New chain advice

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #26243
    woakesd

    I’ve got a new chain for my bike and it is covered in what I assume is grease that will attract dirt.

    Does anyone clean this off and relube?

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 35 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #877835
    0
    leqin
    allanj wrote:
    I remember asking a question about chain cleaning and maintenance on this site once.

     

    It degenerated a bit then as well (though my question was very reasonable ), I’ve just about recovered.

     

    Several similar threads later it looks like little has changed- why does this make people so irate?

     

    Unfortunatly – a little bit like the helmet and disc brake debacles and, to a lesser degree, sock height – chain lubrication is a religion… or is it a dog poo and you stepped in it.

    #877833
    0
    StraelGuy

    I always clean it off. It’s

    I always clean it off. It’s very similar to cosmoline which is used to protect military materiel from mositure in storage. It’s horrid stuff for attracting grit from the road.

    #877831
    0
    userfriendly

    gunswick wrote:

    gunswick wrote:
    Has anyone tried using a chain bath to APPLY lube? Obviously wash and dry first so no degreaser in there! I’m thinking for something like Squirt and other wax based where the advice is to coat the chain and not wipe off the excess (that’s what Squirt’s packaging says!). I wonder if it would help really drive the lube into the rollers?

    It may be what the packaging says, but if you don’t wipe it off you have a lot more stuff to brush off. Also sticks to your cassette and chainrings.

    The important bit to be lubed is the inside of the chain, not the outside. And for that, some heat and multiple passes for the first application works perfectly.

    But what do I know, I’ve only been using Squirt for over a year now over thousands of miles in all sorts of conditions. 😀

    #877829
    0
    dottigirl
    matthewn5 wrote:
    gunswick wrote:
    Has anyone tried using a chain bath to APPLY lube? Obviously wash and dry first so no degreaser in there! I’m thinking for something like Squirt and other wax based where the advice is to coat the chain and not wipe off the excess (that’s what Squirt’s packaging says!). I wonder if it would help really drive the lube into the rollers?

    Yes, an experiment that I will not repeat. It puts far too much lube on and I spent weeks with it dribbling out everywhere and having to be wiped down again.

     

    That’s partially what did with the Muc-Off spray dry lube – it was getting everywhere (and I mean EVERYWHERE) when I tried spraying it on the chain in situ. So I took it off, cleaned it in white spirit, dried it, then put it in a bag and sprayed inside until it was covered.

    Unfortunately, I forgot about it, and by the time I took the chain out, something weird had happened and it was like the whole chain was covered in a layer of the stickiest sticky glue. I couldn’t wipe any of it off as everything I used just stuck to the chain. Useless. Had to clean it all again.

    #877827
    0
    matthewn5

    gunswick wrote:

    gunswick wrote:
    Has anyone tried using a chain bath to APPLY lube? Obviously wash and dry first so no degreaser in there! I’m thinking for something like Squirt and other wax based where the advice is to coat the chain and not wipe off the excess (that’s what Squirt’s packaging says!). I wonder if it would help really drive the lube into the rollers?

    Yes, an experiment that I will not repeat. It puts far too much lube on and I spent weeks with it dribbling out everywhere and having to be wiped down again.

    #877825
    0
    gunswick

    Has anyone tried using a
    Has anyone tried using a chain bath to APPLY lube? Obviously wash and dry first so no degreaser in there! I’m thinking for something like Squirt and other wax based where the advice is to coat the chain and not wipe off the excess (that’s what Squirt’s packaging says!). I wonder if it would help really drive the lube into the rollers?

    #877823
    0
    userfriendly
    dottigirl wrote:
    peted76 wrote:
    userfriendly wrote:
    Also, Sheldon’s site isn’t the final wisdom to end all wisdom when it comes to bike tech. As Sergio points out above, for the use of certain lubricants (i.e. wax-based, like ‘Squirt’) you *have* to completely degrease the chain first. And it’s worth it because ‘Squirt’ is an excellent lube, not just for your dry weather best bike.

    The key to the best way of applying it is incidentally the same as for factory grease: heat. Take the completely degreased and dried chain and put it on a radiator, wait for it to warm up and apply the wax-based lube. Wait a bit till it’s soaked through, turn the chain over and apply again. Repeat for another one or two applications.

    After doing that once, all you ever need to do throughout the life of that chain is to lightly brush off the dirt (it never really sticks as would be the case with any other lube) and re-apply once (on the bike, no need to put it on the radiator again).

    Your reward is a drivetrain completely free of that nasty destructive black gunk typical with conventional lubes, which means less time spent on cleaning and maintenance, and a longer life of all drivetrain components.

    I regularly get asked if I’ve put on a new chain, no matter how long it’s been on the bike.

    Really? That’s amazing.. I’d be up for a bit of fettling like this!

    I tried Squirt. I liked it fresh on the chain, but it would always peel off in lumps, and I’d have to reapply after every 50 miles – it didn’t even last most club runs. On reading this, maybe I was missing out on the heating element of application, as I definitely degreased it enough.

    Had a total ‘mare with the Muc-Off spray dry lube – left the chain to soak in it and it never dried out – was so tacky, the chain stuck to itself, my fingers, and everything it touched.

    I can’t be bothered with wet (or dry) lube anymore since I started using Squirt. And yes, the heat for the initial application is important. You wipe off the excess anyway, you only want it on the roller-plate interface etc., i.e. deep inside.

    I reapply every other ride, which probably equates to about every 100 miles give or take. My cue is when it stops being nice ‘n quiet. I brush or wipe off the dirt if there is any, then just put a drop or two on top of each of the rollers and let it soak in before wiping off any excess and turning the chain a bit to get to the next bit to be lubed.

    A mate who tried it too said he was getting a rusty chain after wet rides, but I’ve not had that problem at all, and I’ve been in some deluges. I think the crucial bit is to get the initial application right: heat and multiple passes. Afterwards it’s all painfree and shiny goodness. 🙂

    #877821
    0
    Griff500

    Back to the OP, KMC advise

    Back to the OP, KMC advise only wiping the outside of the chain with a dry rag (looks like I have been doing something right), never using an aggressive cleaning agent, never completely degreasing, and never immersing the chain or using a chain bath ( which I suspect also means don’t liberally spray the chain with degreaser). The logic, which some here have already alluded to, is that it is easier to remove lube from the rollers using any of these means, than it is to get new lube in, especially if there is solvent residue in there. There is also no guarantee that breaking down and flushing out old lube, will get any abrasive wear particles out.

    I have even swapped between oil based and wax based lubes without degreasing on the basis that if the chain is dry, the new lube will find its way in, or if there is lube already on the rollers, then I’m not too worried about getting new lube in. Before anyone hurls abuse, I wipe and relube every day I ride (no smartass comments please), I  check the chain stretch regularly, and change the chain as soon as the .75 wear point is reached.

    Why make this more difficult than it needs to be?

    #877819
    0
    mike the bike
    Spangly Shiny wrote:
     

     Also, the water dispersal properties aren’t what it was developed for, and the 40 isn’t because it was the 40th attempt either. 

    [/quote]

    Ahem yes it is, check out the company history here.

    http://wd40.com/cool-stuff/history

    [/quote]

     

    In the same way that Chanel No5 was their fifth attempt at creating a chain cleaner?

    #877817
    0
    Nick T

    Okay then chief 

    Okay then chief 

    #877815
    0
    Spangly Shiny
    Nick T wrote:
    Spangly Shiny wrote:
     

     Also, the water dispersal properties aren’t what it was developed for, and the 40 isn’t because it was the 40th attempt either. 

    Ahem yes it is, check out the company history here.

    http://wd40.com/cool-stuff/history

    [/quote]

     

    its a cool story, isn’t it? Shame it’s just s bit of marketing blurb, your very own link explains that it was intended to prevent corrosion on steel tanks rather than displace any water. It was pretty rubbish at that by all accounts, which is why it’s sold for completely different purposes. The WD40 thing was tacked on later. 

    [/quote]

    WD 40 is indeed a water disperant, that is how it prevents corrosion. By penetrating between the substrate and water contaminating it. A very similar  substance (PX28) is used in the military to do the same job i.e. disperse water. Used on helicopters in particular to clear water after wet weather flying or even a wash.

    #877813
    0
    Simon E
    Nick T wrote:
    Do you think it’s worth the risk when there’s better products on the market? Would you claim it’s fine to use a chain degreaser to fix a siezed lock? I do plenty of things in my maintenance that I wouldn’t ever tell others to do over the Internet because while I might know what I’m doing, things get muddled up and misinterpreted by others with less experience. So my advice, don’t put WD40 anywhere near your bike, or chain. As for your HIV analogy, I really don’t know what to say to that. 

    Sorry, it was only an analogy. I couldn’t come up with one to better illustrate what seems to me to be a slightly irrational approach.

    WD and an old t-shirt works for me, I don’t need a ‘better’ product. If someone misinterprets my suggestion that’s not a reason for me not for respond to the OP’s request. Others may wish to follow the advice in GCN’s chain cleaning video.

    #877811
    0
    allanj

    I remember asking a question

    I remember asking a question about chain cleaning and maintenance on this site once.

     

    It degenerated a bit then as well (though my question was very reasonable ), I’ve just about recovered.

     

    Several similar threads later it looks like little has changed- why does this make people so irate?

    #877809
    0
    Nick T
    Spangly Shiny wrote:
     

     Also, the water dispersal properties aren’t what it was developed for, and the 40 isn’t because it was the 40th attempt either. 

    [/quote]

    Ahem yes it is, check out the company history here.

    http://wd40.com/cool-stuff/history

    [/quote]

     

    its a cool story, isn’t it? Shame it’s just s bit of marketing blurb, your very own link explains that it was intended to prevent corrosion on steel tanks rather than displace any water. It was pretty rubbish at that by all accounts, which is why it’s sold for completely different purposes. The WD40 thing was tacked on later. 

    #877807
    0
    Nick T

    Do you think it’s worth the

    Do you think it’s worth the risk when there’s better products on the market? Would you claim it’s fine to use a chain degreaser to fix a siezed lock? I do plenty of things in my maintenance that I wouldn’t ever tell others to do over the Internet because while I might know what I’m doing, things get muddled up and misinterpreted by others with less experience. So my advice, don’t put WD40 anywhere near your bike, or chain. As for your HIV analogy, I really don’t know what to say to that. 

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 35 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.