Is this the best carbon crankset on the market? With its sleek aesthetics and perfect tolerances, it stands out as much for its looks as it does for its performance. The only real drawback is the premium price tag.

 

Hope Carbon Crankset – Technical details

Hope would likely agree that this crankset hasn’t been designed solely with low weight in mind—often the primary assumption when it comes to carbon components. Instead, its construction prioritises strength and vibration damping, with weight savings a welcome secondary benefit.

Hope Carbon Crankset carbon.jpg
Hope Carbon Crankset carbon (Image Credit: Matthew Page)
Hope Carbon Crankset carbon.jpg, by Matthew Page

The crank arms feature an internal layup of T700 carbon fibre and a foam core, topped with a 1K weave outer layer that gives a premium, refined finish. A choice of coloured accents around the pedal thread inserts and self-extracting bolt area allows the crankset to be matched with other components in Hope’s range. Six colour options are available: black, silver, blue, red, purple, and orange.

Hope Carbon Crankset pedal thread.jpg
Hope Carbon Crankset pedal thread (Image Credit: Matthew Page)
Hope Carbon Crankset pedal thread.jpg, by Matthew Page

Carbon cranksets have occasionally suffered from issues where pedal thread inserts are permanently bonded and prone to failure over time. Hope has tackled this by making the inserts replaceable, effectively eliminating the risk of bonding failures and extending the service life of the crankset in the event of damage or wear.

The crankset is available in 155mm, 165mm, and 170mm arm lengths, making it one of the very few carbon options to offer a 155mm length. The 30mm aluminium axle is offered in several lengths to suit various chain lines for MTB standard, Boost, and Super Boost, and Hope provides a comprehensive guide to help users choose the correct configuration.

The 30mm axle is supported with virtually all bottom bracket standards, and Hope has standard and ceramic BB options for press-fit and threaded frames.

Hope Carbon Crankset Pair.jpg
Hope Carbon Crankset Pair (Image Credit: Matthew Page)
Hope Carbon Crankset Pair.jpg, by Matthew Page

Hope lists a claimed weight of 422g for the crankset. The sample on test, with 155mm arms and a 156mm axle, weighed in at 419g—split as 247g for the non-drive-side arm and axle, and 168g for the drive-side arm. The crank arms are supplied with rubber end protectors, weighing 10g per pair. A 34-tooth direct-mount chainring adds 75g, bringing the total system weight to 490g, or 500g with the protectors fitted.

The maximum combined rider and bike weight is 130kg, though Hope provides specific weight limits depending on the intended riding discipline—trail, all-mountain, or enduro.

Hope Carbon Crankset – Performance

Fitting the crankset was straightforward, with all components having precise construction and tight tolerances. The self-extracting bolt mates perfectly with a Werx 10mm hex wrench, with no unwanted play. When paired with a Hope press-fit bottom bracket, there was no lateral movement or play against the bearings. Installing the chainring was similarly hassle-free, and it’s a welcome touch that Hope includes the required lockring tool in the box — something not all brands provide. The tool itself also fits precisely, ensuring a secure installation.

Hope Carbon Crankset Tool.jpg
Hope Carbon Crankset Tool (Image Credit: Matthew Page)
Hope Carbon Crankset Tool.jpg, by Matthew Page

The crank arms come with optional rubber end protectors, which are quick and easy to fit if you choose to use them. Hope also supplies clear protective film for the face of each arm — a common addition for carbon cranksets, though it’s often factory-applied by other brands. In this case, the film is thin and the adhesive is weak, with some peeling that began after only a few rides, and I soon had to remove it.

While this film won’t be a concern for every rider — it’s mainly there to guard against heel rub — it’s still a useful inclusion to help preserve the carbon finish over time. Factory application or a higher-quality adhesive would likely result in a neater and more durable finish.

Hope Carbon Crankset Bubbles.jpg
Hope Carbon Crankset Bubbles (Image Credit: Matthew Page)
Hope Carbon Crankset Bubbles.jpg, by Matthew Page

Out on the trail, the crankset performed faultlessly. It quickly became one of those components that simply does its job and fades into the background — a good sign. Even when deliberately trying to detect flex or compromises under load, the cranks delivered consistent, solid performance. Hope claims the construction is designed to dampen vibrations. While I’ve not had significant issues with vibration from other cranksets, the Hope Carbon felt equally composed and comfortable.

The availability of different axle lengths and the adjustable chainline, when used with Hope’s spiderless chainrings, helps future-proof the crankset. Given Hope’s strong track record for supporting legacy components and providing spares, it’s reassuring to know this crankset should remain compatible regardless of how standards evolve.

Hope Carbon Crankset axle.jpg
Hope Carbon Crankset axle (Image Credit: Matthew Page)
Hope Carbon Crankset axle.jpg, by Matthew Page

For those chasing grams, there are lighter options on the market. The e*thirteen XCX Race, for instance, claims a sub-360g weight; it is over 50g lighter than the Hope Carbon. Among more mainstream offerings, the SRAM Eagle XX1 DUB SL comes in at 433g, while the Shimano XTR lands at 472g. However, most alternatives offer fewer length options; even SRAM’s expanding range still bottoms out at 165mm within the XX1 SL line.

Hope Carbon Crankset Fitted.jpg
Hope Carbon Crankset Fitted (Image Credit: Matthew Page)
Hope Carbon Crankset Fitted.jpg, by Matthew Page

That said, the real-world performance gains between these cranksets are likely marginal. Crucially, I encountered no notable drawbacks with the Hope Carbon, and the replaceable pedal thread inserts give added peace of mind by eliminating a known weak point in many carbon cranksets. The flawless 1K carbon weave finish adds a final touch of refinement.

Hope Carbon Crankset – Verdict

The only real drawback is the price, especially given that Hope’s own aluminium Evo crankset offers strong competition within the brand’s line-up. While Hope hasn’t published lab data, I’d expect the Carbon version to outperform the Evo in terms of stiffness. On the trail, though, the difference is negligible. With the Evo priced at £285 — less than half the cost of the Carbon — it’s a compelling alternative.

Looking beyond Hope’s range, the Race Face Era costs £449 and is available in 160–175mm lengths. The e*thirteen XCX Race, priced at £440, is lighter but aimed more at XC riders, and limited to 170 and 175mm sizes. Notably, both these options use bonded-in pedal inserts, unlike the Hope.

If Hope were to factory-apply the protective film or improve the adhesive quality, there would be little to criticise in terms of performance. The Carbon crankset looks superb — and that’s exactly how you’ll want it to stay. Beyond the visual appeal, it delivers impressively across stiffness, weight, durability, and serviceability, with custom colour options to match your build.

You might also like:

Test report Hope Carbon Crankset review £575.00

Chainsets and chainrings

Product purpose: 

Hope says:

The Carbon crank has been designed to maximise the advantages of carbon fibre, through a unique construction method whilst using very small aluminium inserts to keep weight down. This, coupled with an optimised lay-up, ensures a good balance between ride feel, stiffness, and isolation from trail chatter.

Build extra: 

Hope lists:

>> Tuned stiffness characteristics for optimum ride feel
>> 1K outer fabric has greater abrasion resistance and gives the unique ‘Hope’ carbon aesthetic
>> Replaceable pedal thread inserts
>> Foam core helps to absorb impacts and dampen vibrations
>> T700 fibres for optimum strength to weight
>> Unique carbon construction method
>> Proven self-extracting axle/arm interface from our EVO cranks
>> 155, 165 & 170mm length
>> 30mm oversize 7075 aluminium alloy axle
>> Configurable for 52 and 55mm chainlines
>> Weight from: 156mm 422g w/o chainring, 487g with 32t chainring
>> Direct mount chainring only, Spiderless Retainer chainrings 28T to 36T
>> Q‐Factor 168mm Boost/176mm 55mm
>> Recommended use Trail/All mountain

Product construction 


Product construction extra: 

Impeccable, with good tolerances on all parts. The only poor area is the clear protective film provided, but not installed as standard, which has poor adhesion.

Product performance 


Product durability 


Product durability extra: 

I have no doubt they will last well structurally, but visibly having better, and factory installed protection film would help.

Product weight 


Product weight extra: 

Not the lightest carbon crankset available, but still lighter than SRAM and Shimano options.

Product comfort 


Product comfort extra: 

No discomfort or vibrations were noticed through the pedals.

product value 


All the deals displayed on our review pages are pulled from a constantly updating database feed of the best affiliate deals available. The criteria for deciding on what are the best deals is who is offering the lowest, delivered price. In most cases we will be showing the very best deal available online, but sometimes you may be able to find an item cheaper. If you can please feel free to post a link in the comments box below. To find out more about affiliate links on road.cc click here.

Product value extra: 

Difficult to justify over the alloy Evo crankset, which is half the price.

Overall performance: 

Easy to fit, perfect in use.

Product likes: 

Well-crafted and excellent tolerances with the provided tool. Good stiffness, and when combined with a Hope bottom bracket there was no play at all.

Product dislikes: 

The protective film included has poor adhesion with bubbles that appeared early after fitting.

Enjoy: 

Yes

Buy: 

If I had the money and wanted the best

Recommend: 

Yes, for those with a plentiful budget

Conclusion: 

The main reason to choose them over the alloy Evo for the average rider is on looks, if you like carbon.