Tirreno-Adriatico

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #20895
    drheaton

    This competition is pretty much ready to go and should be open tomorrow.

    Some things to note on scoring, there is only one category of climb in the race which means all climbs score the same points in this race and in the fantasy game which will be 5, 3, 2 & 1 for the first four over the summit.

    The race starts with a TTT on Wednesday afternoon followed by 5 stages before an ITT to finish.  So far the start time for the first stage is the only one that has been announced.  Hopefully the rest are confirmed before the race starts but if not we'll need to set early transfer deadlines to make sure that the window closes before the stage starts each day so bare that in mind and check the 'stages' page for the race each day to make sure you know when the deadlines will be for each stage.

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 75 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #779585
    0
    Joelsim

    Yay, 139 for me today.
    And 5

    Yay, 139 for me today.

    And 5 transfers done and filled the team with sprint talent for tomorrow.

    #779583
    0
    simon F

    GC
    1 132 CAVENDISH Mark
    2 133

    GC

    1 132 CAVENDISH Mark
    2 133 KWIATKOWSKI Michal
    3 131 URAN URAN Rigoberto
    4 137 RENSHAW Mark
    5 136 POELS Wouter
    6 135 PETACCHI Alessandro +2″
    7 134 MARTIN Tony +3″
    8 148 IMPEY Daryl +11″
    9 144 CLARKE Simon +11″
    10 142 DURBRIDGE Luke +11″

    #779581
    0
    enrique

    Dave Atkinson wrote:Classics

    Dave Atkinson wrote:
    Classics is hard to say because the field changes completely for each race. but here’s some others:

    TDU: 138
    TOQ: 134
    TMD: 148
    TOO: 142
    VAA: 146
    PNI: 140

    Wow. Nice! 🙂 I can’t wait to see what your fascinating equation yields for the Dauphine, the TDS and Tour! I like the idea of setting the budgets at 140 for the smaller races and 150 for the Classics, Paris Nice and Tirreno. Of course, I’d love to see 175, as was suggested last year, for the Tour! When I think we only had one (!) 3.0 rider? Maybe I’m wrong about that 😕 🙂

    #779579
    0
    chrisdstripes

    I can’t look at the cycling
    I can’t look at the cycling websites in case I see the Paris-Nice result, watching it now. Was definitely Cav 1st tho.

    #779577
    0
    dave atkinson

    enrique wrote:I don’t know if

    enrique wrote:
    I don’t know if I saved them but it might be pretty cool to see the average rider values for the races we’ve already done just to compare! It’d be nice to see what your ‘tool’ suggested for the Classics and Paris Nice.

    Classics is hard to say because the field changes completely for each race. but here’s some others:

    TDU: 138
    TOQ: 134
    TMD: 148
    TOO: 142
    VAA: 146
    PNI: 140

    #779575
    0
    backflipbedlem

    Anyone know what order Omega
    Anyone know what order Omega crossed the line?
    Or have the GC positions?

    #779573
    0
    chrisdstripes

    Yep, you’ll get GC points, so
    Yep, you’ll get GC points, so Cav gets a 10-point bonus etc…
    I had 2 OPQ, 2 Orica, 1 Movistar (no Sky) and the rest for tomorrow, so went as well as I could have hoped, maybe even a couple of points for my 3.0 riders…

    #779571
    0
    backflipbedlem

    Well I make it 142 points.
    Do

    Well I make it 142 points.
    Do u get GC points in a TTT?

    #779569
    0
    chrisdstripes

    How many good TTTs do
    How many good TTTs do Movistar have to ride before Eurosport commentators stop being suprised?

    #779567
    0
    backflipbedlem

    backflipbedlem wrote:Used my

    backflipbedlem wrote:
    Used my Purist team to go for the TTT.

    2 OPQS
    2 Orica
    2 Mov
    2 Sky
    1 Tinkoff

    And filled my Standard with Sprinters for tomorrow.


    Well with Cannondale ahead of Sky, that’s my attempt buggered!

    #779565
    0
    livestrongnick

    Dave Atkinson wrote:Twybaydos

    Dave Atkinson wrote:
    Twybaydos wrote:
    Did anyone not pick Arredondo?

    arredondo: CHECK :-)

    Double check :H

    #779563
    0
    cherrypicked

    Need some value in the low
    Need some value in the low end to assist with picking different riders

    #779561
    0
    drheaton

    Joelsim wrote:The lower the

    Joelsim wrote:
    The lower the budget, the more differences surely? We don’t want everyone picking the same team.

    Pretty much, rather than everyone picking the best 5 guys and the difference being the cheap riders a low budget means you need to pick which of the favourites you want.

    #779559
    0
    Joelsim

    The lower the budget, the
    The lower the budget, the more differences surely? We don’t want everyone picking the same team.

    #779557
    0
    enrique

    Dave Atkinson wrote:we now

    Dave Atkinson wrote:
    we now have a handy back-end tool that works out an average rider value based on the startlist, and does a back-of-a-fag-packet calculation to suggest a competition budget….

    How can you not love a man like you? That’s pretty cool, Dave! I love it! 😀

    Dave Atkinson wrote:
    [I]t suggested a good budget for TA might be 152 :evil:

    Heh heh! Awesome! I hope you trust it enough for the next races! It might be pretty cool! I wonder what it will suggest for the Tour? 😕 I don’t know if I saved them but it might be pretty cool to see the average rider values for the races we’ve already done just to compare! It’d be nice to see what your ‘tool’ suggested for the Classics and Paris Nice. I wonder what’s a better indicator of field strength? Total value of the field or average rider value? I might take a look at total value… The difference between races might be more apparent…. You’re awesome, Dave, I mean it! 🙂

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 75 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.