preferred-google-button
log in
register

Bike fitting service – No measuring involved?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • March 10, 2011 at 11:11 am #13196
    Bom W

    Hello,

    I’m fairly new to road cycling and have been making do since last year with an old vintage frame, albeit with great Campag gear, but I decided I needed something new.

    I visited my LBS and spoke to them about potential bikes and arranged to return to have a bike fitting.
    I was told that the guy who was qualified to use the equipment would measure me up and tell me what size bike I’d need. This would cost me £40 but be taken off the price of the bike.

    When I went in he sat me on a 57cm frame and got me pedalling on a turbo trainer. It felt ok on the 57, but after a while I felt that there was a bit of tension below my shoulders and after a bit of chat he decided I probably needed a 60cm frame. The sizing of the particular bike goes from 57 to 60cm.

    His rational, was that on a 60cm frame I’d have more range of adjustment whereas I was at the maximum limit on the 57cm.

    I asked him if I needed to be measured, but he said he could do a better job visually.

    My concern is that I’ve ordered a 60cm bike (should pick it up next week)but never actually sat on one that size and I’m relying totally on the guy’s expertise.

    I’d appreciate some advice as to if this is normal or not. Bottom line is that if I’m not happy when I collect it I’ll be demanding they get me the 57cm but it’ll mean another two to three weeks waiting.

    Thanks.

  • Creator
    Topic
Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • March 10, 2011 at 3:41 pm #641531
    0
    Bom W

    Thanks Dave and Stato, that
    Thanks Dave and Stato, that sort of goes with what the guy was saying.

    Because I’ve got a long back he was suggesting that the 60 would allow raising the stem if I was uncomfortable, whereas the 57 wouldn’t go any higher.

    You’ve put my mind at rest and I’m looking forward to picking the bike up. Just struck me as odd that he didn’t use the measuring kit and charge me?

    March 10, 2011 at 3:31 pm #641529
    0
    STATO

    Well a 60 is only 3cm longer
    Well a 60 is only 3cm longer and prob only 1cm higher at the headtube? so if you felt tension (cramped?) on a 57 then a 60 might be better. Im 6ft4 and my bike measures 57cm toptube (60cm seattube tho) and i used a 140mm stem!

    March 10, 2011 at 3:15 pm #641527
    0
    dave atkinson

    hm, difficult to say. given
    hm, difficult to say. given that you’re quite tall and proportionally your legs aren’t that long, given the choice of a 57 or 60, on paper i’d say 60 to give yourself the reach. but if it was 58 or 60 i’d probably say 58 🙂

    I’m a 59. it’s hard being a 59. No-one makes a 59 😐

    March 10, 2011 at 1:44 pm #641525
    0
    Bom W

    Dave,
    My height is 6’2″ and
    Dave,

    My height is 6’2″ and inseam is 33″ or 84cm.

    March 10, 2011 at 1:14 pm #641523
    0
    dave atkinson

    out of interest, what’s
    out of interest, what’s your:

    a) height
    b) inseam measurement

    ?

    March 10, 2011 at 11:48 am #641521
    0
    suffolkcycles

    Seems a bit odd that they’d
    Seems a bit odd that they’d charge for something this basic. Did he do any analysis of the length of crank arm, position of your knee relative to the pedals, length of stem, width of bars etc?

    It’s tricky to comment without actually seeing what he did. Frame size is generally (huge generalisation, but for these purposes bear with me) a description of the length of the seat tube. The fact that you are getting tension in the shoulders might be more to do with the ‘reach’ of the bike. A 57cm frame with a slightly longer stem might be all you need.

    Anecdotally, having chatted with the Garmin-Cervelo team mechanic, I know that the pros often have a frame one size too small so that they can get the aggressive position they favour with a higher seatpost and low handlebars. Not for the average punter though!

    Have you actually paid for the 60cm one or are they just getting it in for you to try?

    Check out this Leonard Zinn article:

    http://velonews.competitor.com/2011/01/bikes-tech/technical-faq-with-lennard-zinn-lz-suggest-some-new-years-resolutions-for-the-bike-industry_154565

    That said, getting a proper fitting would usually cost slightly north of £100 and in most shops it is not charged if you buy the bike, so the £40 seems a bit low.

    If you are concerned, I’d definitely recommend getting a proper fitting done. Lots of places do them and a quick search on Google – “bike fitting london” (if you live in London) will come up with the top people in the trade there.

  • Author
    Replies
Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.