PCS

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #21082
    simon F

    Interesting that the game has a week off and PCS tweet…

    [quote]Pro Cycling Stats ‏@ProCyclingStats
    According our analytics people aren’t really interested in the races of these days.
    [/quote]

    Maybe they should be thanking road.cc for the traffic.

Viewing 4 replies - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #784415
    0
    enrique

    Gkam84 wrote:I don’t mind

    Gkam84 wrote:
    I don’t mind them… making their site, but to try and make out its… worth people paying money…

    I don’t get this. How is it they’re trying to make money? Who pays them? Users? Advertisers? And why is this offensive to you? :/

    #784413
    0
    Gkam84

    I don’t mind them taking data
    I don’t mind them taking data and making their site, but to try and make out its unique and worth people paying money, advertising and also their new app’s they are going to be launching is in my eyes wrong.

    I prefer using sites that are around for the benefit of cycling fans, not ones who are just trying to cash in. So I using Cycling Archives and Cycling Quotient. I avoid PCS like the plague and will not use it.

    #784411
    0
    Twybaydos

    Is this the only reason you
    Is this the only reason you (and others) don’t like PCS Gkam? Because they take publicly available information and present it in an easy to use way for filthy profit.

    Whilst I value what cycling fever is trying to do, it’s a horrible looking site. Plus I have adblocker on.

    Advertising wise – It’s not as bad as Cycling News.

    #784409
    0
    Gkam84

    No, they should be thanking
    No, they should be thanking Wikipedia, the UCI and all the teams.

    All the do is recycle information and are trying to make money from it.

    They should mostly thank http://www.cyclingarchives.com because they have ripped alot of information from there

Viewing 4 replies - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.