- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
3 comments
Pro has a carbon steerer fork.
Went for the advance 2 myself and it is great but I change bikes every 2-3 years.
I would get the Pro 2.
The pro has a full carbon fork and frame, while the non pro's fork is carbon with an aluminium steerer. I guess the main difference there would be weight. Personally I would for the pro as it's harder to upgrade a fork than it is other components (at least a fork that matches the rest of the bike) and as P.Radio says, there's not much real world difference between Ultegra and 105 (other than weight).
Advanced Pro 2 for me.
You will not notice a difference between the groupsets. Both are great.