- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
5 comments
Jesus christ. Lets hope his next crash just takes him out and him alone. With his record he will Surely do it again.
Unfortunately he's entitled to apply for his licence back.
Lets hope someone has a quiet word in the examiners ear just before the extended test is carried out. He shouldn't be on the roads its as simple as that.
I guess, but it just seems so unfair that he can kill someone - unintentionally, but still... - and then ask for his licence back just because it is "inconvenient" for him not being able to drive.
Amen to that!
OK, so that's horrible (and I don't just mean having to read the Mirror website). I wish the judge had held their nerve and left the ban in place: as they said, "a driving ban is supposed to be inconvenient".
They're all just following the law. People need to stop voting for shit politicians because they're their tribe's colour.
Anyway, remember, justice is always just a baseball bat away.