log in
register

“Wanton and furious driving”

Viewing 10 replies - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • September 5, 2017 at 5:36 am #901509
    0
    antigee

    if the car has contaminated

    if the car has contaminated the carpet then it’ll probably have to be crushed:

    http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/crime/banned-motorist-who-damaged-crops-after-driving-onto-north-yorkshire-field-1-8731088

     

    September 4, 2017 at 6:53 pm #901507
    0
    Anonymous
    hawkinspeter wrote:
    There’s been a shocking development in this case – the people in the house are in possession of at least one pedal cycle.

    This doesn’t look good for them. The father has admitted that he was not looking at the road at the time of the incident and the house was not fitted with brakes, brake-lights or even a steering wheel. The prosecution is going to be looking at why the home-owners were unable to move out of the way of the car, and also why the house had NEVER passed an MOT.

    Some back-benchers are already calling for a change to the law to ensure that all houses within close proximity to a road, must be fitted with appropriate wheels so that the owners can avoid hitting cars.

    sounds like it’ll be an attempted murder case tbh, especially now new evidence plod have uncovered  that points the finger at the occupier who deliberately bought the property some 35 years ago as part of a terrorist cell designed to ensnare the unsuspecting, aggravated circumstances what with the bike in the shed as well, bastard deserves everything he gets. 

    September 4, 2017 at 3:41 pm #901505
    0
    Scoob_84

    If in doubt,  use the “it

    If in doubt,  use the “it came from nowhere” excuse

    September 4, 2017 at 2:40 pm #901503
    0
    hawkinspeter

    There’s been a shocking

    There’s been a shocking development in this case – the people in the house are in possession of at least one pedal cycle.

    This doesn’t look good for them. The father has admitted that he was not looking at the road at the time of the incident and the house was not fitted with brakes, brake-lights or even a steering wheel. The prosecution is going to be looking at why the home-owners were unable to move out of the way of the car, and also why the house had NEVER passed an MOT.

    Some back-benchers are already calling for a change to the law to ensure that all houses within close proximity to a road, must be fitted with appropriate wheels so that the owners can avoid hitting cars.

    September 4, 2017 at 12:18 pm #901501
    0
    Roberts Clubman

    Has the local Tory MP

    Has the local Tory MP pronounced that “Homeowners bring it on themselves” yet?

    September 4, 2017 at 12:02 pm #901499
    0
    Grahamd

    The ignorance of contributors

    The ignorance of contributors is alarming, it is the fault of the cyclist 3 streets away who 7 weeks ago failed to lock their bike after waving at the driver.

    September 4, 2017 at 11:53 am #901497
    0
    Bikebikebike

    Apparently the occupants of

    Apparently the occupants of the car all had head injuries.  Didn’t mention whether they were wearing helmets, though.  

    September 4, 2017 at 11:13 am #901495
    0
    hawkinspeter

    The latest news on this

    The latest news on this incident is that the house-owner is now being sued for having an unsafe wall and lack of suitable parking notices. Also, there is reasonable suspicion that the inhabitants may have been using mobile phones at the time of the incident.

    September 4, 2017 at 7:54 am #901493
    0
    hawkinspeter

    I just read some more about

    I just read some more about this. Apparently the police were first on the scene and have breathalysed the family in the house and have questioned them as to why they weren’t wearing helmets or hi-viz as it would have been virtually impossible for the car to have seen them.

    I think the Daily Wail is reporting it as “car hit by family as they watch X-Factor and pay no attention”.

    September 4, 2017 at 6:55 am #901491
    0
    hawkinspeter

    I think you’ll find that one

    I think you’ll find that one is a parking violation – you’re only allowed to stay parked for two hours there (and no return with 24 hours).

  • Author
    Replies
Viewing 10 replies - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.