Do you trust your handlebar stem?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #21562
    SideBurn

    Riding home after a late shift at silly o’clock in the morning there was a loud bang; it was all I could do not to go over the front of the bike. It was dark and I had no idea what had happened. More to the point I was doing 30mph downhill. The bike swerved right, I hit the tarmac scraped down the road on my back, off the side of the road down an embankment and into a tree….. a downhill skier could not have done it any better 10 out of 10 for style =D>
    Once I had checked all my body parts were in the correct place, I looked at my bike….
    It appears that one of the two bolts holding the bars to the stem had snapped. The second bolt ripped out causing the handlebars to become detached…..
    Luckily I had some electrical tape in my bag, I re-attached the bars and rode home B-)
    Looking at the stem…. two bolts???? What was I thinking????? What a s**t design…. X(
    Maybe I am being a bit harsh; I have had this stem for some time and I have used it on unforgiving territory, or British roads as they are also known.
    Anyway; I have skin missing on my face, shoulder, hip and knee along with very colourful bruises on both of my thighs. Not forgetting the general aches and pains….. I am feeling very sorry for myself 🙁
    I am writing this just to warn others to look very critically at their stem and ask yourself is it fit for purpose?
    This incident could have been so much worse….

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 41 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #796763
    0
    surly_by_name

    drfabulous0 wrote:Two bolts

    drfabulous0 wrote:
    Two bolts is a poor design as you now realise, if they are not tightened evenly then one can be taking excessive force, four bolts or one are better.

    I’ve been a bike mechanic for many years and I have to warn you guys not to put to much faith in reccommended torque settings, it is not uncommon to do up stem bolts to the manufacturer’s specification and find that the bars will slip under a slight load. An experienced mechanic can not only make a fair estimate of torque without the torque wrench but can also feel when the bolts are under sufficient but not excess tension.

    Two bolts no worse than 4: http://www.eastoncycling.com/bike/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/RD-06-2Bolts.pdf (Although now Easton have followed the fashion to 4 bolts, suspect you can’t find this paper so easily on their website anymore.)

    The bigger problem is not a faceplate that is too loose at recommended torque settings but one that is overtightened by someone who doesn’t have the benefit of a torque wrench.

    And the bit about “experienced” mechanics being magical – leaving aside the fact that this is a fairy tale, a mechanic who doesn’t own/use a torque wrench doesn’t deserve the sobriquet “experienced”.

    #796761
    0
    dafyddp

    Glad you survived in one
    Glad you survived in one piece, a 30mph tumble in the dark must be horrific.
    Outside of cycling, I enjoy a spot of rock climbing and it’s interesting to compare the industry response when equipment fails like this. In the event of safety equipment failure, the standard practice is to send it straight back to the manufacturers, who by and large are incredibly responsive – precautionary recalls are not at all uncommon. SRAM hydraulic brakes aside, cycling manufacturers seem less bothered?

    #796759
    0
    Flying Scot

    SideBurn wrote:Flying Scot

    SideBurn wrote:
    Flying Scot wrote:
    I remember these ITM 2 bolt stems failing about 10 years ago, the bolts were gash and there was the torque vs thread friction issues.

    I have been lucky for 10 years? :|

    Possibly, I just remember reading about it before, though they werent the only ones, I’ve no experience of it myself.

    I’m using a 20 year old titanium quill stem on my road bike.

    #796757
    0
    gmac101

    Careful Jellysticks who you
    Careful Jellysticks who you say things like that to – most engineers can talk for hours about this rubbish if you let them – Let me tell you about inviscid hydrodynamics……

    #796755
    0
    SideBurn

    Flying Scot wrote:I remember

    Flying Scot wrote:
    I remember these ITM 2 bolt stems failing about 10 years ago, the bolts were gash and there was the torque vs thread friction issues.

    I have been lucky for 10 years? 😐

    #796753
    0
    Flying Scot

    I remember these ITM 2 bolt
    I remember these ITM 2 bolt stems failing about 10 years ago, the bolts were gash and there was the torque vs thread friction issues.

    #796751
    0
    jellysticks

    gmac101 wrote:When you design

    gmac101 wrote:
    When you design a bolted connection like stem / bar joint you calculate the tension in the bolt that gives you a strong enough joint. The problem is that measuring the tension in the bolt is pretty tricky without special equipment so the most practical thing to do is measure the torque you impose on the nut or the bolt head as a “proxy” for the actual bolt tension. The problem is that it’s not very accurate! It’s a classic first year engineering degree lab to torque up a series of bolts in different conditions and then measure the actual tension in the bolt. If I remember correctly it’s about +/- 25% accurate. The problem is that friction in the bolt/nut system eats up the torque and very little is used to actually tension the bolt but the friction in the system is also very dependent on condition. Some factors include, bolt & nut material, type of grease used (if any) location of the grease on the bolt, foreign bodies & corrosion. If you don’t replicate the conditions the manufacturer assumed when they worked out the recommended torque you could be a long way out from the bolt tension intended. And of course we are all using calibrated torque wrenches aren’t we? So Dr Fabulous0 when you torqued up to the manufacturers recommendation you may well have prepared the bolt better the manufacturer expected and so didn’t reach the required tension.

    I love this kind of stuff. Genuinely. I wish I knew about engineering.

    #796749
    0
    racyrich

    Not quite happened to me, but
    Not quite happened to me, but my clubmate’s stem faceplate cracked. Luckily I happened to notice it when we were stopped, so a careful ride thereafter, no swinging out of the saddle. Stem binned.

    I’ve had a nosebolt go on a Cinelli 1A stem, but that was due to overtightening. Very hard to get them tight enough to stop the bars moving if you hit a hole. After such an incident I wanged it up. Next day, speeding throguh some village in the Ras – BANG – bars shoot round and flop sideways. Lucky to stay upright there.

    #796747
    0
    glynr36

    MKultra wrote:
    I await the

    MKultra wrote:

    I await the storm of pedantic rage but be honest chaps, buying a torque wrench is not a cure for being cack handed.

    That’s exactly what it is a cure for, do bolt up to specified torque, then stop.
    Not, tighten, tighten, tighten, and then a bit more till you think you got 11.8Nm

    The thing is most people don’t realise just how little 15Nm and less is, especially when they’re swinging off the end of an XL length Allen key.

    You can even get the ones that stop going beyond the set torque if you’re really stupid/hamfisted.

    #796745
    0
    SideBurn

    Crosshouses wrote:Jimmy Ray

    Crosshouses wrote:
    Jimmy Ray Will wrote:
    ITM Millennium!!! Isn’t that over 10 years old? I think that, right there is your problem.

    Truth is the stem/bar interface is never going to be that brilliant from an engineering point of view… but things have moved on significantly from those Millennium days.

    Muchos kudos for simply taping your bars back on and riding home… that is truly hardcore!

    Get well soon.

    Oh dear, you’ve got me worried about my 40+ year old bike on which I’m planning to ride the Retro Ronde.

    Will it fall apart on the cobbles? Is there any way to check, short of ultrasonic inspection?.

    Looking at my 30+ year old bike/stems they are very solid looking and look better engineered than this relatively modern stem. I have never known one ancient or modern breaking. I am reassured that no one seems to be saying, “This has happened to me….”
    Suggests I am just unlucky…

    #796743
    0
    MKultra

    I have never had a stem fail
    I have never had a stem fail on me or a bolt snap (for now touch wood), I also have never used a torque wrench on ally or steel stems.

    With the exception of carbon where it is critical to get it right with a torque wrench I would be of the opinion that if you don’t have the feel for getting it right yourself with just an alan key then perhaps you should be taking it to the LBS rather than doing it yourself.

    I await the storm of pedantic rage but be honest chaps, buying a torque wrench is not a cure for being cack handed.

    #796741
    0
    Kapelmuur

    Jimmy Ray Will wrote:ITM

    Jimmy Ray Will wrote:
    ITM Millennium!!! Isn’t that over 10 years old? I think that, right there is your problem.

    Truth is the stem/bar interface is never going to be that brilliant from an engineering point of view… but things have moved on significantly from those Millennium days.

    Muchos kudos for simply taping your bars back on and riding home… that is truly hardcore!

    Get well soon.

    Oh dear, you’ve got me worried about my 40+ year old bike on which I’m planning to ride the Retro Ronde.

    Will it fall apart on the cobbles? Is there any way to check, short of ultrasonic inspection?.

    #796739
    0
    gmac101

    When you design a bolted
    When you design a bolted connection like stem / bar joint you calculate the tension in the bolt that gives you a strong enough joint. The problem is that measuring the tension in the bolt is pretty tricky without special equipment so the most practical thing to do is measure the torque you impose on the nut or the bolt head as a “proxy” for the actual bolt tension. The problem is that it’s not very accurate! It’s a classic first year engineering degree lab to torque up a series of bolts in different conditions and then measure the actual tension in the bolt. If I remember correctly it’s about +/- 25% accurate. The problem is that friction in the bolt/nut system eats up the torque and very little is used to actually tension the bolt but the friction in the system is also very dependent on condition. Some factors include, bolt & nut material, type of grease used (if any) location of the grease on the bolt, foreign bodies & corrosion. If you don’t replicate the conditions the manufacturer assumed when they worked out the recommended torque you could be a long way out from the bolt tension intended. And of course we are all using calibrated torque wrenches aren’t we? So Dr Fabulous0 when you torqued up to the manufacturers recommendation you may well have prepared the bolt better the manufacturer expected and so didn’t reach the required tension.

    #796737
    0
    Anonymous

    Jimmy Ray Will wrote:
    Truth

    Jimmy Ray Will wrote:

    Truth is the stem/bar interface is never going to be that brilliant from an engineering point of view… but things have moved on significantly from those Millennium days.

    I’ve noticed quite a few of the pros riding one-piece stem/bar combinations recently. Seems like a far more sensible approach to me.

    #796735
    0
    farrell

    Quote:I am writing this just

    I am writing this just to warn others to look very critically at their stem and ask yourself is it fit for purpose?

    Maybe *that* is what Chris Froome is doing?

    http://chrisfroomelookingatstems.tumblr.com/

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 41 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.