TDF Stage 8 Castres –> Ax 3 Domaines

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #19293
    Ghedebrav

    Hello mountains! 😀

    Getting in early with this as I’m out on a ride tomorrow AM. I’ve enjoyed the Tour up to now, but this stage is the first one I’ve put a big circle round in the calendar.

    So does anybody dare reveal their plans? Who has saved their transfers? Who are we tipping for the win?

    I won’t say who I’ve picked, but I will say that I’ve gone for a spread of a few mid-20 guys rather than a big GC feller. I reckon Contador will go for the win, but fancy Rolland to crest the first HC climb in the lead. I’m basing these predictions on absolutely nothing, by the way.

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 122 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #746367
    0
    northstar

    So I should stop watching
    So I should stop watching because of one team? right.

    The fact that stumpy is attacking me for disagreeing with him says a lot, why he think it’s because he is a PO is bemusing.

    #746365
    0
    Ghedebrav

    Could it just be that the
    Could it just be that the other top climbers have now just *stopped* doping?

    And what about Quintana? Is he doping too? TBH I just don’t see any point tying yourself in knots trying to distinguish doped performances from great performances. Of course there’s always doubt in cycling because of the history of the sport. But really if you’re going to call out every outstanding performance with snark and innuendo, why even bother watching?

    #746363
    0
    northstar

    It’s clear what I think of
    It’s clear what I think of the performances, if i put it on here i’d only be getting myself and (maybe?) your website in trouble (which I don’t want too obviously) – silly laws I know but there you go.

    #746361
    0
    dave atkinson

    but what *are* your points?
    i

    but what *are* your points?

    i think it’d be naive to not approach a ride like that with some cynicism. it’s equally naive to take one stage – and the first mountain stage even more so – as incontrovertible proof of doping.

    as it is quite often, the most reasonable response is here: http://www.sportsscientists.com/2013/07/froomes-first-mountain-performance-cue.html

    Let’s wait to analyze the entire Tour, the collection of climbs, and then compare to history’s known dopers. The problem when you get too close in is a kind of “performance pixelation”, so step back and see the whole screen. That will happen in time.

    #746359
    0
    northstar

    I notice you are still
    I notice you are still avoiding the real issue and think it’s all about you, bit like the subjects of the topic it seems.

    #746357
    0
    northstar

    It has nothing to do with you
    It has nothing to do with you being a police officer, get over yourself.

    You’re the one who needs help with your blind faith in the above.

    #746355
    0
    Stumps

    Dave, he doesn’t like me
    Dave, he doesn’t like me because i’m a Police officer and has to make sarcastic comments on virtually every comment i make.

    I assume its a game to him, if not then he needs help 😀

    #746353
    0
    dave atkinson

    northstar wrote:
    I notice you

    northstar wrote:

    I notice you can’t answer my points and probably never will ; )

    what are your points? i scrolled up but basically it seems to boil down to ‘LOL’ – is there more?

    #746351
    0
    STEVESPRO 79

    I said in an earlier post
    I said in an earlier post that I do not like Froome… I quite simply do not like the guy’s demeanour, he comes across as being smarmy to me and I never really believe what he says….. Couple that with his NEAR disregard for team orders with Wiggo last year, and that is why I will never completely trust him…

    Yesterday to put that much time into the worlds top climbers on the first lumpy day on the tour is a little suspicious in my opinion…If it was 10 or 20 secs fair enough but with that margin I shall remain a little sceptical….

    However, my fingers are crossed that time proves my suspicions wrong….and to be totally hypocritical, he is now in my team…. /:)

    #746349
    0
    northstar

    stumps wrote:northstar

    stumps wrote:
    northstar wrote:
    stumps wrote:
    northstar wrote:
    Pure class? lol.

    I take it you disagree ? Never mind there’s always one.

    LOL, none to blind as those who don’t want to see.

    You’re in the minority if you think that was normal it seems.

    Blinded much?

    Oh dear, how sad, never mind. Lets hope he goes on and wins by a massive margin just to really wind you up =))

    I notice you can’t answer my points and probably never will ; )

    #746347
    0
    northstar

    LOL now pretending it winds
    LOL now pretending it winds me up.

    I just find it very sad and anyone who defends it.

    If he does go onto win it, i won’t recognise it.

    #746345
    0
    Stumps

    northstar wrote:stumps

    northstar wrote:
    stumps wrote:
    northstar wrote:
    Pure class? lol.

    I take it you disagree ? Never mind there’s always one.

    LOL, none to blind as those who don’t want to see.

    You’re in the minority if you think that was normal it seems.

    Blinded much?

    Oh dear, how sad, never mind. Lets hope he goes on and wins by a massive margin just to really wind you up =))

    #746343
    0
    northstar

    stumps wrote:northstar

    stumps wrote:
    northstar wrote:
    Pure class? lol.

    I take it you disagree ? Never mind there’s always one.

    LOL, none to blind as those who don’t want to see.

    You’re in the minority if you think that was normal it seems.

    Blinded much?

    #746341
    0
    Stumps

    northstar wrote:Pure class?

    northstar wrote:
    Pure class? lol.

    I take it you disagree ? Never mind there’s always one.

    #746339
    0
    northstar

    Pure class? lol.
    Pure class? lol.

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 122 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.