UK Sport has denied that it has called for the departure of British Cycling chairman Jonathan Browning in the wake of criticism of the organisation contained in the independent review, details of which were leaked last week.
The review reportedly says that British Cycling’s board “reversed” the findings of an internal investigation into the allegations of sexism made by track sprinter Jess Varnish against former Great Britain technical director Shane Sutton.
British Cycling ultimately upheld just one of nine charges against Sutton, who had resigned last April following further claims of bullying and discrimination against him that prompted UK Sport to order the independent review.
Yesterday, a report in the Observer said that senior figures in UK Sport considered Browning’s position to be “untenable.” Meanwhile, Varnish told the Mail on Sunday that the whole British Cycling board should resign.
But last night, UK Sport, the government agency which provides National Lottery cash to national governing bodies of Olympic and Paralympic sports, said it had supported Browning’s appointment as chairman.
He had been a non-executive director of British Cycling for three years prior to that, and replaced Bob Howden, who remains president.
The agency also said it helped approve the recent appointments of Julie Harrington as British Cycling’s chief executive, and of Stephen Park as performance director.
British Cycling has already outlined a 39-point joint action plan with UK Sport to make the "necessary changes to both culture and governance" in the wake of the independent review.
UK Sport said that both it and Sport England “supported the move that the British Cycling board took to elect Jonathan Browning, one of their independent board members, to chair the organisation, pending the agreement and implementation of that action plan."
It added that the action plan would need to be agreed "before any new funding flows from April 2017," with British Cycling due to receive £26 million in the current Olympic cycle, and that Harrington and Park "have an important role to play in delivering the necessary changes.".
Regarding the independent review, UK Sport said: "The boards of both organisations received a draft version in December and all parties have accepted the emerging recommendations of the panel in full.
"The board of British Cycling took early action to prepare a 39-point action plan based on the emerging findings and the recommendations of the review to systematically address the cultural and behavioural shortcomings in British Cycling and made a public commitment to focusing much more on their people, alongside the good work they do on participation and performance.
"UK Sport is satisfied that this plan addresses the findings and recommendations of the draft report."
This for me from cycling Santa this morning:
In SE London, psychopath riders are the majority of people on bicycles Oh dear! another festive stealth anti-cyclist ☃️
Well, you know the BMW drivers' saying: knock that house (hospital, social housing, care home, hospital...) down, could save 30 seconds on the trip!
“It’s all very well to spend millions on facilities but if there’s no money for maintenance, it’s a waste of public money."...
I had the pleasure of owning two of the featured builders here, in my history. When I joined the Army in 1971, I took with me my curly Hetchins:...
Could Siobhán paint it red and noone would notice it?
To paraphrase Field of Dreams, "Build it right and they will come: and use it!"
And a Happy Christmas to you, road.cc staff!
The odds of not being able to find a single pedestrian - just one, note, "any pedestrian" - in an area containing more than about ten of them who...
I love how wannabe racer reviewers talk about fork flex under braking like their tyres are made of glue. I find traction gives long before fork flex.