- This topic has 45 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 8 months ago by
davel.
-
CreatorTopic
-
October 2, 2018 at 9:58 pm #29013
gmac101
https://twitter.com/WMPRHRT/status/1046784923208753153
And cyclists are the major problem on the roads – imagine how quiet the roads would be if the police did this on any stretch of road on a regular basis
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
davel
Simon E wrote:Crashboy wrote:
Schools don’t “preach” anything nor what they”should” believe either religion or politics – trust me, they don’t have the time – and even faith schools are supposed to do exactly what you say (i.e teaching about religionS plural + teaching them what those concepts are rather than forcing a particular point of view down their throats. OFSTED doesn’t – quite rightly – allow that!)Using 1970’s phrases like “bible bashing” is not very helpful to the debate though…
The term “bible bashing” is used deliberately. Many of us grew up with people telling us what’s “right” and “truth” and what’s good for us (or more often what’s bad and that we’d go to hell etc) and only much later realising it was only an opinion, by which time much damage may have been done. And let’s not start on the cover-ups of corruption and paedophilia in such organisations.
Unless you’ve been involved in administration of many schools then you don’t know whether they “preach” about religion or politics. OFSTED inspectors are not there for the majority of the time so how would they know what is being done? And it’s not as if they creep into the back of the class in uniform and observe the teaching undetected.
If teachers are so busy teaching why do they have time to step outside of their remit and invent massively stupid rules like enforcing number plates and helmets for kids riding their bikes? (the majority of whom are invariably behaving normally)
Any religious organisation, either by implication or direct reference, can’t help but undermine the beliefs of other cultures and belief systems. And why are schools run on a religious basis in the first place? Why should a school be based on one set of ancient myths or another? Why can’t it exist simply for educating children?
Made me want to stand up and shout ‘Amen!’ more than any priest has!

FluffyKittenofTindalos
hawkinspeter wrote:For the sake of your kids’ education, you could just lie about being a lapsed member of the relevant faith (assuming they don’t require genital mutilation to be a member of that faith) and simply educate your kids about the nature of faith. The kids could then decide for themselves if they want to sit through the religious stuff or to make a stand against it.
Hmmm. Teaching your sprog early on about the importance of cycnicism and lies to getting on in life?
Plus, make sure they cycle there so as to learn how power is always abused, and they’ll have a firm grounding in how the world works.
Simon E
Crashboy wrote:
Crashboy wrote:
Schools don’t “preach” anything nor what they”should” believe either religion or politics – trust me, they don’t have the time – and even faith schools are supposed to do exactly what you say (i.e teaching about religionS plural + teaching them what those concepts are rather than forcing a particular point of view down their throats. OFSTED doesn’t – quite rightly – allow that!)Using 1970’s phrases like “bible bashing” is not very helpful to the debate though…
The term “bible bashing” is used deliberately. Many of us grew up with people telling us what’s “right” and “truth” and what’s good for us (or more often what’s bad and that we’d go to hell etc) and only much later realising it was only an opinion, by which time much damage may have been done. And let’s not start on the cover-ups of corruption and paedophilia in such organisations.
Unless you’ve been involved in administration of many schools then you don’t know whether they “preach” about religion or politics. OFSTED inspectors are not there for the majority of the time so how would they know what is being done? And it’s not as if they creep into the back of the class in uniform and observe the teaching undetected.
If teachers are so busy teaching why do they have time to step outside of their remit and invent massively stupid rules like enforcing number plates and helmets for kids riding their bikes? (the majority of whom are invariably behaving normally)
Any religious organisation, either by implication or direct reference, can’t help but undermine the beliefs of other cultures and belief systems. And why are schools run on a religious basis in the first place? Why should a school be based on one set of ancient myths or another? Why can’t it exist simply for educating children?
hawkinspeter
davel wrote:Having been through the Catholic school system, it just doesn’t work like that (at least not in my experience) It was actually a lot closer to compulsory Religious Education, with other religions only held up as ‘context’ to show how wrong they are. We had two (others had more) Society for the Protection of the Unborn Child videos sprung on us – just horrible anti-abortion propaganda. And then there’re all the clubs set up around confirmation time to shepherd you into The Club. I count in the Pope’s gang, even though I knew it was shit by the time I was 14.If an organisation has your kids’ ears for longer than you do, and wants to drip feed a message that you fundamentally don’t agree with, do you really want to spend the energy balancing it out and possibly creating conflict in your kids, as opposed to just send them to a school that doesn’t peddle that bullshit? I’ve actually no problem with my kids signing up to a religion, to a point, but I doubt they’re going to get a balanced view of any of them via a school of any religious flavour.
Yeah, it could be a difficult choice depending on just how much better the education is versus the amount of indoctrination.
I’d prefer schools to be focussed on the education aspect and not have any religious involvement (except for teaching about religions in religious studies etc), but history has left us with a bunch of good schools that happen to have been funded and run by different religions. I’d expect there to be a big variation in just how religion focussed they are but I expect it also depends on which religion they follow.
davel
Crashboy wrote:Simon E wrote:
Is it really a ‘high horse’ to have such a view? Can you not see why they may want to avoid a school that teaches/preaches stuff they fundamentally disagree with? Like asking a vegan that he/she has to work at a meat processing plant and say “It’s fine, you won’t touch the dead animals, just be dealing with paperwork, accounts, shift patterns and so on” but facilitating the thing they disagree with.vonhelmet wrote:
You could send them to the church school and just opt them out of collective worship, but I guess you wouldn’t be able to get on your high horse about it then.davel wrote:Schools being secular would help, too. We could practically throw our kids into a decent school from our garden… Problem is, they’d get a daily bible bashing, so we go past that to the nearest non-sky fairy one a mile away.There are lots of CofE primary schools in Shrewsbury, ours attended the one in our estate. Religion wasn’t at all heavy, the head cares far more about the SATS scores than bible-bashing in the school, to the extent that I consider it to be detrimental to the pupils’ development. 10 year olds don’t need hothousing and cramming. SATS are a distraction and not indicative of the quality or value of a child’s education.
I was brought up absolutely saturated in Christianity but I think schools should be agnostic and discuss religion as part of general Philosophy. Teach them to understand what religion, politics etc are, not what they should believe; but a lot of people don’t want them to think for themselves.
Schools don’t “preach” anything nor what they”should” believe either religion or politics – trust me, they don’t have the time – and even faith schools are supposed to do exactly what you say (i.e teaching about religionS plural + teaching them what those concepts are rather than forcing a particular point of view down their throats. OFSTED doesn’t – quite rightly – allow that!)
Using 1970’s phrases like “bible bashing” is not very helpful to the debate though…
There shouldn’t even be a debate. Schools should not be established around, or selecting via, religion.
Crashboy
Simon E wrote:
Is it really a ‘high horse’ to have such a view? Can you not see why they may want to avoid a school that teaches/preaches stuff they fundamentally disagree with? Like asking a vegan that he/she has to work at a meat processing plant and say “It’s fine, you won’t touch the dead animals, just be dealing with paperwork, accounts, shift patterns and so on” but facilitating the thing they disagree with.vonhelmet wrote:
You could send them to the church school and just opt them out of collective worship, but I guess you wouldn’t be able to get on your high horse about it then.davel wrote:Schools being secular would help, too. We could practically throw our kids into a decent school from our garden… Problem is, they’d get a daily bible bashing, so we go past that to the nearest non-sky fairy one a mile away.There are lots of CofE primary schools in Shrewsbury, ours attended the one in our estate. Religion wasn’t at all heavy, the head cares far more about the SATS scores than bible-bashing in the school, to the extent that I consider it to be detrimental to the pupils’ development. 10 year olds don’t need hothousing and cramming. SATS are a distraction and not indicative of the quality or value of a child’s education.
I was brought up absolutely saturated in Christianity but I think schools should be agnostic and discuss religion as part of general Philosophy. Teach them to understand what religion, politics etc are, not what they should believe; but a lot of people don’t want them to think for themselves.
Schools don’t “preach” anything nor what they”should” believe either religion or politics – trust me, they don’t have the time – and even faith schools are supposed to do exactly what you say (i.e teaching about religionS plural + teaching them what those concepts are rather than forcing a particular point of view down their throats. OFSTED doesn’t – quite rightly – allow that!)
Using 1970’s phrases like “bible bashing” is not very helpful to the debate though…
davel
vonhelmet wrote:
You could send them to the church school and just opt them out of collective worship, but I guess you wouldn’t be able to get on your high horse about it then.davel wrote:srchar wrote:KendalRed wrote:Now kids routinely go to schools that require long journeys, often passing by schools much closer to home. “Ooh, we’re over the moon, we managed to get our Tarquill into St Beckhams Academy – it’s a two hour drive, but the Ofsted was outstanding”Don’t be too harsh on parents – in some areas, schools are so oversubscribed that “choice” simply doesn’t exist – you go where you get sent, even if it’s an hour’s bus ride away. We’re planning to move out of London when ours hit school age, for this very reason.
Schools being secular would help, too. We could practically throw our kids into a decent school from our garden… Problem is, they’d get a daily bible bashing, so we go past that to the nearest non-sky fairy one a mile away.
Yeah, kids love being thrown into groups then immediately set apart as ‘different’. Do you have kids? Were you a kid? Are you an offended sky fairyist?
And you should remember – I’m no fan of horses.
davel
hawkinspeter wrote:FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:vonhelmet wrote:
You could send them to the church school and just opt them out of collective worship, but I guess you wouldn’t be able to get on your high horse about it then.davel wrote:srchar wrote:KendalRed wrote:Now kids routinely go to schools that require long journeys, often passing by schools much closer to home. “Ooh, we’re over the moon, we managed to get our Tarquill into St Beckhams Academy – it’s a two hour drive, but the Ofsted was outstanding”Don’t be too harsh on parents – in some areas, schools are so oversubscribed that “choice” simply doesn’t exist – you go where you get sent, even if it’s an hour’s bus ride away. We’re planning to move out of London when ours hit school age, for this very reason.
Schools being secular would help, too. We could practically throw our kids into a decent school from our garden… Problem is, they’d get a daily bible bashing, so we go past that to the nearest non-sky fairy one a mile away.
Don’t religious schools get to discriminate in favour of pupils of the right religious background, though? (And with teaching staff as well, come to that).
If you want to opt out of worship on the grounds of not having that religion, they could choose to put you to the back of the queue for admission.
Seems fair to complain about that. It seems blatantly wrong, to me.
Nicked from a NSS website:
We are non religious parents of a 3 year old child that will be attending primary school from September 2010. There are only four schools in the immediate catchment area and of these, three are faith schools who take pupils based on their religious beliefs or church membership. As this is our first child, we were unaware that we would be excluded from certain schools based on religion but feel strongly that religion should be kept separate from education.
All three of the faith schools have ‘outstanding’ Ofsted reports and because of this are always oversubscribed whilst the non-faith school offers a lower standard of education. We are only 100m from the nearest school, which happens to be a faith school, and as such we assumed that we would have a good chance of our daughter attending. However, this seems unlikely purely
because of our religious beliefsThat doesn’t sound particularly fair, but personally I don’t see it as too much of an issue and I’m a confirmed atheist.
For the sake of your kids’ education, you could just lie about being a lapsed member of the relevant faith (assuming they don’t require genital mutilation to be a member of that faith) and simply educate your kids about the nature of faith. The kids could then decide for themselves if they want to sit through the religious stuff or to make a stand against it.
Having been through the Catholic school system, it just doesn’t work like that (at least not in my experience) It was actually a lot closer to compulsory Religious Education, with other religions only held up as ‘context’ to show how wrong they are. We had two (others had more) Society for the Protection of the Unborn Child videos sprung on us – just horrible anti-abortion propaganda. And then there’re all the clubs set up around confirmation time to shepherd you into The Club. I count in the Pope’s gang, even though I knew it was shit by the time I was 14.
If an organisation has your kids’ ears for longer than you do, and wants to drip feed a message that you fundamentally don’t agree with, do you really want to spend the energy balancing it out and possibly creating conflict in your kids, as opposed to just send them to a school that doesn’t peddle that bullshit? I’ve actually no problem with my kids signing up to a religion, to a point, but I doubt they’re going to get a balanced view of any of them via a school of any religious flavour.
Simon E
Is it really a ‘high horse’ to have such a view? Can you not see why they may want to avoid a school that teaches/preaches stuff they fundamentally disagree with? Like asking a vegan that he/she has to work at a meat processing plant and say “It’s fine, you won’t touch the dead animals, just be dealing with paperwork, accounts, shift patterns and so on” but facilitating the thing they disagree with.vonhelmet wrote:
You could send them to the church school and just opt them out of collective worship, but I guess you wouldn’t be able to get on your high horse about it then.davel wrote:Schools being secular would help, too. We could practically throw our kids into a decent school from our garden… Problem is, they’d get a daily bible bashing, so we go past that to the nearest non-sky fairy one a mile away.There are lots of CofE primary schools in Shrewsbury, ours attended the one in our estate. Religion wasn’t at all heavy, the head cares far more about the SATS scores than bible-bashing in the school, to the extent that I consider it to be detrimental to the pupils’ development. 10 year olds don’t need hothousing and cramming. SATS are a distraction and not indicative of the quality or value of a child’s education.
I was brought up absolutely saturated in Christianity but I think schools should be agnostic and discuss religion as part of general Philosophy. Teach them to understand what religion, politics etc are, not what they should believe; but a lot of people don’t want them to think for themselves.
hawkinspeter
FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:vonhelmet wrote:
You could send them to the church school and just opt them out of collective worship, but I guess you wouldn’t be able to get on your high horse about it then.davel wrote:srchar wrote:KendalRed wrote:Now kids routinely go to schools that require long journeys, often passing by schools much closer to home. “Ooh, we’re over the moon, we managed to get our Tarquill into St Beckhams Academy – it’s a two hour drive, but the Ofsted was outstanding”Don’t be too harsh on parents – in some areas, schools are so oversubscribed that “choice” simply doesn’t exist – you go where you get sent, even if it’s an hour’s bus ride away. We’re planning to move out of London when ours hit school age, for this very reason.
Schools being secular would help, too. We could practically throw our kids into a decent school from our garden… Problem is, they’d get a daily bible bashing, so we go past that to the nearest non-sky fairy one a mile away.
Don’t religious schools get to discriminate in favour of pupils of the right religious background, though? (And with teaching staff as well, come to that).
If you want to opt out of worship on the grounds of not having that religion, they could choose to put you to the back of the queue for admission.
Seems fair to complain about that. It seems blatantly wrong, to me.
Nicked from a NSS website:
We are non religious parents of a 3 year old child that will be attending primary school from September 2010. There are only four schools in the immediate catchment area and of these, three are faith schools who take pupils based on their religious beliefs or church membership. As this is our first child, we were unaware that we would be excluded from certain schools based on religion but feel strongly that religion should be kept separate from education.
All three of the faith schools have ‘outstanding’ Ofsted reports and because of this are always oversubscribed whilst the non-faith school offers a lower standard of education. We are only 100m from the nearest school, which happens to be a faith school, and as such we assumed that we would have a good chance of our daughter attending. However, this seems unlikely purely
because of our religious beliefsThat doesn’t sound particularly fair, but personally I don’t see it as too much of an issue and I’m a confirmed atheist.
For the sake of your kids’ education, you could just lie about being a lapsed member of the relevant faith (assuming they don’t require genital mutilation to be a member of that faith) and simply educate your kids about the nature of faith. The kids could then decide for themselves if they want to sit through the religious stuff or to make a stand against it.
FluffyKittenofTindalos
vonhelmet wrote:
You could send them to the church school and just opt them out of collective worship, but I guess you wouldn’t be able to get on your high horse about it then.davel wrote:srchar wrote:KendalRed wrote:Now kids routinely go to schools that require long journeys, often passing by schools much closer to home. “Ooh, we’re over the moon, we managed to get our Tarquill into St Beckhams Academy – it’s a two hour drive, but the Ofsted was outstanding”Don’t be too harsh on parents – in some areas, schools are so oversubscribed that “choice” simply doesn’t exist – you go where you get sent, even if it’s an hour’s bus ride away. We’re planning to move out of London when ours hit school age, for this very reason.
Schools being secular would help, too. We could practically throw our kids into a decent school from our garden… Problem is, they’d get a daily bible bashing, so we go past that to the nearest non-sky fairy one a mile away.
Don’t religious schools get to discriminate in favour of pupils of the right religious background, though? (And with teaching staff as well, come to that).
If you want to opt out of worship on the grounds of not having that religion, they could choose to put you to the back of the queue for admission.
Seems fair to complain about that. It seems blatantly wrong, to me.
Nicked from a NSS website:
We are non religious parents of a 3 year old child that will be attending primary school from September 2010. There are only four schools in the immediate catchment area and of these, three are faith schools who take pupils based on their religious beliefs or church membership. As this is our first child, we were unaware that we would be excluded from certain schools based on religion but feel strongly that religion should be kept separate from education.
All three of the faith schools have ‘outstanding’ Ofsted reports and because of this are always oversubscribed whilst the non-faith school offers a lower standard of education. We are only 100m from the nearest school, which happens to be a faith school, and as such we assumed that we would have a good chance of our daughter attending. However, this seems unlikely purely
because of our religious beliefsvonhelmet
You could send them to the church school and just opt them out of collective worship, but I guess you wouldn’t be able to get on your high horse about it then.davel wrote:srchar wrote:KendalRed wrote:Now kids routinely go to schools that require long journeys, often passing by schools much closer to home. “Ooh, we’re over the moon, we managed to get our Tarquill into St Beckhams Academy – it’s a two hour drive, but the Ofsted was outstanding”Don’t be too harsh on parents – in some areas, schools are so oversubscribed that “choice” simply doesn’t exist – you go where you get sent, even if it’s an hour’s bus ride away. We’re planning to move out of London when ours hit school age, for this very reason.
Schools being secular would help, too. We could practically throw our kids into a decent school from our garden… Problem is, they’d get a daily bible bashing, so we go past that to the nearest non-sky fairy one a mile away.
armb
Shades wrote:What happened to good old fashioned random police checks?A friend of mine was told by local police (East Cambs) that if you see a traffic department police car on the road here, it’s on its way to or from a collision – they have absolutely no resources for anything else.
davel
srchar wrote:KendalRed wrote:Now kids routinely go to schools that require long journeys, often passing by schools much closer to home. “Ooh, we’re over the moon, we managed to get our Tarquill into St Beckhams Academy – it’s a two hour drive, but the Ofsted was outstanding”Don’t be too harsh on parents – in some areas, schools are so oversubscribed that “choice” simply doesn’t exist – you go where you get sent, even if it’s an hour’s bus ride away. We’re planning to move out of London when ours hit school age, for this very reason.
Schools being secular would help, too. We could practically throw our kids into a decent school from our garden… Problem is, they’d get a daily bible bashing, so we go past that to the nearest non-sky fairy one a mile away.
srchar
KendalRed wrote:Now kids routinely go to schools that require long journeys, often passing by schools much closer to home. “Ooh, we’re over the moon, we managed to get our Tarquill into St Beckhams Academy – it’s a two hour drive, but the Ofsted was outstanding”Don’t be too harsh on parents – in some areas, schools are so oversubscribed that “choice” simply doesn’t exist – you go where you get sent, even if it’s an hour’s bus ride away. We’re planning to move out of London when ours hit school age, for this very reason.
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.