- This topic has 22 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 5 months ago by
Fish_n_Chips.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 3, 2018 at 10:16 pm #29180
ilikebikes
Hi,
Thinking of buying a bike for commuting. I have heard a lot about steel bikes being quite comfortable. Rode a heavy dutch bike for a bit – was ok and I am not sure I remember it being especially comfortable.
Are steel bikes worth the additional expense? I could definitely do with a carbon fork – few of roads I cycle on are quite literally a pain in the backside. Not keen on carbon frames and are perhaps expensive. Under £1000 to go with the cycle to work scheme would be brilliant. 🙂
I am battling with the following choices but open to others:
– Decathlon’s Triban RC 500/520
– Boardman ASR 8.8
I have been riding a second hand Giant hybrid with old chainrings and casette/free hub; anything moderately good might be a big upgrade. 🙂
Does anyone have any good recommendations? Thanks
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
ilikebikes
bikezero wrote:
bikezero wrote:The (steel frame/carbon fork) Boardman ASR 8.8 with disc brakes seems impressively quite light at only 11kg with mudguards according the Boardman website. The new (aluminium frame/carbon fork) Triban RC520 (also disc brakes) was reviewed here recently and the review said it clocked 10.7kg on the scales. It doesn’t have mudguards (although they can be fit) so it looks like both those bikes are a very similar overall weight (and price). The cheaper RC500 is probably only fractionally heavier but it seems that Disc brake fans don’t speak so well of it’s lesser quality (cable?) disc brakes when compared to the 520 model. Fairlight is another uk brand that claims to do very light steel frames on their standard steel road bikes.. i think around 9.5kg….but I believe they are a bit pricier (nearer 1.5 grand) so maybe not for you. What about the (aluminium frame/carbon fork) Btwin Triban 500? If you can live without disc brakes that one is only £349 and weighs in the same (10.7kg) as the above other bikes. I’ve used the Btwin Triban 500 for 16 months heavily and it’s a great all round bike for whatever you need to do (it even accepts slightly wider grippier tires if you want to quick-switch wheels and go on some off road trails). The only weak point is the quite poor caliper brakes (I just replace the pads frequently but maybe changing the very cheap unbranded calipers themselves would be a better way to go). I’d be inclined to move quickly if you are interested in the current Btwin Triban range as they might be facing extinction soon given they are a few years old, the new RC models are out and Decathlon say they are dropping the Btwin name altogether on adult bikes. It could also be worth looking at the Btwin Triban 520 and 540 models in that series which see the overall weight drop even slightly more, largely due to lighter groupset I believe. The decals are just stickers on the Btwin Triban 500 whereas on the 520 and 540 models the decals are painted on. Not that sticker decals really bother me in this case as the adhesive seems strong (none peeling away after 16 months) and you can always buy or reprint and replace stickers on a bike if you need to. Personally, if I had a budget of £1000, I’d be looking for a lighter category of aluminium bike altogether (8-9kg) of which there would be quite a few options. In fact the Btwin Ultra 900 AF is 799,99 euros in most Decathlon Europe stores at the moment and it’s sub 9kg. Maybe that isn’t the best choice for you as the frame is quite racey positioned and you say you want to do commuting, but there are a lot of lightweight (8-9kg) aluminium road bikes out there today around the grand price point that do have the slightly more upright “touring” race bike position. Canyon Endurace AL for example which starts at 899 euros on their website (6.0 model with Tiagra) and weighs under 9kg. I haven’t checked but I would guess that for UK customers it’s about £850? If you are intent on disc brakes that changes things because they add to the price quite significantly. If you wanted a sub 9kg aluminjium disc brake bike you’d probably need nearer 1.5 grand to start seeing options. As for alumiunium vs steel, in the price range you are talking about steel bikes tend to be a little heavier than aluminium though maybe not in all cases as the Boardman seems to demonstrate. Personally my next bikes will be aluminium rather than steel or carbon. Steel might be considered the strongest material and more comfortable but I have a steel MTB and I just detest it. That said it weighs around 15.5kg! Generally I find aluminium to be perfectly ok in terms of comfort.The triban RC 500/520 was interesting because of the geometry – prefer a comfortable drop bar bike rather than a racy one. Disc brakes: granted these are not hydraulic but should/may perform better than average rim brakes in the wet(?). I am not sure how fussed I should be re weights ranging from 9kg to 12kg. I do not intend to race to work. hmmm.
On paper boardman bikes in general seem excellent value for money – that was the other attraction.
I think I need to widen my search a bit and look at other AL bikes. Thanks for the info.
ilikebikes
srchar wrote:Ride quality is not strongly correlated with frame material. The design of the frame and, as Bobbinogs says, tyres, have far more effect. For commuting, I would look for something that can take 28s with proper, full mudguards and possibly a rack, to avoid shitty shorts in the rain and a sweaty back in the sun. I would be put off the Boardman due to its cable disc brakes.Are you up for a self-build? If so, take a look at the Kinesis T3.
Don’t think I can trust myself building a bike. C2W may not be possible even if I have it built. 🙁
schlepcycling
Not sure how it would work
Not sure how it would work with the cycle to work scheme but the Planet X London Road or London Road SL might be worth a look. Several different version available with 1x and 2x and with hydraulic brakes all under £1k.
bikezero
The (steel frame/carbon fork)
The (steel frame/carbon fork) Boardman ASR 8.8 with disc brakes seems impressively quite light at only 11kg with mudguards according the Boardman website.
The new (aluminium frame/carbon fork) Triban RC520 (also disc brakes) was reviewed here recently and the review said it clocked 10.7kg on the scales. It doesn’t have mudguards (although they can be fit) so it looks like both those bikes are a very similar overall weight (and price).
The cheaper RC500 is probably only fractionally heavier but it seems that Disc brake fans don’t speak so well of it’s lesser quality (cable?) disc brakes when compared to the 520 model.Fairlight is another uk brand that claims to do very light steel frames on their standard steel road bikes.. i think around 9.5kg….but I believe they are a bit pricier (nearer 1.5 grand) so maybe not for you.
What about the (aluminium frame/carbon fork) Btwin Triban 500? If you can live without disc brakes that one is only £349 and weighs in the same (10.7kg) as the above other bikes. I’ve used the Btwin Triban 500 for 16 months heavily and it’s a great all round bike for whatever you need to do (it even accepts slightly wider grippier tires if you want to quick-switch wheels and go on some off road trails). The only weak point is the quite poor caliper brakes (I just replace the pads frequently but maybe changing the very cheap unbranded calipers themselves would be a better way to go).
I’d be inclined to move quickly if you are interested in the current Btwin Triban range as they might be facing extinction soon given they are a few years old, the new RC models are out and Decathlon say they are dropping the Btwin name altogether on adult bikes.
It could also be worth looking at the Btwin Triban 520 and 540 models in that series which see the overall
weight drop even slightly more, largely due to lighter groupset I believe.
The decals are just stickers on the Btwin Triban 500 whereas on the 520 and 540 models the decals are painted on. Not that sticker decals really bother me in this case as the adhesive seems strong (none peeling away after 16 months) and you can always buy or reprint and replace stickers on a bike if you need to.Personally, if I had a budget of £1000, I’d be looking for a lighter category of aluminium bike altogether (8-9kg) of which there would be quite a few options. In fact the Btwin Ultra 900 AF is 799,99 euros in most Decathlon Europe stores at the moment and it’s sub 9kg. Maybe that isn’t the best choice for you as the frame is quite racey positioned and you say you want to do commuting, but there are a lot of lightweight (8-9kg) aluminium road bikes out there today around the grand price point that do have the slightly more upright “touring” race bike position.
Canyon Endurace AL for example which starts at 899 euros on their website (6.0 model with Tiagra) and weighs under 9kg. I haven’t checked but I would guess that for UK customers it’s about £850?
If you are intent on disc brakes that changes things because they add to the price quite significantly. If you wanted a sub 9kg aluminjium disc brake bike you’d probably need nearer 1.5 grand to start seeing options.
As for alumiunium vs steel, in the price range you are talking about steel bikes tend to be a little heavier than aluminium though maybe not in all cases as the Boardman seems to demonstrate. Personally my next bikes will be aluminium rather than steel or carbon.
Steel might be considered the strongest material and more comfortable but I have a steel MTB and I just detest it. That said it weighs around 15.5kg!
Generally I find aluminium to be perfectly ok in terms of comfort.madcarew
+1 on material is way less
+1 on material is way less important than build. You get fantastic riding alu bikes, and sh*t riding steel and vice-versa. However, I haven’t yet ridden a sh*t riding carbon bike (but admittedly I don’t think I’ve ever ridden a ‘budget’ model carbon bike).
srchar
Ride quality is not strongly
Ride quality is not strongly correlated with frame material. The design of the frame and, as Bobbinogs says, tyres, have far more effect. For commuting, I would look for something that can take 28s with proper, full mudguards and possibly a rack, to avoid shitty shorts in the rain and a sweaty back in the sun. I would be put off the Boardman due to its cable disc brakes.
Are you up for a self-build? If so, take a look at the Kinesis T3.
bobbinogs
A carbon fork won’t do
A carbon fork won’t do anything to help your arse, just ride 28mm tyres with the right pressure (don’t be afraid to experiment).Steel can be wonderfully compliant but you will struggle to get a decent steel bike at that price point. Stress not though, there are loads of other great options in the C2W bracket.
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.