log in
register

Police Scotland – Leading by example?

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • October 30, 2019 at 2:38 pm #951619
    0
    mdavidford

    Quote:

    ”His focus was on the primary hazard – the cyclist”

     

    Hmm – I’d say the primary hazard was the car, or rather, the guy driving it.

    October 29, 2019 at 8:57 pm #951617
    0
    Anonymous

    If that had been the MET, the

    If that had been the MET, the tape no doubt would have been ‘lost’, if the MET had rammed a cyclist in a well lit street killing them in the process and driving on without a bye or leave, they wouldn’t have charged their driver either, natch.

    Amazing the difference between two forces and hopefully a lesson for all drivers, you could think that the 6 points is a bit high given that they were clearly focused on giving the cyclist a load of room and took their eyes off the ball elsewhere but if that was a pedestrian refuge with someone standing there it could easily have been a fatality.

    We can only hope that the punishment for that level of driving is meted out to all but it’s doubtful.

    October 26, 2019 at 10:56 am #951615
    0
    Spangly Shiny

    At least the traffic light

    At least the traffic light wasn’t red.

  • Author
    Replies
Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.