- This topic has 19 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 11 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
So after all the furore around Salbutamol; which, when taken via an inhaler, offers no performance enhancement (http://www.cyclist.co.uk/news/4053/salbutamol-can-be-performance-enhancing-says-wada) and all the accusations of “cheat” and “doper”, I’m curious why no-one has mentioned the drug that ALL pro cyclists are on that is very well proven to be massively performance enhancing.
Caffeine.
Given that caffeine is so potent, why isn’t it banned and why do “we” not consider taking caffeine as cheating?
I know the UCI has a limit on caffeine, 12micrograms per ml urine, but when it is proven to be performance enhancing why is it not more strictly controlled (just like other performance enhancers) yet drugs like Salbutamol (with no known performance benefits) are controlled far more tightly.
I’m not calling for caffeine to be banned (or even controlled more), I’m just confused why “we” accept some performance enhancers, yet reject other substances as cheating (even if they offer no benefits).
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.