- This topic has 17 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 7 months ago by
chrisonabike.
-
CreatorTopic
-
October 24, 2022 at 6:56 am #32306
Rendel Harris
I think the images below tell the story.
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
chrisonabike
Well, depending on the
Well, depending on the historical period of the area conservation of life and livelihood might not be in keeping. Particularly those of people who don’t own the big houses or drive large carriages.
The garish attention-seeking bling of our ancestors has now become etc.
Rendel Harris
bikes wrote:
bikes wrote:He thinks these look ‘quite terrible’. What does he think about everything else on the roads eg the traffic lights, pedestrian barriers, road signs etc?“What’s meant to be a conservation area” – conservation of life not important, obviously. You’d think high-speed highways running through a conservation area might spoil the look of the place a bit, but apparently not.
bikes
He thinks these look ‘quite
He thinks these look ‘quite terrible’. What does he think about everything else on the roads eg the traffic lights, pedestrian barriers, road signs etc?IanMSpencer
Cllr Andy Morgan, who represents the Heaton and Lostock ward said: “It’s been a massive issue for the last 12 months.
“People really took a dislike to the orca wands not just because of the physical look of them look of them, which is quite terrible, in what’s meant to be a conservation area but also because of the congestion they caused.”
I need to get my head around that one, a physical barrier to an area where no vehicles are legally allowed to enter causes congestion.

chrisonabike
Blimey. I’ve not been
Blimey. I’ve not been accused of subtlety before. Good point though on communication though.
wtjs
Not being able to see
Not being able to see Councillor Morgan’s tweets looks like an unexpected benefit. This is a very bad decision by Bolton Council- no doubt facilitated by a desire to appease the hyper-junk press and its misguided readers. Why were the malevolent drivers so keen on removing the wands? So that they could drive in the cycle lane whenever they wish!.. and if they hit a cyclist they can always claim that he couldn’t be seen because of ‘not enough H-i-Viz’, ‘sun in my eyes so I had to keep driving to get out of trouble’ or whatever the shyster lawyers dream up in return for payment.
While the wands were in place, there were loads of cars always parked between them
The answer to this is not to blame the cyclists for causing illegal parking by demanding a sanctuary which is then abused by dimwits, it’s enforcement of parking regulations
the little onion
*too suble for monday morning
*too suble for monday morning* (also, falls foul of Poe’s law)
jpj84
While the wands were in place
While the wands were in place, there were loads of cars always parked between them. Bolton is a terrible place for a cyclist ?
Hirsute
They were being sarcastic.
They were being sarcastic.
the little onion
Not trolling – just pointing
Not trolling – just pointing out the hypocrisy of stating that you are happy for protection to be loosened, and then sad that people die when no longer protected. Or alternatively, they are so ignorant that they think magic paint protects cyclists.
chrisonabike
My thoughts with the friends
My thoughts with the friends and family of the deceased.
You’re just trolling Rendel. The councillor was following the will of the people (having worked hard to get it – “…in some way against…”) and although we build roads and licence driving any problems are clearly either freak accidents or the one-off actions of rogue drivers and in no way the responsibility of those who facilitated driving and not active travel (or who deprecated enforcement of safety on roads).
Rendel Harris
.
.

Rendel Harris
.
.

Rendel Harris
.
.

Rendel Harris
.
.

-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.