preferred-google-button
log in
register

Great Manchester Cycle, distance longer (?)

  • Creator
    Topic
  • June 29, 2014 at 10:40 pm #21794
    Leviathan

    I did the Great Manchester Cycle 52 miles today in 2:31:16, a reasonable time but 5 minutes down on last year. I was disappointed at the finish but then I started to think about the course and the tweaks they have made since last year. We still go through the ManU car park but this time approach from the south on Sir Matt Busby way, there was an extra ‘busstop’ chicane at Salford Quays instead of a hairpin and this year we went all the way around the back of the City Stadium. All of these seem small changes but doing these extensions 3or4 times might have added a few extra kilometers.

    Foolishly I wasn’t thinking about the distance coming across the line and didn’t stop my computer. The time might be comparable but I can’t tell without an accurate distance.

    2013
    http://www.roycastle.org/fundraising-and-events/Events/Whats-On/Listing-of-Events/Great+Manchester+Cycle+2014

    2014
    http://www.greatcycle.org/About/course-map

    Both routes are listed as 52miles, but they’re not. Did anyone else do the route today and get an accurate distance? Please, my spreadsheet needs to know.

  • Creator
    Topic
Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • July 2, 2014 at 10:06 pm #801529
    0
    Leviathan

    Welcome Tannwick.
    Welcome Tannwick. 52.4miles=84.3km. I actually found the shortest of a number of Strava segments was 84.2km. As there are plenty of other longer distances by up to an extra kilometre I am happy to take this as my conservative distance. 200m more would equal my speed from last year, so I’m satified I’ve justified the extra time 😀 but it’s not an improvement. We’ll just have to see next year, glad it is on my doorstep.

    Interestingly the timing stripes at Old Trafford meant your time in the ‘pits’ does not count towards you total time. Though my couple of minutes in the bushes does. How did you do?

    July 2, 2014 at 6:20 am #801527
    0
    Tannwick

    For what it’s worth my Garmin
    For what it’s worth my Garmin measured 52.4 miles – not sure if the drink stop at Old Trafford would make that much difference.

    July 1, 2014 at 7:01 pm #801525
    0
    Leviathan

    Thanks for the replies, no
    Thanks for the replies, no definitive distance yet so I may try using Google Earth to measure the differences. I did 82.1km last year and figure I was just taking the racing line on some corners (fair) but maybe it just wasn’t 52m = 83.69km. The fastest time last year was by an Andy Gorton 2:03, this year he did 2:08, still fastest but also 5 minutes down. As the extra distance is in the slower ‘in field’ sections it seems to have had an equal effect on us both.

    Lesson learned, always take your own measurements. But it also means no improvement from me. Though I am a year older and don’t feel as fit anyway so perhaps its alright. I may just be technodoping by buying new wheels and gels and such, or sticking in fast moving groups.

    NotFastEnough, your mate must be proper quick!

    June 30, 2014 at 9:06 am #801523
    0
    jason.timothy.jones

    I cant actually recall an
    I cant actually recall an event that was right on the distance, most are slightly longer, but I did a 10km x country run that was just shy of 9km, I thought I smashed my pb until I looked at my garmin

    June 30, 2014 at 8:35 am #801521
    0
    notfastenough

    I didn’t do it this year, but
    I didn’t do it this year, but it did irk my OCD that previously it was never 52 miles as stated. Perhaps it is now. I managed 2:20 last year, but want to go back and stay with my clubmates who did it (also last year) in 2:07(!).

    June 30, 2014 at 7:06 am #801519
    0
    jason.timothy.jones

    Mine was about 1/2 a mile
    Mine was about 1/2 a mile longer, but last year it was about 1/2 mile shorter per lap

  • Author
    Replies
Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.