- This topic has 24 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 10 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
It doesn’t appear to have
It doesn’t appear to have been libellous as other reports only mention it being ‘upsetting’ to the defendant.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-48915189
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/violet-graces-grieving-dad-shares-16571787
“seems unlikely”
“seems unlikely”
but the whole scenario of a judge making such a ruling is unlikely, regardless of the correctness.
hirsute wrote:
hirsute wrote:Was it libellous, made unfounded accusations? As is the case with these sorts of headlines, there is never enough detail for those not there to make a judgement.Mungecrundle wrote:Is there any restriction on publishing the full statement in the national press. Even if it has to be re-written word for word as a non court document?
As the perp was being sentenced, I can’t think that it would be libellous (unless it was a completely irrelevant rant, but that seems unlikely).
Mungecrundle wrote:
Was it libellous, made unfounded accusations?Mungecrundle wrote:Is there any restriction on publishing the full statement in the national press. Even if it has to be re-written word for word as a non court document?
As is the case with these sorts of headlines, there is never enough detail for those not there to make a judgement.
Mungecrundle wrote:
Mungecrundle wrote:Is there any restriction on publishing the full statement in the national press. Even if it has to be re-written word for word as a non court document?
Exactly what I was thinking
Is there any restriction on
Is there any restriction on publishing the full statement in the national press. Even if it has to be re-written word for word as a non court document?
That is so wrong and so sad,
That is so wrong and so sad, that poor family.
The article mentions it has
The article mentions it has happened in two other cases, I’d be curious to know what kind of offenses they involved.
I don’t believe it’s coincidental that this issue came up with a motoring offense. I suspect it’s another symptom of how many in the justice system instinctively identify with the perpetrators in such cases – in a way they are much less prone to with other forms of crime.
Nope, I didn’t.
Nope, I didn’t.
That’s quite abhorrent to me – surely part of justice is giving a voice to the injured parties, not censoring them to protect the guilty from the consequences of their own actions.