Cycling England once highlighted Long Causeway bike racks as best practice - council plans to rip them out and not replace them

Peterborough, a former sustainable travel demonstration town, has made no provision for cycle parking in a planned remodelling of one of its principal shopping streets, Long Causeway - and is removing existing bike racks there once cited as a way of getting cycling infrastructure right. Cycle campaigners and bike riders are urging the council to reconsider its plans, which are currently open for consultation. 

The Sustrans in Peterborough Facebook page points out that the cycle racks currently in place on Long Causeway were once highlighted by Cycling England – which was abolished by the Coalition Government in 2010 – as an example of best practice cycle parking.

However Peterborough Today reports that they will be removed as part of the council's £2 million transformation of the street due to begin next year and which will see new seating as well as other street furniture – but no cycle parking – installed. 

Other features of the remodelling of the street include the creation of a new square to replace existing seating and paving, as well as uplighting trees.

Peterborough City Council maintains that the public were given the opportunity to study the plans, with a spokesman saying: “There was a good level of comment and discussion at public exhibitions, particularly on the proposed removal of cycle parking and the need to address this to encourage cycle use.

“There was support expressed for the need for makeover and people like what they have seen in the recent works to Bridge Street,” he continued.

A consultation on the plans closes on 30 December, with the council spokesman adding: "All comments will be evaluated and considered.”

One cyclist, Jonathan Frascella, told Peterborough Today: “By removing cycle parking from the main thoroughfares into the city centre and moving it to out-of-sight side streets, the council is failing on most of its own key criteria.

“If it solely reduces the quantity of cycle parking provision then this is even worse as existing cycle parking is already at capacity, highlighting the need for more, not less suitable cycle parking.”

Another, Nik Williams, added: “Removing cycle parking will result in less people cycling into the city.”

In its Local Transport Plan 3 covering the period 2011-16, Peterborough City Council says it that aims to “continue to build upon the success achieved during the sustainable travel demonstration town period by promoting Travelchoice and increasing use of sustainable modes…”

It adds:

Peterborough will increase the number of cycling trips throughout the authority area.

Peterborough will be home to a well-developed and safe network of cycle routes, cycle hubs, cycle parking, and other supported facilities.

In order to realise this vision the city council will concentrate on the following objectives:

• To increase the number of cyclists in Peterborough

• To reduce physical and psychological barriers to cycling

• To increase safety and security for Peterborough’s cyclists

• To highlight the health benefits of cycling.

Meanwhile, a poll currently running on the Peterborough Telegraph’s live news blog finds 89 per cent of respondents in favour of cycle parking being incorporated into the plans for Long Causeway and 11 per cent against, although it is not stated how many have voted.

In a March 2009 final evaluation report for Peterborough City Council produced by Socialdata and Sustrans, “upgrades to the cycle network” and “cycle parking at key city centre locations”were highlighted as among the positive measures the council had taken.

Born in Scotland, Simon moved to London aged seven and now lives in the Oxfordshire Cotswolds with his miniature schnauzer, Elodie. He fell in love with cycling one Saturday morning in 1994 while living in Italy when Milan-San Remo went past his front door. A daily cycle commuter in London back before riding to work started to boom, he's been news editor at road.cc since 2009. Handily for work, he speaks French and Italian. He doesn't get to ride his Colnago as often as he'd like, and freely admits he's much more adept at cooking than fettling with bikes.


Herbie [14 posts] 4 years ago

Not gonna Peterborough no more!

a.jumper [850 posts] 4 years ago

We hear a lot about Cambridge cycling campaign but is there one in Peterborough?

BikePeterborough [2 posts] 4 years ago

Great article Road.cc! Thanks for drawing attention to the issue - it really is a ridiculous situation; even today the 48 spaces on Long Causeway are full - we need more provision, not none!

The article referred to above can be found here; it's a good read: http://blog.jofftastic.co.uk/2013/12/peterborough-city-council-anti-cycl...

BikePeterborough [2 posts] 4 years ago

No campaign group as such, but an active cycle forum, that is supposed to work with the council to improve things!

Guyz2010 [304 posts] 4 years ago

Does seem strange but are they really not creating more spaces elsewhere. I suspect we cyclist believe it is our right to cycle where motorist cannot is not really a correct assumption. I dunno.
Sticking bikes up a back alley isn't conducive to promoting sustainable transport when you have to take into account bikes are easily stolen. Visability!

stealfwayne [128 posts] 4 years ago

I am very fond of Peterborough, I used to ride there every day - and it's full of cycle lanes and routes - you can literally go anywhere without having to ride on roads. They used to be well maintained so am a little suprised at this. Though I suspect they will place suitable parking elsewhere - why they want to remove it is beyond me.
Their Sustainable Transport office needs to put his / her nose into the discussions and make a nuiscence of themselves.

Bob Melville [1 post] 4 years ago

Correction to the blog. Consultation actually ends on December 20th - not 30th as reported.

Local police report that there has been an increase in cycle thefts in the city centre in the past few weeks. With the removal of proper, authorised cycle parking this situation is only likely to become worse.

Cycle parking needs to be reinstated in the plans or this will just be another nail in the coffin of the council's stated aim of becoming the county's Environment City!