A drug dealer who shot a man attempting to retrieve his stolen bike, leaving him with life-threatening injuries, has been jailed for five years and ten months, after the cyclist tracked him down on social media and confronted him with a pickaxe handle.
The cyclist’s bike was stolen from his home in Hartlepool over the Christmas period in 2024, when he was on holiday with his family at Disneyland Paris.
In Teesside Crown Court this week, prosecutor Nick Dry said the victim then “began putting out feelers” on social media, “couched in strong terms”, in a bid to track down the “valuable” bike, which he used to commute to work every day.
“He made it plain that the return of his bike would be the end of the matter,” the prosecutor continued.
“When it was not returned, matters quickly escalated, largely again on social media, as the trail led to the door of the two defendants.”
The victim managed to limit his search to 21-year-old drug dealer Luis Fonseca and his associate, 20-year-old Derem Turner, Dry told the court this week. A “war of words” then took place between the cyclist and Turner, who offered to return the bike in exchange for payment.
The court was told that the cyclist sent messages threatening to turn up at Turner’s home and take the bike back himself if it wasn’t returned, telling him: “I’m going to go to every f***ing home, the bike better be back today or I’ll take people’s heads off.”
On 2 January, the cyclist, armed with a pickaxe handle, and a group of friends drove to Fonseca’s home, on Hartlepool’s Cameron Road in an attempt to recover the bike.
Sensing that “trouble was brewing”, the 21-year-old fled to Turner’s home on Garside Drive, where he was pursued by the group. The court heard that in the resulting confrontation, the cyclist “advanced towards” Fonesca with the wooden handle.
The thief then immediately produced a handgun and fired a “warning shot” at the group, before shooting the bike owner in the abdomen and liver. The man’s friends rushed him to hospital, where he underwent surgery for his “life-threatening” injuries.
Both Fonseca and Turner fled Hartlepool in the afternoon of the confrontation, splitting up to evade police, before eventually being arrested in Salford and at Scotch Corner, respectively.
During a search of Fonseca’s home, police found six rounds of 9mm ammunition, bearing Turner’s DNA, along with cocaine and crack cocaine worth more than £1,500.
The pair were initially charged with attempted murder, which they denied, with the prosecution accepting their guilty plea to a series of lesser charges the day before they were due to stand trial.
Fonseca pleaded guilty, on the basis that the victim had made intimidating threats towards him, to violent disorder, possession Class A drugs with intent to supply, possession of a prohibited firearm, and possession of ammunition without a certificate.
Meanwhile, Turner – who had been given two previous court orders for assaulting a teacher and dangerous driving, respectively – pleaded guilty to the ammunition charge.
Mitigating, John Elvidge said Fonseca, who was given a suspended sentence in 2023 for crack cocaine possession and owning a bladed article, “was afraid” after the victim threatened to attack him, claiming that “he had no control over a bike that had been taken” and that he fired the shots because he believed he would be subjected to “serious violence”.
Sentencing the pair, Judge Jonathan Carroll said the victim had been “extremely angry about his stolen bike and he was determined to recover it”, before turning up at Fonseca’s home “armed and ready for violence”.
He told Fonseca: “These rounds of ammunition have no legitimate civilian function. In your hands they can only be used for criminal purpose. They are deadly arms and you caused a life-threatening injury.”
Carroll sentenced Fonseca to five years and ten months in a Young Offenders’ Institution, while Turner will serve 23 months and two weeks.
> Your bike’s been stolen – now what? Here’s what to do next (and fast)
In March, we reported that a cyclist in York was left “shaken” after a similar confrontation with thieves who stole his bike from outside a shop. The victim was chased, threatened, and assaulted by the youths but ultimately left in possession of his bike again, after a member of the public stepped in to help him.
While these two incidents highlight the risks that can come with confronting the potentially violent offenders who steal bikes, there has undoubtedly been a loss in confidence in the likelihood of stolen items being recovered through conventional crime-reporting means in the UK, not least with the British Transport Police in January admitting that most bike thefts are “unlikely to ever be solved”.
In November, a former Guardian journalist concluded “if it’s cycle theft you probably need to expect to solve your own crimes”, after he tracked down his stolen cargo bike after the “overstretched” police told him “that’s up to you” and “we do not attend when it’s a block of flats”.

In the same week, another London cyclist led police to a serial bike thief in a DIY sting operation – after spotting his stolen bike on Gumtree – but admitted they had to make “it difficult for the police to ignore” to get any help.
But despite these relative ‘success stories’ on the DIY bike recovery front, the recent cases in York and Hartlepool underline the safety risks that can come with confronting potentially violent criminals over a stolen bike.





















22 thoughts on ““The bike better be back today or I’ll take people’s heads off”: Cyclist shot by thief after tracking down stolen bike on social media”
So won the GC then?
So won the GC then?
Quote:
This sentence is a bit of a mess – suggests that, after being shot and left with life-threatening injuries, the bike owner then tracked down the thief and brought them to justice.
Your honour, in mitigation,
Your honour, in mitigation, my client asks me to remind the court that the injured party was only a cyclist.
lesterama wrote:
Your plea is noted but we feel constrained to point out that having stolen the injured party’s bicycle the accused became, de facto, a cyclist themselves and therefore may expect no mercy from this court.
My client’s intentions were
My client’s intentions were pure and involved no two-wheeled shenanigans: he wanted merely to get another f***ing cyclist off the road. It was his fullest intention to dispose of the bicycle in a manner sustainable to our car-centric society and his bank balance.
So 5 years for drug dealing,
So 5 years for drug dealing, posession of class A drugs, posession of a fire arm and shooting and nearly killing someone. Just christ. How on earth is that not triple that.
Five n a bit years seems
Five n a bit years seems quite light for shooting someone and causing gbh. And it wasn’t the only offence. So he’ll be back on the streets dealing within 2 years if he doesn’t misbehave in jail.
Interesting there was no
Interesting there was no mention of the cyclist being charged for their pickaxe handlery?
Sounds like nobody was
Sounds like nobody was charged for the bike theft either.
That doesn’t sound like tough
That doesn’t sound like tough sentencing. That said, the victim of the theft did himself use threatening behaviour.
There surely are better ways to get stolen property returned?
There are not. The police are
There are not. The police are completel disinterested in theft.
Unfortunately the judiciary
Unfortunately the judiciary have been captured by “progressive” thinking with the result they now routinely dish out trivial sentences that are not a punishment and also don’t serve as a deterrent to others.
And society is sliding into the abyss as a result.
Don’t talk shite.
Don’t talk shite.
there are things called sentencing guidelines and the judges reasons for a sentence are usually published.
The explain almost every apparently lenient sentence – whether you like it or not.
But did they manage to
But did they manage to confiscate the gun? Bullet control works also of course but I suspect those are easier to get (smuggle in or handload). Although it’s never impossible to get these things [example stories here and here and of course the famous case] they are clearly restricted enough so that they are re-used (e.g. see the history of this weapon, used in several killings by different people but still “in the community”).
So removing them from criminal circulation is useful *.
Of course it’s possible that the dealers managed to lose it while fleeing.
* Hopefully this comment doesn’t open up the gun control debate rabbit hole…
Local police advised victims
Local police advised victims of theft not to threaten alleged thieves then take the law into their own hands:
Detective Chief Inspector Burnside said, “If you’re gonna collect your bike, don’t telegraph it to the world before you turn up with a pickaxe handle: you’ll just end up bringing a stick to a gunfight. It’s like an action movie baddie telling the main character what he’s gonna do! Just turn up, get the job done quickly, leave as little claret around the place as you can, and get away quietly.”
I imagine there was some
I imagine there was some schadenfreude towards the victim at the cop shop e.g. “haven’t they even seen Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels”?
When the Police are less
When the Police are less effective than the victim of the crime at finding stolen property and then unwilling to retrieve it, then society will break down. When the criminal then defends themselves and gets a derisory sentence then you know it already has in many UK towns and cities.
5yrs just for nearly killing
5yrs just for nearly killing s.1… 20x that should’ve been the sentence! the guys a danger to society!
So the victim had some drugs
So the victim had some drugs in his house, defended himself from an a crazy stalker with a pickaxe handle threatening to take his head off and ended up with 5 years in jail?
What happened to his vigilante attacker?
FragileBoris wrote:
You seem to be missing the bit where he “defended himself from a crazy stalker” by shooting him with an illegal firearm. That played rather a large part in the sentence, one imagines.
Estate agent skills there:
Estate agent / defense lawyer skills there: “the victim had some drugs in his house” is an interesting way of describing a dealer!
chrisonabike wrote:
“Ronnie Biggs, who had a suspicious amount of spare change on his premises…”