- This topic has 7 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 8 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
A lot of parallels between dangerous dogs and cars. You bring this thing of yours out into the public domain, you insist that it is harmless, wouldn’t hurt anybody, but you’re clearly not in control of it. There is no good reason to have this known extra harm potential. Someone else picks up the pieces from your crap decision-making, don’t they.
You defend it, despite mounting evidence of the harm it causes. You deflect – it’s a rogue element, regulation won’t work on rogue elements. You say that if there is regulation that aspects of the situation will only get worse – all your roads try to lead to the situation being left. The near misses, the incidents – we all get to live in its shadow, never knowing when or where it will strike.
One thing for sure is there that is zero benefit to me in these things being around, only the potential for me to come to harm. You transfer the risk of harm to me. I have to change my behaviour to reduce my risk exposure. Please don’t tell me you want my sympathy – you know fine what these things are. Stop gambling with my money.
Get the ban done.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.