- This topic has 27 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by
wyadvd.
-
CreatorTopic
-
October 21, 2011 at 7:42 pm #14390
paulfg42
I usually have my lights on constant. However, I’ve noticed quite a lot of cyclists use flashing lights.
Which do you prefer and why?
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
wyadvd
interesting article re
interesting article re flashing lights. An americanstudy has clearly shown that stationary emergency vehicles covered in flashing lights are more likely to be run into by drunk and distracted drivers than just steady red lights alone (especially at night and in fog)wyadvd
exposure maxxd on front,
exposure maxxd on front, dinotte 300r on rear. NEVER EVER use flash. I’d rather be mistaken for a slow motorcycle than a fast cyclist due to most motorist’s neuroses around cyclists, which frequently endanger me. Ive never understood why cyclists feel the need to be positively identified as such???duhhh??
Simon E
I’d suggest that for the rear
I’d suggest that for the rear a steady plus a small(er) flasher is ideal, particularly if the flasher can be mounted high up (rucksack/helmet) so the rider is visible in a line of traffic. If used at the same level I’m not sure it would add much benefit over just the steady light. Flash-only in busy town traffic risks being missed except on quieter routes.At the front the best option may vary depending whether you are on streetlit or unlit roads. I’d suggest that a wide beam or a light with good side spill plus a flasher is useful in town, whereas out in the countryside you want adequate illumination on the path in front of you. A secondary consequence of this will be a steady, bright light source for oncoming traffic to see clearly.
For time trials a flashing rear light is the best option. Cateye LD600 and RSP Astrum are bright enough to stand out well in daylight, while on the front my diminutive Electron Backupz unit helps on dull days and where there is some tree cover. A time triallist will have a considerably smaller profile – both front and rear – than the typical sit-up-and-beg commuter.
arrieredupeleton
You can’t have enough lights
You can’t have enough lights (mix of flashing and constant). So far Kirky and Giff77 both have a total of 6.For the record I use 2 on the front (one flashing, one constant); 2 on my helmet; and 2 on the rear (one flashing, one constant). Come to think of it, I use the Aldi hi viz ankle straps with red LEDS in, so if I was particularly conscientious I would have 8.
Anyone use more?
Napalmhaze
Super bright front flashers
Super bright front flashers are in my opinion dangerous. Especially to other cyclists. When I’m cycling during rush hour, the most distracting thing I find is other cyclists lights. They don’t make you more visible, they make you annoying, distracting and difficult to actually gauge your position.If you must have a flasher to compliment your steady lights at night then use something like the Knog Frog or other such emergency lights.
While I’m at it, this lumens race has gotten out of hand. Thank you magicshine et al. These beams are not designed for the road and are blinding. That makes you as visible as a welder, yeah sure I can see you, but its burning my eyes out. I shouted at several people on the cycle track recently for having their uber-lumen lights aimed right at my face.
monty dog
There’s a reason emergency
There’s a reason emergency vehicles have flashing lights – I always have rear on flash. I don’t care about the British Standard as it was written by a committee whose primary interests are the sale of batteries and lights, not whether it is the most visible or not.Kirky
I use two up front, one on
I use two up front, one on constant and one on strobe. On the rear I have 4, 3 on flash and one main on constant.Let’s hope this keeps Kirky safe!
giff77
3 on back (one flashing) 3 on
3 on back (one flashing) 3 on front all constant. Personally I hate cycling towards a very bright flashing white light. But must agree, a flashing red draws your attention to the cyclist in front. The Highway Code is quite specific regards lights on a bike regards intensity etc. And plod if he was going totally by the book would be quite happy to slap a fp on you if there wasn’t a constant light. Though, most don’t give a rip, just as long as you are lit 🙂 Mind you, they don’t give a rip if you have no lights, at least up where I stay this seems to be the case.paulfg42
paulfg42 wrote:Ordered the
paulfg42 wrote:Ordered the Exposure Flare rear light and will flash and be constant simultaneously!That little baby sure is bright!
FMOAB
The emergency services use
The emergency services use flashing lights to attract the attention of motorists. If it works for them, it’s good enough for me.mypeloton
Personally I go for a good
Personally I go for a good light to cover seeing and being seen on the front then at the rear a bright, fixed light attached to the bike and flashing B&M Topfire lights in the helmet vents. The Topfire lights aren’t REALLY bright but enough just to draw attention to you. After buying a rear light from Bike24 I thought it was odd that it didnt have a flashing function but it turns out in Germany (who have some of the strictest cycle light regulations in the World) that flashing rear lights are illegal!OldRidgeback
I use a single constant at
I use a single constant at the front and a single flashing at the rear – maybe I should have more. Good thing LED lights is you can dress your bike up like a Christmas tree and they still weigh less than the old skool things I grew up with as a nipper and had on my much missed Falcon Black Diamond – nostalgia, who needs it?andyp
‘And a bike is the only
‘And a bike is the only vehicle allowed a flashing red light, so it immediately says “bike in front”. That identification is crucial, since the driver is going to have to brake or overtake pretty soon whatever. ‘that one is such a comedy argument. Presumably said driver would just drive straight into the back of anything showing a constant light, because they wouldn’t need to brake or overtake? 😉
Crankwinder
I mostly use a hub-dynamos
I mostly use a hub-dynamos (because I like to switch both lights on whenever, e.g. for dark underpasses or when low sun dazzles following drivers) so my rearlight is steady, since that’s the only game in dynamotown.But when I have to ride a toy-bike in the dark, I set the rear battery lamp to flash.
My thinking is that the main point of a rearlamp on a bike is to grab attention, and it’s plain obvious that flashing does that better, otherwise turn indicators, emergency vehicles, road works, etc. wouldn’t do that.
And a bike is the only vehicle allowed a flashing red light, so it immediately says “bike in front”. That identification is crucial, since the driver is going to have to brake or overtake pretty soon whatever.
Gauging the distance to that bike comes last of all and there are lots of other visual clues to do that better than binocular vision on a little red spot.
Contrary to popular belief, people do not become invisible the moment they straddle a bike. And cars have headlights that even on dip are perfectly adequate for a driver to see how big and hence how far away a cyclist is – once his attention has been grabbed to actually look in that direction.
I do also drive by the way, at least once a week, and have never had any difficulty seeing a cyclist or a pedestrian that I’m actually looking at. The trouble on our roads is that so few drivers are really looking out for people. I think I’ve talked myself into adding a battery flasher to my dyno bikes!
mr-andrew
Flashing.
I really noticed
Flashing.I really noticed what a difference it makes cycling behind the wife who was using constant. Nowhere near as visible imo
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.