- This topic has 27 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 3 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
I’ve been building back up the miles after a fairly lax Christmas period where I didn’t do more than one 30 mile ride a week for a couple of months.
I’m finding that once I hit ~40-45 miles or so, my legs just don’t seem to have much left in the tank. I’ll manage another 20 miles or so, but it’s not what I’d call fun.
I’ve just been blaming my fitness and have been slowly increasing distances again. I’m doing about 60 miles a week at the moment, last summer I was regularly doing 80 or so (knee problems aside).
I was looking at some of the data on my new Garmin, and I started paying attention to the “calories burned” number. Today for example it read 2450 or so, considering my “normal” daily intake is 2500, that’s a fairly high number and it got me thinking.
Generally, when fuelling for a ride like today’s (4 hours), I’ll have a big bowl of porridge & protein powder (~400 calories) along with 4-5 slices of malt loaf while I’m out (~130 calories each).
There’s obviously a bit of a deficit there – is that a problem though? I’m not trying to lose any weight (5’9″ and 10 stone), there’s little left to lose.
It doesn’t feel like “proper” bonking – before I started cycling more seriously I spent a summer commuting to work on my MTB without increasing my food intake – I used to feel like hell for the last 5 miles or so of the journey home – but on the plus side I lost three stone in three months đŸ™‚
So, is the consensus to eat enough to match what you burn? Or are my legs just a bit rubbish at the moment and I need to step up the training.
Cheers,
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.