- This topic has 235 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 1 month ago by
Moist von Lipwig.
-
CreatorTopic
-
January 28, 2015 at 1:02 pm #23120
Nix
The next major competition I am looking at getting organised for is the Spring Classics 2015. I would also like to get some prizes organised for a mini-league if it is still possible to run a standard mini-league competition.
Is anyone able to tell me how the Spring Classics will run this year?
For example:
– Will they be the same 12 races as last year, which will mean Omloop Het Nieuwsblad will be first on 22nd Feb … that’s less than a month away.
– Will it be possible for players to run a mini-league for this with just standard scoring on its own, i.e. not standard + purist + whatever scores all added together as aggregate league “scores”.
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
Twybaydos
stealth wrote:This ‘argument’
stealth wrote:This ‘argument’ would support my asking to play the entire year as ‘purist’ with a squad of 25 riders for the whole year. If you lose riders through injury, illness or suspension, tough luck! It should be possible to pick a team that will score throughout the year, or targeted a certain types of ‘event’.Podium cafe do this already. I think the USP of the road.cc game is very separate, but you might enjoy that game with some of us. You may wish to see our thread from last year. http://road.cc/content/forum/110711-podium-cafe-vds
enrique
Joelsim wrote:The more
I’ve come up with a way to try and illustrate my point.Joelsim wrote:The more transfers there are, the more similar the teams will be….
Here’s what I have:On Stage 3 of Qatar, the Time Trial stage, at least 17.1% of the teams in the Standard competititon were ‘unique’ teams…
On Stage 6 of the Tour of Qatar, at least 12.9% of the teams in the Standard competititon were ‘unique’ teams…
I wish I could see the results for Stage 1, but I don’t see how to get them… I figure the higher percentage of unique teams is on Stage 1, but I don’t know for sure.
My premise is as a competition is drawing close to the end, the more similar teams you will get… 😕
Would the Purist competition have a higher percentage of unique teams? :W
I’d need to see the scoring information for the Tour of Qatar Purist competition, which I don’t have access to because I didn’t play it.
Still, with a much more varied terrain, 6 more stages, 550 (!) more riders to choose from in 27 more (!) teams, with practically no (!) riders that ride both (!) the Ardennes and the Cobbled Races, why would you expect more (?) similar teams from less (!) transfers?
If I had access to the TDU Standard and Purist scores, I’d gladly compare those! But I didnt play the TDU, so I can’t see it.
It’s not anywhere perfect, but it could prove whether teams actually vary more, the more transfers you’re given…
Now, if we go with a 15 man Purist team in the Classics, well, it may not be a good comparison, because the Standard teams would only have 8 or 9 man teams, but I’d be happy to try this methodology on another competiton in the future, if somebody will provide the Purist team data… But I think you get my point… In my mind more transfers means more different teams…
enrique
TERatcliffe26 wrote:The races
On another note, you know what I think would be cool? If the last race was tagged on to the Ardennes side of things… 😀 Why not add the De Brabantse Pijl – La Flèche Brabançonne ? 😉TERatcliffe26 wrote:The races will be very similar to last year… at the moment it is likely to be 12 races, with 1 race different to the list above….
Here’s their top 10 from last year:
1 Philippe Gilbert (Bel) BMC Racing Team 4:54:26
2 Michael Matthews (Aus) Orica Greenedge
3 Tony Gallopin (Fra) Lotto Belisol
4 Simon Geschke (Ger) Team Giant-Shimano
5 Björn Leukemans (Bel) Wanty – Groupe Gobert
6 Nathan Haas (Aus) Garmin Sharp
7 Davide Rebellin (Ita) CCC Polsat Polkowice
8 Julien Vermote (Bel) Omega Pharma – Quick-Step Cycling Team
9 Sébastien Reichenbach (Swi) IAM CyclingPretty nice race! It’s right after Roubaix, just 3 days later, and just 4 days before Amstel Gold, and it would even out the calendar between Cobbled Races vs. Hilly Races! 🙂
chiv30
Dave Atkinson wrote:one other
Dave Atkinson wrote:one other option that’s possible within the current game engine is just to give everyone a nice big squad, say 15/18 riders, and then you can make your picks for the whole classics season. thoughts? they’d all score, every race. but then they wouldn’t all be riding every race.Honestly for a purists comp I think that’s the best solution but again can you accommodate that and go with your idea about a std comp simultaneously?
If the answer is yes then I’d stick with it :B
TERatcliffe26
Nix wrote:TERatcliffe26
Nix wrote:TERatcliffe26 wrote:Equally you don’t get sprint points or mountain points in the classics, just purely a breakaway bonus, and picking a breakaway guy for the classics is more about luck than it would be for a GT stage, so if your using trades to target that imo your strategy for the classics is all wrong anyway
I was replying to a comment that Dave made in relation to DSs and Grand Tours. So my comment about sprint and KOM intermediate points was about grand tour scoring and therefore relevant.
Apologies thought you were referring to using that as a classics strategy
enrique
Joelsim wrote:…The more
I look at it the other way around, the less transfers you have, the more I think you play conservatively, go for the sure things, the safe bets, with more transfers and 231 riders that only ride 1 race you can change your team to bring in that guy from a smaller team who will ride his butt off ’cause he’s got only one chance to race at this level the whole year…Joelsim wrote:…The more transfers there are, the more similar the teams will be….
The less transfers you have, the more you’ll stick with Boonen, Cancellara, Vanmarcke and Van Avermaet…The more transfers you have, the more you might risk bringing in different riders for Strade Bianche and the Ardennes… the less transfers you have the more the chance you’ll stick to just bringing in the favorites…
I have no idea why you’d think more transfers mean more similar teams? :W
With 691 riders to choose from, the more transfers we get the more the chance that we’ll rotate some of the mid level riders rather than just rotate through the ‘Big Guns’…
Think of Purists, I think Purist teams end up being more alike because people tend to go to the safer bets… I just find it strange you’d think more transfers means more similar teams… 😕
If I could get a data dump from Dave after this is all through, I’d love to analyze it… 😕
Nix
TERatcliffe26 wrote:
EquallyTERatcliffe26 wrote:Equally you don’t get sprint points or mountain points in the classics, just purely a breakaway bonus, and picking a breakaway guy for the classics is more about luck than it would be for a GT stage, so if your using trades to target that imo your strategy for the classics is all wrong anyway
I was replying to a comment that Dave made in relation to DSs and Grand Tours. So my comment about sprint and KOM intermediate points was about grand tour scoring and therefore relevant.
Enrique,
Thanks very much for those numbers … they show the large variation I would expect given the large number of teams and potential starters for each race.livestrongnick
(No subject)
8}Joelsim
Why Enrique? The more
Why Enrique? The more transfers there are, the more similar the teams will be. Actually don’t bother answering that, it’s going to be the same for all players and you should be in prime position with your spreadsheet.
enrique
TERatcliffe26 wrote:…I
How about 52?… 😀 Or an even 48? But 52 sounds better, 4 per race day and 4 more to cover the complete transition to the Ardennes!:? Thanks!TERatcliffe26 wrote:…I believe transfers will either be at 40 or 45TERatcliffe26
The races will be very
The races will be very similar to last year, in both amount and what is included, at the moment it is likely to be 12 races, with 1 race different to the list abovetherefore I believe transfers will either be at 40 or 45
enrique
Last year:
Dave Atkinson
Last year:Dave Atkinson wrote:The final 12:1st March Omloop
2nd March Kuurne-Brussels-Kuurne
8th March Strade Bianchi
9th March Roma Maxima
23rd March Milan Sanremo
28th March E3 Harelbeke
30th March Gent-Wevelgem
6th April Flanders
13th April Paris-Roubaix
20th April Amstel Gold
23rd April Fleche Wallonie
27th April Liege-Bastogne-LiegeOk, so last year we had the races listed above. 12 races. Unlimited transfers. I don’t think anybody did, but basically with 12 races you could have made 99 transfers, based on completely overhauling your team every time you could… 😕
In a Grand Tour, we used to get 2 transfers a day, including 2 on rest days, too… :W
It seems that this year we’ve been getting the equivalent of 2 transfers per stage played… :W
But in the Tour de France, you have 198 riders from 22 teams to choose from… :W
From my splendid research, which did not include the 2014 Roma Maxima, too lazy that I am, I think there were 691 different riders, from 45 different teams, to choose from in 11 of the 12 races we had last year …
If we look at the transfer to available rider ratio from the Tour, we could set an equivalent ratio of 0.21 transfers per available rider… For the Classics that would mean, keeping the same ratio as the Tour, that we should get 147 transfers… 😕
If we look at the transfer to team ratio from the Tour, we could set an equivalent ratio of 1.91 transfers per team… For the Classics that would mean, keeping the same ratio as the Tour, that we should get 86 transfers… 😕
Dave is proposing 3 transfers between races, plus 6 to cover the transition to the Ardennes, a total of 39 transfers… 😕
I’m proposing 4 transfers between races, plus 8 or 9, depending on team size, to cover the transition to the Ardennes, a total of 52 transfers… 😕
My motivation centers around the fact that Strade Bianche comes in only 2 race days after the first Classics, the number of riders that only did only 1 race last year race was incredible (231!), the number of 3.0 riders from different teams that will be rotating through rosters is inmense!, and the fact I demonstrated above that practically no rider who specializes in the Ardennes, except. Mr. Gilbert, of course, and who knows, maybe Valverde? :?… will score in the first half of the Spring Classics, well that makes it a pretty difficult competittion! :W
It’d just be fun to cover all the races – with some kind of ease – and all that planning that others crave for can be obtained in the Purist game… And! budgets seem to be tight at 140!:W Can’t we ease things a little with transfers then?… :W
At any rate, apart from the transfer issue, will we do the same 12 races again this year? Was Roma Maxima cancelled?… And what races should we expect if not the 12 above?…
TERatcliffe26
But this isnt a virtual DS
But this isnt a virtual DS game, as if it was you would pick a squad prior to the cycling season, then select riders accordingly, so im not sure your comparisons are completely relevant.Equally you don’t get sprint points or mountain points in the classics, just purely a breakaway bonus, and picking a breakaway guy for the classics is more about luck than it would be for a GT stage, so if your using trades to target that imo your strategy for the classics is all wrong anyway
Nix
Dave Atkinson wrote:
In aDave Atkinson wrote:
In a multi-stage tour you’re deciding, as a purist, your tactics for the whole race, just like a DS would.I disagree. From watching daily team output such as OGE’s backstage pass videos it is pretty obvious they are deciding their riding strategy just prior to each GT raceday – depending on things like weather and who ranks where in jersey comps and what other riders will try to do. Sure they may have targeted stage 10 for a key rider when selecting their team pre-race, but when that stage comes they may adopt a completely different strategy.
This is most relevant when it comes to points for intermediate events such as sprints and KOMs – the makeup of each day’s breakaway is much more predictable just prior to the start.
If the DS was a “purist” he wouldn’t even go to a grand tour race, or have pre-stage team meetings, or ride around in the convoy in radio contact with his team. He’d be at home picking his team for a race in 2 weeks time.
Trades aren’t just to compensate for injuries, they are the way a virtual DS gives pre-stage riding instructions to his or her team.
stealth
This ‘argument’ would support
This ‘argument’ would support my asking to play the entire year as ‘purist’ with a squad of 25 riders for the whole year. If you lose riders through injury, illness or suspension, tough luck! It should be possible to pick a team that will score throughout the year, or targeted a certain types of ‘event’. Interest throughout the year could be kept up with mini-leagues for various aspects of the season (cobbled classics, monuments, week long stage races, grand tours, etc.) as well as a season long competition.
Tbh, I’m not quite getting the game this year, as I find that instead of playing, I’m waiting until the competitions that I enjoy start! I’ve only got 8 to play now. -
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.