- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 2 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Shame, looks like a fair
Shame, looks like a fair amount of work into producing an anti-climatic oddity.
Would love to see some company innovate the trainer so you can properly sprint and climb out of the saddle with the natural movement you get on the road. Guess that’s quite some way away yet. Who would get suckered into this when you could buy a far better (in nearly every metric), top-of-the-range model from one of the big players at way less..
£3000 or very nearly that!
£3000 or very nearly that!
Its so tall, aesthetically, looks very ‘knocked up design in my shed’
Last comment from reviewer
“An engineering masterpiece, although technically dated, that you’ll need deep pockets to afford”
Many more trainers better spec and less than a 1/3 of the cost. Kickr, Neo etc