[ceepeeee]

Sneaked out cycling related gear again, that is. This time though they haven’t bothered to use the c word at all, though I can’t see why else you’d need reflectives on your shorts. I’ve owned the trousers for a while and they’ve performed pretty well, as long as you forget about the advertised water resistance.

http://www.marksandspencer.com/cotton-rich-reflective-shorts-with-stormwear/p/p22370365

Topic

[CygnusX1]

monkeytrousers wrote:Where

monkeytrousers wrote:

Where does it say in the description anything about having reflective stuff?

Other than the name of course?

It doesn’t. But if you look at the photos on the product page, the last one shows the hem turned up to show a reflective strip sewn into the inside.

[monkeytrousers]

Where does it say in the
Where does it say in the description anything about having reflective stuff?

Other than the name of course?

[Dr_Lex]

Hmmm- more like a looser,
Hmmm- more like a looser, less colourful version of the Randonee shorts (http://www.rapha.cc/gb/en/shop/randonee-shorts/product/RDS03)

[bauchlebastart]

Very much like Rapha Touring
Very much like Rapha Touring shorts

[Gkam84]

They look more like
They look more like hiking/walking shorts, that’ll be why there is no cycling label attached to them

[Author]

Replies