Another great Hate Mail article… discuss!

Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #938391
    0
    Capercaillie

    nicmason wrote:

    nicmason wrote:

    Nasty article but its a fair point about towpaths. They are narrow and not designed for high speed cycling. The speed limit for a barge in the canal is 4 mph and imo that woud be a good speed limit for a cyclist on the towpath unless there are no pedestrians in sight.


    I ran a half marathon in 2 hours. That’s 6.5 miles an hour. An elite athlete can run at nearly twice that pace. Should all runners be banned from towpaths too then?

    #938389
    0
    Luca Patrono

    nicmason wrote:

    nicmason wrote:

    Nasty article but its a fair point about towpaths. They are narrow and not designed for high speed cycling. The speed limit for a barge in the canal is 4 mph and imo that woud be a good speed limit for a cyclist on the towpath unless there are no pedestrians in sight.

    Insane. I do a lot of towpath cycling and there is absolutely no reason to be doing a general 4mph. That’s barely faster than walking speed. Even the advocated 10mph limit is too low – if I’m not within braking distance of a pedestrian or a side path where dogs and pedestrians can run out, then what speed I do is no one’s business but mine.

    Pass pedestrians at a safe speed, yes, but otherwise, do whatever speed is safe for the surface, which is what most people do.

    #938387
    0
    ktache

    If whilst riding on a towpath

    If whilst riding on a towpath, which I do regularly, I was creating a wake that destroyed the river or canal bank, then your ridiculous 4 mph limit would make sense.  

    #938385
    0
    Simon E
    nicmason wrote:
    Nasty article but its a fair point about towpaths.

    Let’s put this in perspective.

    How many people are there killed or injured on towpaths every year?

    How many people say they’d like to walk on towpaths more but daren’t do it because they are frightened by cyclists?

    <sarcasm> 

    If pedestrians find towpath cyclists intimidating then they should wear hi-viz, helmets and use bright LED lights so they are visible.

    </sarcasm>

    #938383
    0
    hawkinspeter
    nicmason wrote:
    Nasty article but its a fair point about towpaths. They are narrow and not designed for high speed cycling. The speed limit for a barge in the canal is 4 mph and imo that woud be a good speed limit for a cyclist on the towpath unless there are no pedestrians in sight.

    That’s a confused comparison.

    Firstly, I try not to cycle in a canal, but if I were to try that, I most likely wouldn’t be going as fast as 4mph.

    Secondly, whenever I’ve seen a barge on a towpath, it’s been travelling at exactly 0mph, so maybe barges should be treated differently to cycles.

    Thirdly, barges are big and heavy and take a while to stop, so 4mph seems reasonable. My  bike is small and light and can stop really quickly, so I’d suggest up to 10mph around pedestrians is more appropriate.

    #938381
    0
    Legs_Eleven_Worcester
    nicmason wrote:
    Nasty article but its a fair point about towpaths. They are narrow and not designed for high speed cycling. The speed limit for a barge in the canal is 4 mph and imo that woud be a good speed limit for a cyclist on the towpath unless there are no pedestrians in sight.

    I hear you about cyclists going hell for leather on towpaths, but .. 4 mph?   I consider myself an experienced and safe cyclist and don’t have any problems (that I know of!) with balance, but I’d struggle to cycle at 4 mph along a towpath. 

    #938379
    0
    nicmason

    Nasty article but its a fair

    Nasty article but its a fair point about towpaths. They are narrow and not designed for high speed cycling. The speed limit for a barge in the canal is 4 mph and imo that woud be a good speed limit for a cyclist on the towpath unless there are no pedestrians in sight.

    #938377
    0
    Master Bean

    Classic banter.
    Classic banter.

    #938375
    0
    Simon E

    Sorry, I refuse to click the

    Sorry, I refuse to click the link and given the nastiest newspaper in Britain the satisfaction and income. By providing a link you’re already improving their page ranking, thereby pushing them up the searches.

    TBH I’m happier not having that kind of shit in my life at all. Sometimes there’s stuff you are better for not knowing about and the Mail and the red top media is packed full of it.

    https://singletrackworld.com/no-daily-mail/

Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.