Going out Dressed For War!

  • This topic has 20 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by farrell.
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #24285
    Leviathan

    The other day I was going past Old Trafford and saw someone that make me do a double take. I was waiting at the White City lights and another cyclist was crossing in front of me and I just tracked him with my eyes (sorry no photo, this is my download.) He was riding a red Brompton whilst wearing some black pants, a big Hi Viz jacket with reflective butt flap and a full face mountain bike helmet. It was about 6pm, warm and sunny. Maybe it was the helmet that topped it off, but I was waiting there in a ‘normal’ helmet and short sleeved jersey and bibs. I thought ‘Jeez, what is he dressed up like that for?’

    I know there have been long and contentious debates about the value of any one of these elements and I don’t mean to start another, but I thought the whole ensemble was symptomatic of a defensive attitude. This guy wasn’t dressing for the weather he was dressing for War on the roads. Now maybe he would say that I am just a wannabee pro poring scorn on some canny commuter, but I am concerned that people now have the attitude that they can’t take to the roads without a whole bunch of safety kit. Cycling is becoming denormalized. The last thing I want, is to have to wear a full length fluro winter jacket in +20C temperatures because it expected as part of a potential liability case; no jacket, feel free to crash into me.

    Sorry I am probably preaching to the choir as another bunch of roadies, but I would like to talk to this guy and find out what thought process made him buy each one of these items, and how does he think it makes him safer, or anyone else. Particularly on the jacket issue I think herd immunity and normalizing clothing for riding is more important, don’t train drivers to just watch out for the yellow. [Or maybe I just think Hi Viz looks stupid and will say anything to justify not wearing it; please feel free to trash my opinion.]

Viewing 5 replies - 16 through 20 (of 20 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #851149
    0
    felixcat

    bikeboy76 wrote:
    Pants is not

    bikeboy76 wrote:

    Pants is not an americanism, but a perfectly acceptable synonym for trousers. Underpants are a garment worn under pants, obviously. Corrupting underpants to ‘pants does not negate its original meaning. Now Swing you pants.

    The Shorter Oxford defines pants.
    a. U.S. Trousers.
    b. In British use, men’s drawers.

    #851147
    0
    Leviathan

    DaSy wrote:Are you using

    DaSy wrote:
    Are you using pants in the American way, as in trousers, or was he actually wearing underpants, jacket and full face lid?

    I too will do anything to avoid ever wearing high-vis, it is just a step too far


    Pants is not an americanism, but a perfectly acceptable synonym for trousers. Underpants are a garment worn under pants, obviously. Corrupting underpants to ‘pants does not negate its original meaning. Now Swing you pants.

    #851145
    0
    Anonymous

    Are you using pants in the
    Are you using pants in the American way, as in trousers, or was he actually wearing underpants, jacket and full face lid?

    I too will do anything to avoid ever wearing high-vis, it is just a step too far.

    Incidentally, I once caught up with a woman in a Range Rover who had cut me up at a junction, and when I quizzed her about her inability to drive properly, she said it can’t matter to me because I didn’t have a helmet on! Apparently if I don’t armour-up then it is perfectly okay to run me down…

    #851143
    0
    farrell

    The jacket could just be his
    The jacket could just be his ‘go to’ cycling jacket, I’m sure you appreciate the arse flap makes sense in Manchester due to the cities levels of rainfall and our stepchild-beater lead councils inability to install drainage systems that match this rainfall.

    As for the helmet, he could have been going out MTBing later or had just picked up/bought the helmet and wearing it was slightly easier than carrying it?

    He could have just been a loon.

    #851141
    0
    bikebot

    No comment.
    No comment.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGGajrxWYAAaBYJ.jpg

Viewing 5 replies - 16 through 20 (of 20 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.