“a lesson for reckless Bedford cyclists” – W.T.F!

Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #889971
    0
    ri9rashed

     

     

    It will be an extra burden on the head. Besides, an uneasy feeling will discourage riders. This decision can’t be appreciated.

    #889969
    0
    Anonymous

    What an idiot. Managed to

    What an idiot. Managed to victim blame himself.

    How exactly are you reckless if you don’t cycle in a reckless manner? You become reckless when somebody else recklessly hits you but you don’t have a helmet? Is that right? Is this really what he’s saying?

     

    #889967
    0
    Beatnik69

    His helmet couldn’t have been

    His helmet couldn’t have been that evffective or he wouldn’t have that massive cut above his eye. Possibly not wearing the helmet tight enough or pushed back on his head?

    #889965
    0
    riotgibbon

    being hit by 5 tonne vehicle

    being hit by 5 tonne vehicle – TOP BANTZ!!

     

     

    #889963
    0
    HowardR

    I’m a little suprised that

    I’m a little suprised that the imperative for all cyclists to wear a high vis tabbard or three didn’t get slipped in somewhere.

    #889961
    0
    ChrisB200SX

    Unprofessional by all

    Unprofessional by all involved. Opportunity missed to highlight road danger reduction. Nevermind being hit by a van, wear a plastic hat!

Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.