Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

TECH NEWS

Check your cranks! Shimano finally recalls 11-speed road cranksets after more than 4,500 incidents

Shimano announces a voluntary inspection and replacement recall notice for 760,000 Dura-Ace and Ultegra bonded 11-Speed road cranksets in North America, and a "safety inspection" in Europe

After receiving over 4,500 incident reports, Shimano has announced a voluntary recall of Hollowtech II road cranksets produced between 2012 and 2019 for a possible bonding separation issue in North America. That includes two generations of the popular Ultegra and Dura-Ace cranksets totalling 760,000 cranksets, and over 2.8 million are affected worldwide. In the UK and Europe, Shimano has instead issued an "inspection and replacement program" rather than a full recall. 

> Investigating Shimano's snapping cranksets: What happened, unanswered questions and an engineer's report

hawinspeter crank arm failure

For many people, the delamination, or separation, of Shimano Ultegra and Dura-Ace cranksets won't come as news. In fact, we covered the issue back in 2021, when Shimano denied any problem with the design. 

“During our examination of usage cases, and through our own internal testing, we have not identified a design problem with the cranks, and we are continuing our investigation to discover other factors or causes,” the company said at the time.

It would appear that this investigation has now brought an issue to light as today Shimano has issued a "Voluntary Inspection and Replacement Recall Notice" for selected bonded 11-speed Hollowtech II road cranksets that were produced between 1 June 2012 and 30 June 2019, for what it describes as a "possible bonding separation issue".

2023 shimano crank recall cranksets

The affected products are Dura-Ace and Ultegra branded cranksets with the following model numbers: Ultegra FC-6800 and FC-R8000, and Dura-Ace FC-9000, FC-R9100, and FC-R9100-P. You can find the product code stamped on the inside of the crank arms at the pedal end.

Shimano points out that not all 11-speed Hollowtech II road cranksets are part of the recall and that only those produced during the specified period need to be inspected.

2023 Shimano Ultegra Broken crank delamination 5

"We expect only a very small percentage of these cranksets will need to be replaced," Shimano said.

Customers have been advised to follow Shimano's online 'Crank Identification and Inspection Process', visit bike.shimano.com, or visit with an authorised Shimano retailer. The company says that inspections will occur at Shimano authorised retailers, and any crankset that does not pass the inspection process will be replaced free of charge. 

The document goes on to say that "the replaced crankset will be a special version, which may feature a different cosmetic appearance while maintaining the same level of performance."

2023 Shimano Ultegra Broken crank delamination

The recall also states that if your crankset passes the inspection and has no signs of delamination, then you can "continue to enjoy your ride. Have your bike tuned up and inspected regularly, ask your dealer for recommendations based on your riding habits. Pay attention to changes in the sound and feel of how your bike is riding."

Given the number of comments, blog posts, and indeed broken cranksets that we've received over the years, we're confident in saying that the problem is widespread.

2023 Shimano Ultegra Broken crank delamination 2

At the time of writing an official recall only applies to the USA and Canada, where 760,000 cranks were sold. This can be found on the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission website

The situation is different in the UK and Europe, as Shimano Europe has not officially announced a recall, rather an "inspection and replacement program" where Shimano "will have any applicable crankset inspected". 

A statement on Shimano's EU website acknowledges that the “safety and inspection and replacement programme” also affects riders in the EU and that “the timing of the inspection and other details will be announced on this website in the near future”.

We'd better ride carefully until then!

2023 Shimano Ultegra Broken crank delamination 2 cross section

road.cc has sent off multiple cranksets to laboratories to be investigated as part of our own study, with our early findings concluding so far that an essential preliminary stage in the failure of the cranksets is the partial debonding of the inner and outer U-shaped channels that together make up the rectangular tube section of the crank arm.

2023 Shimano Ultegra Broken crank delamination 1

When satisfactorily bonded the section is of adequate strength to resist any loads that it commonly sees. However, if partial debonding occurs between the parts, the upper/inner channel is vulnerable to the size of loads that may commonly be applied during use.

No conclusions, however, have yet been made concerning how debonding between the two U-shaped channels initiates. Flaws resulting from the manufacturing process, environmental deterioration, and fatigue have all been considered as possibilities. Whichever is at fault, such partial debonding of the two channels is a notable weakness that might eventually lead to gross failure.

2023 Shimano Ultegra Broken crank delamination 4

Any proposed solution to the problems noted by us in our study will depend on how frequently failures occur. If rarely, then this might be considered acceptable by the manufacturer. If it is a frequent problem (and a list of 4,500 incidents in North America alone seems fairly frequent to us) the recall of the product, like Shimano have just initiated with the Hollowtech IIs, and a redesign will be necessary.

Have you been affected by the delaminated cranks? And do you think Shimano should have acted sooner? Let us know in the comments section below...

Jamie has been riding bikes since a tender age but really caught the bug for racing and reviewing whilst studying towards a master's in Mechanical engineering at Swansea University. Having graduated, he decided he really quite liked working with bikes and is now a full-time addition to the road.cc team. When not writing about tech news or working on the Youtube channel, you can still find him racing local crits trying to cling on to his cat 2 licence...and missing every break going...

Add new comment

38 comments

Avatar
millhouse | 7 months ago
1 like

I'm wondering how long this inspection campaign will last and how many times you can ask for your cranks to be inspected? After inspection, there is no remedy for the potential delamination which means that a crank could start to fail soon after inspection. Therefore cranks will need regular inspections for the rest of their service. I have 3 bikes with Ultegra cranks and a new 6800 chainset in the loft.

Avatar
bod1611 | 7 months ago
0 likes

Silly question (which i apologise for!).  All the pictures show the crank arm on the driveside failing - is there a risk of the left crank arm failing at all?  Can't seem to find any information of whether the separation could happen on that side.  Reason i ask is that my right side isn't included in the recall but my left side is!

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to bod1611 | 7 months ago
0 likes

bod1611 wrote:

Silly question (which i apologise for!).  All the pictures show the crank arm on the driveside failing - is there a risk of the left crank arm failing at all?  Can't seem to find any information of whether the separation could happen on that side.  Reason i ask is that my right side isn't included in the recall but my left side is!

I've only heard of the drive side failing, so if I were you, I'd wait for the recall to reach the UK (assuming you live here).

Avatar
bod1611 replied to hawkinspeter | 7 months ago
0 likes

Thanks, yeah, i'm in the UK so will sit tight.

Avatar
HiFi replied to bod1611 | 7 months ago
2 likes

Google 'instagram thanksshimano' - 100s of failures on both sides.

Avatar
BBB | 7 months ago
0 likes

I assume that customers who purchased their chainsets/groupsets online at heavy discounted prices, will be posting them back to their retailers instead of harassing random IBD's they don't support;-)

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to BBB | 7 months ago
0 likes

BBB wrote:

I assume that customers who purchased their chainsets/groupsets online at heavy discounted prices, will be posting them back to their retailers instead of harassing random IBD's they don't support;-)

Since Shimano are telling people to go to their local listed shimano service centre (which is not all local bike shops) then this statement is nonsense. Shimano are paying their service centres for this service, who the customer bought their bike from is irelevant.

(I support my LBS with plenty of servicing payments over the years, I also do the maintenance jobs I can myself with online parts. LBS is not close to going out of business, In fact if I want anything doing I have to book in 2 weeks in advance, so giving them more work doesn't help anyone)

Avatar
slappop | 7 months ago
0 likes

I'm still on 10-speed Ultegra (which should be enough for anyone...). Looks good so far, but it is a bonded crank.

Avatar
tubasti replied to slappop | 7 months ago
1 like

That was before Shimano went all-in for heroic weight-reduction measures. 6600 has been around for 18 years without a recall, 6700 for 15 or 16. Yes, cranks break. Your mileage will vary.

Avatar
pockstone | 7 months ago
2 likes

I'm on Shimano Ultegra now...Half crank Half biscuit

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to pockstone | 7 months ago
2 likes
pockstone wrote:

I'm on Shimano Ultegra now...Half crank Half biscuit

Are you only twenty-eight away, with a tailwind?

Avatar
pockstone replied to Rendel Harris | 7 months ago
1 like

Some tailwind needed with a chocolate chainset.

Avatar
Kim Chee | 7 months ago
2 likes

There is wisdom in the old combo of either having Campy or Sugino Cranks, Dia Compe brakes, and Shimano shifting!

Avatar
PRSboy | 7 months ago
1 like

I'm surprised that now they've identified and acknowledged an issue there is not more urgency about the recall.  The consequences for example of a rider falling in front of a vehicle due a crank arm separation could be horrific, not to mention litigious for Shimano.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to PRSboy | 7 months ago
0 likes

PRSboy wrote:

I'm surprised that now they've identified and acknowledged an issue there is not more urgency about the recall.  The consequences for example of a rider falling in front of a vehicle due a crank arm separation could be horrific, not to mention litigious for Shimano.

I've had an email from my LBS

Avatar
Simmo72 | 7 months ago
2 likes

About time. So many cases, more than just an expected defect rate and the issue is sudden and catastrophic failure which is highly dangerous.   It's negligent of Shimano to have taken this long.  I chucked my ultegra cranks (wasn't going to have selling to someone else on my conscience) and sold the rings, couldn't stop them creaking and just had no faith in them being a taller, heavier rider.    

Avatar
Daveyraveygravey | 7 months ago
3 likes

My first went in 2018, a 6800 Ultegra, which was about 6 months outside the warranty.  I managed to get Shimano to replace it but had to resort to shaming them on social media and sending nasty letters.  I had been staying with family on the N Yorks moors and was on my way to Rosedale Chimney when it went from being slightly odd/annoying to clearly almost coming apart.  It was a long 30 km ride back to base trying to pedal one-legged!

The replacement went in November 2022.  I didn't bother contacting them, I found a barely used 105 on ebay for £50 so snapped that up.  I've read that 105 is not Hollowtech construction so should be good.

It's a shame Shimano behaved the way they did about it prior to yesterday, I had nothing but good to say about Ultegra for all the time it worked.  I won't buy another bike with it, that's for sure.

Avatar
philsinclair | 7 months ago
0 likes

On my N-1, Time ZXRS, I have a Dura-Ace FC-9100 OL. I do not know if it is OK and I do not think that a dealer would know any different. Generally, it is in good condition for a five-year-old crankset. It does have fair usage scratches. Specifically, there is a minor scratch at the junction of the spider with the chain ring. Would this potentially end in failure or not. Would dealer A, say it is OK, whereas dealer B, would say replace?

Avatar
philsinclair | 7 months ago
0 likes

double posted apologies ... surprise

Avatar
BadgerBeaver replied to philsinclair | 7 months ago
4 likes

Do we expect cranks to EVER fail? I don't. 

Avatar
philsinclair replied to BadgerBeaver | 7 months ago
0 likes

BadgerBeaver wrote:

Do we expect cranks to EVER fail? I don't. 

I had an FSA 10 speed crankset previously. The crank never failed. The Spring washer connecting it to the left hand crank kept breaking. I kept a spare set of washers and an allen key with me afterwards. The connecting nut unwound and the crank fell off during a training camp in Sardinia. A friend of mine complained on another training camp that his crank was loose. Same problem. My wife's back wheel kept pulling loose. It turned out that the LBS had cross threaded the BB. The crankset was damaged as a result. All replaced with Ultegra R8000 and luckily she has a TM code. Looks pretty solid at the moment.

I think there is a whole raft of problems with cranksets and BB's. I am dismayed to find out that Shimano is problematical. My N+1 is Campag seems to be good.

Wasn't the 12 speed DI-2 delayed, apparently due to crank failures?.

Avatar
tubasti replied to BadgerBeaver | 7 months ago
0 likes

Well, failures of Campagnolo Nuovo and Super Record cranks of the '60s through the '80s are not expected but not uncommon. If you have them, look for a telltale crack where the crank arm joins the spider.

Avatar
Paul J replied to tubasti | 6 months ago
0 likes

There is a famous picture of Fignon sitting on the ground checking his legs after crashing due to his campagnolo bottom bracket axle breaking - the crank and pedal lying nearby.

https://inrng.com/2012/08/1982-fignon/

Avatar
Griff500 | 7 months ago
4 likes

Seems strange that Shimano think a one off inspection irrespective of mileage is good enough. My 2016 Ultegra crank failed at around 25,000km. I'm pretty sure if I had inspected it at 20,000 it would have passed.

Avatar
HiFi | 7 months ago
3 likes

Congratulations to the thanksshimano admin (google 'instagram thanksshimano'). There, over 16,000 have watched the slow motion car crash of the shimano bonded thin-walled-aluminium painted-box-section design.

 

Avatar
Daddy Feebs | 7 months ago
1 like

"Different cosmetic appearance" - the fun's really going to start if they send everyone a load of Tiagra cranks though

Avatar
cyclisto replied to Daddy Feebs | 7 months ago
1 like

I don't think that crankset production costs for Shimano that much different regardless if it is Tiagra or Dura Ace. A Dura Acecrankest now is it sold almost 500£ and it is a kilo of casted or cnc machined aluminium and doesn't seem to include any kind of serious handwork like on welded frames on your cheapest supermarket bicycle.

There are some costs for design, some for marketing, that will not be payed again, but the real manufacturing cost difference between a Tiagra and a Dura Ace once the productions lines are set must be really small.

Edit: nevertheless I dread to imagine what the poor guy responsible for this failure has heard in Harakiri-if-fail Japan.

Avatar
antigee | 7 months ago
1 like

"However, at the time of writing the recall only applies to the USA and Canada, where 760,000 cranks were sold".... just checked Shimano's Australia site and this lists the model numbers and production codes of concern and says something along the lines of details of an inspect and/or replacement programme will follow shortly....it's spring and bike impacted is on the turbo so no worries

Avatar
quasijones | 7 months ago
0 likes

The FAQ says if you have a faulty crank with 3rd party power meter they will pay a rebate.  No mention of how much that will be but I guess good news for 4iiii etc who will likely see a boost in Shimano funded orders.

Pages

Latest Comments