are treacherous (not to mention bumpy in any weather).

    These things are great ideas but as usual in this country the implementation is all screwed up.

    I was at first tempted to say that the guy writing this blog is an idiot. Except he’s not, really. Everything he says [i]should be[/i] correct. But he [i]is[/i] ignorant of just how impractical these “facilities” can be.

Viewing 2 replies - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.