- This topic has 21 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 2 months ago by
sergius.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 1, 2018 at 2:47 pm #28192
Big Jay
Hi, I’m upgrading shortly and am on the fence between di2 and eTap, and was after real time feedback. I’ve heard that you can’t trim for example with eTap, which is a constant bug bear of mine but can with Di2. Any other points to note?
Ta
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
sergius
I ended up buying R8070, the
I ended up buying R8070, the new Ultegra Di2. I *love* the hoods.
Massive improvment over the previous version and the e-tap hoods I tried briefly in the LBS.
uscric
Di2 for me because in
Di2 for me because in addition to shifting excellence, the shape of the R9170 Disc lever is awesome and amazingly small. The Etap disc levers are pretty ugly with huge humpbacks.
Nixster
Johnpmc35 wrote:
Johnpmc35 wrote:I too have just decided to go etap, main reason being that my lbs doesn’t think my frame will be able to internally route the di2 cables. I’ve read that I will be best going for sram brake calipers for etap but reviews for the red aero link seem to be mixed. Would the ultegra r8000 calipers prove unsuitable for the etap shifters? I’m also having trouble deciding between the sram red & ultegra r8000 chainset, I’m upgrading my entire group set from Shimano 105. Any advice would be appreciated.Red aerolink calipers I have found don’t keep true very well which can be an irritation. They work fine though in the sense of applying braking to the wheel rim, dura-ace may be better but the Reds are plenty good enough I’d say. They are the lightest of the mainstream options, depends what’s important to you.
I have been told that Etap doesn’t like Shimano chainring spacing although I have also read of others using that combination successfully. It definitely works with Rotor, Cannondale and some more exotic options. Again, the SRAM chainset is considerably lighter (in percentage terms at least). Some people like to have a matching groupset across the whole bike, you may be one of those or not but if you went with Red throughout you wouldn’t be making a bad choice. I use eTap with SRAM and Shimano cassettes, a Rotor chainset and KMC chain and it works fine. I’ve taken a torque wrench to the brakes to address the truing issue but it hasn’t been good enough weather for the best bike to test this yet!
fuel
Johnpmc35 wrote:
Johnpmc35 wrote:I too have just decided to go etap, main reason being that my lbs doesn’t think my frame will be able to internally route the di2 cables. I’ve read that I will be best going for sram brake calipers for etap but reviews for the red aero link seem to be mixed. Would the ultegra r8000 calipers prove unsuitable for the etap shifters? I’m also having trouble deciding between the sram red & ultegra r8000 chainset, I’m upgrading my entire group set from Shimano 105. Any advice would be appreciated.Shimano calipers will work fine with etap. I use the new Dura Ace ones on my setup.
Johnpmc35
I too have just decided to go
I too have just decided to go etap, main reason being that my lbs doesn’t think my frame will be able to internally route the di2 cables.I’ve read that I will be best going for sram brake calipers for etap but reviews for the red aero link seem to be mixed. Would the ultegra r8000 calipers prove unsuitable for the etap shifters? I’m also having trouble deciding between the sram red & ultegra r8000 chainset, I’m upgrading my entire group set from Shimano 105. Any advice would be appreciated.
MoutonDeMontagne
I’ve not used, but have just
I’ve not used, but have just ordered Etap and was having a similar debate to you. I’ll give you the reasons I went for Etap over Di2 incase its helpful.
First and formost was the wireless aspect, and thus the simplicity and lack of bits to connect and go wrong. It also means that I could use my existing best bike frame that is externally routed, rather than switching to the new internally routed version. I also love the clean look of jsut two neatly routed brake cables, no junction boxes or fiddly additions.
Wirelessness aside, I tested Dura-ace Di2 last year and didn’t really like it in terms of ergonomics, hence why going for the sram solution. I found the buttons small and unresponsive, and when wearing gloves despite them not being overly thick, kept catching the wrong button. I like the tactile nature of mechanical, and the ‘one lever one job’ idea (i’ve got doubletap on my winter bike and don’t like that either). Thus when playing with Etap at a bike show, the more pronounced ‘click’ and movement of the lever really appealed to me. No risk of getting the wrong button and thus no changing up rather than down etc. Depending on whether you’ve used either, if you’re in a club maybe try and ask if you can ride their bike around the carpack, or sneak into a shop and press buttons, see which arrangement feels best in the hand.
I appreciate the arguments over customisation, but I’ve always been very happy with slick mechanical, and indeed, were it not for living in a place where cables get shot due to crap weather so frequently, I’d potentially have consided switching to dura ace mecahnical or the new Ultegra and saved myself a wedge. My main criteria is a crisp shift every time, and I’m more than happy to just hold the button to sweep accross the block rather than programme a funtion for it. Likewise, I don’t race and tend to use the same screen on my garmin all ride long so thats not an issue either. For me its one of those functions that sounds great, but I’d probably never use. I guess its up to you how much that matters.
It’s not arrived yet, but depending on your timescale, more than happy to report back on installation, set up and first impressions. FYI Vanilla bikes, Sigma Sport and Wiggle have some great deals on the standard and Disc upgrade kits at the moment (keep your old/choose your own cranks/cassette etc). After asking around in my club, I’ve chosen to go with an Ultegra cassette as by all acounts it makes no difference and they’re £50 as opposed to £200.
Pilot Pete
I’m another Di2 advocate.
I’m another Di2 advocate. However I do have a few comments about earlier posts;
Shifting whilst out of the saddle climbing, or sprinting – well I know it can do it but I personally still think it bad practice which will put unnecessary strain on your components and possibly damage them. It’s no different to mechanical in that respect – but, especially in the case of the front derailleur you have a very powerful servo motor driving the chain from ring to ring, so I cannot see how changing whilst honking on the pedals is anything but bad.
Regarding the comment about length of time to install either system. 20 minutes to fit all your di2 wires – unless you are running a production line how can that possibly be an issue? Would you seriously consider not buying and fitting di2 because it took some 15mins or so longer to install? It surely cannot be a serious consideration when contemplating which groupset. Anyway, from the comments of others it sounds like you could spend considerably longer fitting and adjusting an etap FD so will lose that insignificant time saving anyhow…
Regarding battery life I suspect di2 lasts longer between charges and of course you only have one to think about – simply plug in to Junction A and leave for a few hours. It lasts ages and the previous issue of it running flat whilst out on a ride can easily be avoided by fitting the inline Bluetooth unit which allows you to display di2 battery charge on your Garmin (and I presume other brands of bike computer). I have done this with my latest build and it works really well not only displaying battery life, but gear position and of course allowing you to run eTube software via a tablet using an app wirelessly.
The customisation options with di2 are fantastic, especially being able to configure the system however you want it, from a ‘normal’ setup, to sequential left and right, synchro, semi-synchro etc etc. You can add climbing or sprint shifters, positioning these where you want them. You can now get bikes that secure the battery in the steerer tube of the fork as well as in the seat post.
Also, back to the wiring, it is like a canbus system so you can just plug anything into anywhere, you don’t have to plug each wire into specific terminals. The bar end junction A is neat, but bars that are set up for internal cable routing are limited at present. I opted for a one piece carbon bar/ stem that was semi-internal – wires from the shifters run into dedicated ports towards the stem, but no access into the main bar to get to the bar end. I fitted a stem mount junction A, but did away with the ghastly rubber band and affixed the box mount direct to the stem underside using Sugru – which makes for a very neat and tidy setup.
This leaves two wires eminating from the handlebars which plug into the junction A. They are virtually invisible as there is only a few inches of each from the bar to the junction box. The wire from the junction box into the frame via the headtube access point unites with the rear hydraulic brake hose using spiral wrap as it leaves the junction A until it enters the frame at the same port. Thus you only really see a pair of brake hoses eminating from the bars, which you would see whatever setup you have. It just takes a bit of thought and some experimentation with the wires to see how best to run them to leave the cleanest look. The Bluetooth sender unit can be placed in the frame and does not have to be fitted externally as shown on Shimano docs. Mine works perfectly sat in the downtube.
And finally, the new Dura Ace and Ultegra shifters also have hidden buttons under the rubber hoods, which are again customisable to any function you want. I have set them up to scroll left and right through the pages of my Garmin, which I think is fantastic as you can keep both hands on the hoods whilst changing pages – useful if climbing or descending…
So di2 gets my vote for the many reasons alluded to. I have 9070 on one bike, which is fantastic and have just dived in with 9170 on my recent build, which is even better.
PP
VeloUSA
Big Jay wrote:Is it possible to ‘hide’ the front junction box on Di2 that I see often cable tied to underside of the stem. I have a carbon ergonomic all in one set up.Yes, the EW-SD50 jucntion box A mounts inside your handlebar.
Big Jay
pwake wrote:Just to play devil’s advocate a little… but I’ve used Dura-Ace Di2, SRAM eTap and Record EPS. For me Record EPS wins easily; great feel at the levers, ultra-positive shifting and plenty of adjustment/customisation options in the MyCampy app. And you now have the hydro disc brake option.never considered Campy, is it marmite™ ?
pwake
Just to play devil’s advocate
Just to play devil’s advocate a little… but I’ve used Dura-Ace Di2, SRAM eTap and Record EPS. For me Record EPS wins easily; great feel at the levers, ultra-positive shifting and plenty of adjustment/customisation options in the MyCampy app. And you now have the hydro disc brake option.
Big Jay
sergius wrote:Big Jay wrote:Is it possible to ‘hide’ the front junction box on Di2 that I see often cable tied to underside of the stem. I have a carbon ergonomic all in one set up.Canyon have a one-piece bar/stem combo item with a recess for the junction box. Some high end bikes have junction boxes hidden inside the frame as well.
ah great, mine is the Canyon – I’ll check when I dig it out of hibernation for the upgrades.
sergius
Big Jay wrote:Is it possible to ‘hide’ the front junction box on Di2 that I see often cable tied to underside of the stem. I have a carbon ergonomic all in one set up.Canyon have a one-piece bar/stem combo item with a recess for the junction box. Some high end bikes have junction boxes hidden inside the frame as well.
Big Jay
Is it possible to ‘hide’ the
Is it possible to ‘hide’ the front junction box on Di2 that I see often cable tied to underside of the stem. I have a carbon ergonomic all in one set up.
OrangeRidley
Nixster wrote:I have a season on eTap but not used Di2 in anger.The ergonomics of eTap are for me very intuitive and the positive click you get when you’ve pushed the shift button properly is good feedback as far as I am concerned. I have small hands and have had no issues using it.
If/when fatigued I can see ‘left hand easier, right hand harder’ sticking better in the brain than differentiating between two buttons on the same hand but everyone will be different I expect. Although, as I understand it, Di2 can be configured like that too, it isn’t out of the box.
eTap is easy to install but not simple to get spot on adjusted – the FD is fiddly, the RD much more straightforward.
Ironically I’ve been running 10sp Ultegra mechanical on my winter bike and when well adjusted it has been very satisfying to use! But if you want electronic shifting you’ll get no argument from me.
Yeah I’ve not ridden either but I’ve worked in a shop where the mechanic (Richard Jones of team Ribble) thinks that the fds are a pain in the arse to set up.
Htc
Di2 for me too, I just prefer
Di2 for me too, I just prefer the way the hoods and levers are shaped with Shimano.
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.