log in
register

Spa Audax or similar

  • Creator
    Topic
  • June 16, 2014 at 8:51 pm #21703
    Topcat

    I’m currently trying to decide my next purchase and looking for the input of the more experienced of you! I’m looking to build up an everyday/long distance bike. I love my CAAD 8 but carrying all my work gear or clothes for a weekend away is a real pain in a rucksack.

    I’ve really got carried away looking at Bob Jackson, Mercian and Condor frames but decided to spend less as the bike may spend time chained up outside my work or in North London; so it’s going to get knocked about and I don’t want it to be too desirable to thieves.

    Does anyone on here own a Spa Audax? It seems to be the perfect steel frame to build an all rounder on a budget. I have considered the Genesis Equilibrium but realise that it does not have rack mounts and is more expensive. The only downsides I can see is that there are a few comments about the Spa frame seeming a little agricultural and having a short head tube.

    I’m considering using Camagnolo Centaur/Veloce mix on this bike as I have Shimano 105 on my CAAD and think I prefer the shape of the Campag shifters. Does this seem like a sensible choice over Shimano for this sort of bike given how Shimano seems to be the most dominant brand?

    Any thoughts or comments are much appreciated.

  • Creator
    Topic
Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
1 2
  • Author
    Replies
  • January 12, 2021 at 9:24 pm #799603
    0
    Topcat
    pashtag wrote:
    Did you buy one in the end?

    No, I built up a Surly LHT and went for 2 weeks from Avignon to Salzburg. Then 3 months solo round Europe the next Summer. Then 2 1/2 months from Bucharest, through the Balkans, up to Ukraine and home.

    Now the itch for another bike has set in and I found my old thread come up on google as I consider a Spa audax again!

    https://cdn.road.cc/wp-content/uploads/roadcc/bike_1.JPG

    January 12, 2021 at 9:22 pm #799617
    0
    Topcat

    I think I will! Thanks

    I think I will! Thanks

    January 12, 2021 at 8:59 pm #799615
    0
    Richbeck

    My do it all bike – Reynolds
    My do it all bike – Reynolds 853 which I would happily ride all day with a smile on my face!

    Full braze ons for rack etc although very happy with Carradice Nelson on the back.

    Get one – you won’t regret it!!

    January 12, 2021 at 8:43 pm #799613
    0
    Topcat

    How do you like it? I looks

    How do you like it? I looks great with the amber wall tyres!

    January 12, 2021 at 8:42 pm #799611
    0
    Topcat

    No, I suspect it won’t be a

    No, I suspect it won’t be a possible or sensible thing to do for a while now!

    It’s a shame as my fitness could use a trip like that!

    January 12, 2021 at 1:07 pm #799609
    0
    Richbeck

    Longstaff – now built by
    Longstaff – now built by Jason Rourke.

    Here’s my older version with its new Middleburn cranks.

    https://cdn.road.cc/wp-content/uploads/roadcc/20201222_101917_0.jpg

    January 11, 2021 at 10:32 pm #799607
    0
    David9694

    Well, there’ll be none of

    Well, there’ll be none of your carefree gallivanting around Europe this year, Mister, and that’s no error.

    January 11, 2021 at 7:44 pm #799605
    0
    wtjs

    Steel ‘gravel bike’ with

    Steel ‘gravel bike’ with mudguard and rack fittings, no cables through the frame, drop bars, 9-speed Sora, 48/32 or 46/30, tubeless ready rims, 12 mm through axle, 37 mm tyres, TRP Spyre twin piston flatmount cable discs. Wonderful.

    March 30, 2017 at 7:57 pm #799601
    0
    pashtag

    Did you buy one in the end?

    Did you buy one in the end?

    August 20, 2014 at 8:59 pm #799599
    0
    Topcat

    I’ve been in contact with Spa
    I’ve been in contact with Spa who have been very helpful. Apparently I’m between the sizes of 54 and 56; this is the same conclusion I came to from looking at the geometry chart.

    I wondered if anyone could give me any insight and save me a 500 mile round trip to test ride one. I have attached the geometry chart to this post. I am 6′ tall with a 32″ to 32.5″ inseam. I currently ride a Cannondale CAAD 8 in 56cm with a 110cm stem, this has a top tube of 560mm at an angle of 73.5. I’m not sure if it is wise to move to a bike with a slightly longer head tube.

    June 17, 2014 at 10:00 pm #799597
    0
    Topcat

    Thank you all for a great
    Thank you all for a great response! After looking into groupsets I may go Shimano 105 again as it seems to be available for only a small amount more than tiagra at the moment.

    I think the Spa Audax is the one I’m going to go for. The YACF forum has a lot of discussion on it and generally it seems very well received. I think really I’ve got carried away looking at more exciting frames and forgetting the purpose of an all-rounder, the Spa ticks most of the boxes and if I really get sick of black (my last two bikes were black) I can always paint it!

    I will let you all know how I get on, it is just a shame that Harrogate is so far away from Sussex.

    June 17, 2014 at 1:20 pm #799595
    0
    alotronic

    Head tube height – horses for
    Head tube height – horses for courses. I like a short head tube and longer top tube as I have a longer body relative to legs. 90% of ‘sportive’ geometry bikes would drive me nuts! The only thing to note about the Spa is that it does have a long top tube in the smaller sizes (52 and under from memory) it’s 1.5cm longer than most at that size. The advantage is tons of ‘toe clip’ clearance. The disadvantage is running a slightly shorter stem. If you were built the other way to me (long legs short body) you might find it an issue. For the price – great. Other wise the Hewitt or Thorn Audax or maybe Bob Jackson but the Spa is the cheapest decent steel frame out there for sure.

    In the flesh the steel bike looks very unassuming and not very nickable.

    A

    PS as you can tell I’ve been looking into the same question at the moment :B

    June 17, 2014 at 1:02 pm #799593
    0
    jeepie

    Hi – yep. I’ve got a Spa
    Hi – yep. I’ve got a Spa Audax and signed up specifically to answer this. I bought the built up Titanium one with SRAM Apex and I love it. Can’t comment on the frame being agricultural as to me it appears to be a great frame and it’s very light and the bike as a whole is a joy. You are right that I have a lot of spacers on the bike – that’s how it came….doesn’t seem to make a difference……I’m not an expert on the spacers vs headtube argument so can’t really comment. I ride the bike to work every day and really enjoy it. I also enjoyed the buying experience from Spa from whom I got great service.

    June 17, 2014 at 10:25 am #799591
    0
    alotronic

    Hi Matey
    YACF best place for
    Hi Matey

    YACF best place for talk about the Spa – start here:

    https://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=73529.0

    Or run a search.

    June 17, 2014 at 7:55 am #799589
    0
    Nick T

    Remember the formula for
    Remember the formula for Shimano rear mech compatibility:

    (Front big – front small) + (cassette big – cassette small) = n

    eg; (50 – 34 = 16) + (30 – 12 = 18) = 34

    If your result is over 33 then Shimano recommend you buy a long cage mech.

    All Campagnolo 11s, either standard or compact, will take a 29t on the back.

  • Author
    Replies
Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
1 2
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.