- This topic has 28 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by
hotweathercyclist.
-
CreatorTopic
-
October 18, 2012 at 12:41 pm #17069
Baldy1alex
Mandatory Helmet use or Not What do Ya think
personaly i Hate the things other than if raceing, where it makes sense me thinks !! 😕 -
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
stepho
I never go anywhere on my
I never go anywhere on my bike without one, they are light not particularly uncomfortable and could save your life.O:)
sihall34
I think they should be made
I think they should be made mandatory although I know that isn’t a very trendy view. I can’t see why you wouldn’t choose to wear one when it could help prevent injury or worse so I see no logical argument as to why they are a bad thing to wear.I know there are quite a few reasons why people think they shouldn’t wear one, some mentioned above and there are a few others as well but they seem more like excuses to me rather than actual reasons and I think it seems to stem from the fact that people don’t like being told what to do, if they choose to wear one, great, but if ‘the man’ says you must, they will refuse.
I think PhilRuss is missing the point slightly when he points to other people having head injuries too, that’s not what it’s about, it’s about reducing the number of cyclists’ head injuries and that should be the point in my opinion.
Leviathan
So a helmet is like backing
So a helmet is like backing up your hard-driveaende
Up to the
Up to the individual.However, I have 2 beautiful daughters and I wear a helmet every time I ride a bike; I wear it for them, Not for me.
Daddy would like to remember their childhood. Head injuries are not just physical and can happen at any speed – I would rather not have a low speed accident but a head injury that threatens my family a la James Cracknell.
A helmet will, obviously, afford some protection, to a point…..
Littlesox
At the moment, it’s your
At the moment, it’s your choice.Personally, I don’t go out without one.
Friend of mine suffered severe head injuries a few years ago, having jumped on his bike to just pop in to town. He was knocked off by a car coming out of a side-turning. It happened less than half a mile from his home, at low speed and in broad daylight.
He now has serious difficulties and his life is one long challenge. I admire him for what he achieves in these circumatances, but he always says that he wished he had put a helmet on.
Similar comments to those saying that they refuse to be told to wear one were made when car seat-belt legislation was introduced.
Modern helmets are light, give good ventilation and are no great hassle to wear. The pros wear them, so I can’t see what the problem is.
You know it makes sense…..
PhilRuss
Hoopdriver wrote:What’s the
Hoopdriver wrote:What’s the big deal? It’s a hat, for God’s sake
[[[[ Dear Hoopdriver—-you’re entirely missing the point, old bean. Far more drivers & their passengers get head-injuries than do cyclists. So if THEY were to object to a proposal that all car-occupants and passengers must wear helmets, you’d say, “What’s the big deal–it’s just a hat!”, would you? And let’s not forget the pedestrians—-helmets for all! What’s the big deal?
P.R.Baldy1alex
Raleigh wrote:Just wear one
Raleigh wrote:Just wear one and shut up.
Here come Adolf’s Cycle Core Me Thinks B-)Hoopdriver
What’s the big deal? It’s a
What’s the big deal? It’s a hat, for God’s sakePhilRuss
Car occu-pants get head
Car occu-pants get head injuries too….ergo, helmets in cars. AND on the noggins of pedestrians. And, now I come to think of it, my dog’s head was biffed by a car he chased, one time. And he only did that one time, and he wasn’t injured anyway….but clearly, here’s a case for compulsory dog-hats!
No, if I’m ORDERED to don a skidlid, I’ll simply continue to wear the banana-hat I have already, just for retro-flash. Kick racism out of football, and kick fascism out of cycling!
P.R.Paul J
If you’re just out for a nice
If you’re just out for a nice cycle, and you’re happy to slow down when you see any potential obstacles that might cross your path, like cars waiting to come out of or turn into side-roads, and you’re not intending to do anything risky like downhill mountain biking or riding at speed in tight bunches, then it should be perfectly acceptable to go au naturale.Millions of dutch, from young to quite old, manage to get about on bicycles every day, just wearing normal clothes, without fuss. And they have to mix with traffic at times, even there. Yes, the cars here aren’t quite as aware as there – you need to be more aware here, but if you take your lane the roads are mostly ok – at least inside urban areas IME (the 50 to 70mph A-roads can be unpleasant).
I really don’t get the scare-mongering there is around cycling in the UK. It’s a little bit more dangerous than it should be, compared to NL, but it’s still pretty safe compared to other things UKers have no problem with – especially if you take a bit of care and cycle sensibly. Just go and cycle. The statistics say it’s generally a positive thing to do, whatever you do or don’t wear.
Gkam84
Nope, most of the time I
Nope, most of the time I don’t, only when cycling in large cities.I refuse to be told I HAVE to wear one, even if it was made law, no chance, until their is proof they save lives, then I won’t be wearing one. The only thing it saves at the moment, is road rash on your scalp.
steve hill
Try complaining when your a
Try complaining when your a vegetable :ORaleigh
Just wear one and shut up.
Just wear one and shut up. -
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.