Froome vs Contador, are the numbers believable ?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #23382
    ianrobo

    This is Dr Doping saying this so if he says the numbers are ‘stratospheric’ then should we be listening to him ?

    http://53×12.com/do/show?page=indepth.view&id=154

    “In the last 6’40” of the race the Englishman gave 29″ to the Spanish: the VAM was a stratospheric 2059 m/h (6.86 w/kg), with Alberto climbing at 1938 m/h (6.46 w/kg).”

Viewing 4 replies - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #834171
    0
    Flying Scot

    I’m not making apologies for
    I’m not making apologies for the man, but it read a few of his blog pieces, and the ones not relating to his own defence are actually fairly good, he is probably the foremost authority on cycling performance, legal or illegal.

    He remains a staunch supporter of Graeme Obree and speaks openly of the way the UCI destroyed GO’s career. And Graeme of course if staunchly anti doping.

    Ferrari is of course, rightly banned in my opinion.

    #834169
    0
    bashthebox

    Funny how he’s saying Froome
    Funny how he’s saying Froome and Bertie are dopers, and yet handily doesn’t allude to his (alleged) rider, Nibali, showing numbers that push well into the traditional doping levels here: http://53×12.com/do/show?page=indepth.view&id=148.

    #834167
    0
    dotdash

    Just reading some of his
    Just reading some of his other articles and the total horse shit that comes from him is quite amazing.

    Not even worth bothering with.

    #834165
    0
    dotdash

    He’s basing these on
    He’s basing these on different distances for one the stages Contador won he’s used distance and the Froome one he is using time.

    He even admits that in stage 3 from came back towards the end of the stage which shows he had more power towards the end.

Viewing 4 replies - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.