Close passing applies to us too

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #27358
    Vehlin

    Grrrr a bit of a rant this one.

    I was cycling on a back road this afternoon, happily bimbling along when I saw a pothole approaching. Moved over by a foot and a half to avoid it and brushed elbows with another cyclist that had decided to overtake.

    It’s not the bloody peloton of the TdF, it was a decent sized straight road with a centre line and no oncoming traffic, there’s no need to be trying to tangle yourself in my cranks.

    Rant over.

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #897393
    0
    Anonymous

    When overtaking give plenty

    When overtaking give plenty of room no matter what the vehicle, as the person in front has priority it is your responsibility to ensure that they and other road users are safe whilst making your maneouvre.

    The overtaker was in the wrong, end of story, if you disagree/won’t accept that, get off the road, hand your motorvehicle licence and bike in and get some training until you undesrstand why you’re wrong!

    #897391
    0
    Mungecrundle

    Chris Hayes wrote:

    Chris Hayes wrote:

    Confession: I sometimes deliberately close-pass cyclists who are using mobile phones if they wobble in my way; usually on the superhighways and parks in Central London.  If you do this, please stop. 

    Does that not constitute a punishment pass?

    However much the behaviour of others may annoy you, you have no right to be handing out the summary justice.

    Or if you are a hypocrit like what I am, you don’t mention it publicly.

    #897389
    0
    Chris Hayes

    Confession: I sometimes

    Confession: I sometimes deliberately close-pass cyclists who are using mobile phones if they wobble in my way; usually on the superhighways and parks in Central London.  If you do this, please stop. 

    #897387
    0
    Yorkshie Whippet

    Interesting to note that if a

    Interesting to note that if a motorist does a close pass it’s pitch forks out and there’ll be a hanging tonight. 

    A fellow cyclist who should be more aware of the road conditions and how cyclist may react, you are at fault!

     

     

    #897385
    0
    don simon fbpe

    OP should have looked behind

    OP should have looked behind or signalled.

    Overtaking cyclist should have given more room.

    Both partly at fault.

    #897383
    0
    hawkinspeter

    It depends on the size of the

    It depends on the size of the pothole. If you only moved out less than a metre or so, then the overtaking cyclist should have left more room and he would be at fault for overtaking when not safe to do so (i.e. He was performing a maneuvre and thus should have anticipated the bad road surface). If you swing out more than about a metre, then I reckon you should have checked first, but with a pothole, you might not have had any choice about it and had to go around for your own safety even if you had checked and seen an overtaking cyclist (the checking would most likely have tipped off the overtaking cyclist that you were about to move, though).

    Overtaking other cyclists should always be performed with a decent safety margin. As an overtaker, you have the better view of the situation and should be able to react quickly enough to avoid getting within “brushing” distance.

    I did get told off the other morning about overtaking a cyclist without using a bell which surprised me as I hardly ever use a bell to warn that I’m overtaking. I left him a good 2 metres of room (I used the other side of the road as he was close to the middle line – only a small back road), so I think I just startled him with a quick silent pass.

    #897381
    0
    Mungecrundle

    Surely on a purely self
    Surely on a purely self interest level the passing cyclist is as likely to be injured as the passed cyclist in the event of a collision so just why would you not pass with a decent gap and a cheery ‘good morning / afternoon’?

    #897379
    0
    climber

    Surely the passing cyclist

    Surely the passing cyclist would have a bit of common and give the inside rider a bit of room. Wasn’t a chain gang after all. Loads in my club have been ‘told off’ for close passes, it’s intimidating for the less ‘initiated’. A bit of empathy is called for here I think.

    #897377
    0
    Vehlin

    brooksby wrote:

    brooksby wrote:

    S’funny: I have never been overtaken by another cyclist who called out or used a bell before or as they were doing so. Never. (I always do, so it grates a little).

    As regards the OPs comments and subsequent replies , don’t we expect *anyone* (motorised or not) to overtake us leaving enough room that if we suddenly have to move because of, say, a pothole then there won’t be a collision…?

    The guy called out as we nearly collided.

    I’m honestly a bit shocked by some of the comments. If you’re passing a bike close enough that it moving half a metre puts you in danger of a collision, you are passing too close.

    Yes I should have shoulder checked, but at the same time I’d not seen another vehicle for 5 mins. The other rider could have passed myself and my 12 imaginary friends in the other lane and still not needed to move back in. I just don’t understand why he’d pass so close when he literally had the entire road to choose from.

    #897375
    0
    brooksby

    S’funny: I have never been

    S’funny: I have never been overtaken by another cyclist who called out or used a bell before or as they were doing so. Never. (I always do, so it grates a little).

    As regards the OPs comments and subsequent replies , don’t we expect *anyone* (motorised or not) to overtake us leaving enough room that if we suddenly have to move because of, say, a pothole then there won’t be a collision…?

    #897373
    0
    Anonymous

    Partly your fault for moving

    Partly your fault for moving out on him, he was probably giving you plenty of room before you did that. 

    #897371
    0
    don simon fbpe
    700c wrote:
    Sounds like he was a bit close but your moving out to avoid pothole may have caught him by surprise. So best to always check before you change road position

    Yeah! Why not a quick look over the shoulder before moving? A quick indication with the hand wouldn’t have gone amiss and marked you out as an experienced rider.  I believe you can get mirrors that clip to the glasses if a quick look is too much travel.

    It’s not a problem I have come across, no one can over take me.

    #897369
    0
    700c

    Sounds like he was a bit

    Sounds like he was a bit close but your moving out to avoid pothole may have caught him by surprise. So best to always check before you change road position

    #897367
    0
    Grahamd
    sergius wrote:
    Dunno, I don’t particularly see anything wrong with passing fairly close to another cyclist (though obviously you wouldn’t to a kid etc); however I always call out before overtaking – they’ve no way of knowing you are there 99% of the time.

    Agree, I’ll usually call out something like “on your right” it’s not difficult.

    #897365
    0
    sergius

    Dunno, I don’t particularly

    Dunno, I don’t particularly see anything wrong with passing fairly close to another cyclist (though obviously you wouldn’t to a kid etc); however I always call out before overtaking – they’ve no way of knowing you are there 99% of the time.

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.