log in
register

crank arm length

  • Creator
    Topic
  • March 27, 2015 at 8:39 pm #23609
    matthewtune6048

    There is thousands of arguments on crank arm length. But I’m after a simple answer. Im after changing my crank arm length. Can you change the crank arms alone or do you have to replace the full crank set with shorter arms? Cheers.

  • Creator
    Topic
Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
1 2
  • Author
    Replies
  • April 1, 2015 at 8:21 pm #839339
    0
    Welsh boy

    DavidC wrote:Somewhere in
    [quote=DavidC]Somewhere in this book (I read it years ago and so forget details) there is info that says (in a nutshell) that long crank arms are better.
    http://www.bikequarterly.com/books_bicycling_science.html%5B/quote%5D

    But just because it is some obscure book does that make it right?
    I would be very cautious of a book which covers topics such as how to calculate the optimum number of gears for a given rider which that one does.

    April 1, 2015 at 5:15 pm #839337
    0
    DavidC

    Somewhere in this book (I
    Somewhere in this book (I read it years ago and so forget details) there is info that says (in a nutshell) that long crank arms are better.
    http://www.bikequarterly.com/books_bicycling_science.html

    April 1, 2015 at 1:00 pm #839335
    0
    matthewtune6048

    thanks for all the input,
    thanks for all the input, sorted now. Found myself a cheap complete new crankset

    April 1, 2015 at 11:09 am #839333
    0
    shearer27

    What about your shoe stack
    What about your shoe stack height? Having a thicker sole would make your cranks shorter in effect wouldn’t it and vice-versa if your shoes had less then it would make your crank longer??

    March 31, 2015 at 4:49 pm #839331
    0
    rev

    I’m selling brand new 6800
    I’m selling brand new 6800 ultegra 172.5’s if you want just crank arms (no rings) you can use your existing rings. See classifieds for pics!

    Matt

    March 29, 2015 at 11:48 am #839329
    0
    Al'76

    175mm hurts my knees; 172.5mm
    175mm hurts my knees; 172.5mm doesn’t.

    March 29, 2015 at 3:10 am #839327
    0
    JonD

    It’s not unusual (cue burst
    It’s not unusual (cue burst of Tom Jones) for the cranks on recumbents/HPVs to be around the 150 mark, advantages seem to be reduced knee strain/pain and requiring/aiding a faster cadence. AFAIA there’s no great argument to say what the length should be, much like the knee-over-pedal-spindle myth, but the powercranks link is interesting. Train with them and you get used to them, allegedly. One proponent of short cranks is Mike Burrows , who can also shorten them for you if the crank allows it.

    I’m tempted to try ’em on the next recumbent, in 30-32 on one local 18%-er on a 36+lb ‘bent is bloody hard work winching yerself up when you can’t stand up for more leverage – dropping to a 26 inner with a short crank might make the difference if it can keep just enough cadence, with the downside of some loss of leverage.

    March 29, 2015 at 2:35 am #839325
    0
    chokofingrz

    I went from 170 to 175 and
    I went from 170 to 175 and noticed no difference at all. And going on the calculations, my teeny legs (length, not girth, haha) should be pedalling 165’s!

    March 28, 2015 at 9:30 pm #839323
    0
    matthewn5

    There’s some experimental
    There’s some experimental data that shows shorter cranks are better for power output… because we ‘should’ be spinning at a high cadence I guess. Here it is:

    https://www.powercranks.com/cld.html

    The research quoted there – about 3/4 of the way down the page – shows that cyclists produced the most power with quite short cranks. Very odd.

    Also if you have sore knees then go shorter, others say.

    I think the principle is, whatever works for you.

    I quite like shorter cranks as I used to hit the inner pedal on the ground when pedalling through corners. Your experience may be different.

    March 28, 2015 at 6:46 pm #839321
    0
    CanAmSteve

    Did I misread this? All the
    Did I misread this? All the “modern” groupsets I’ve built have a one-piece driveside crank/spider/BB axle. So while I suppose you could find a chainset minus the rings, it would be unlikely. And as mentioned, buying entire assemblies is almost always must more cost-effective than trying to find parts. (Example – best I could do for a Campy crown race was £16 + postage when I can order an entire headset for £40 with free shipping).

    The differences between a standard 170mm crank and the usual “large” 175mm are minimal. Sure, if you are a princess looking for a pea, you might notice. Sheldon had this to say

    “I think people really obsess too much about crank length. After all, we all use the same staircases, whether we have long or short legs. Short legged people acclimate their knees to a greater angle of flex to climb stairways, and can also handle proportionally longer cranks than taller people normally use.”

    http://sheldonbrown.com/cranks.html

    I have very long legs (saddle top to BB spindle 84cm) so I buy 175mm cranks and have one touring bike (with an MTB crankset) with 180mm cranks. Both are fine. But if you want the choice of “non-standard” lengths, you need to go to TA Carmina or Middleburn. Bring your bank manager and a data-mining specialist, because neither make it particularly easy to get a set of parts you can actually bolt onto your frame and ride.

    March 28, 2015 at 4:14 pm #839319
    0
    Anonymous

    matthewtune6048 wrote:Cheers.

    matthewtune6048 wrote:
    Cheers. Curently running shimano 105 compact 10 speed

    I’ll be pretty surprised if you can find a pair of 105 arms for a significantly lower price than a complete set. If I were in your shoes I would just take my time shopping for a good deal on the complete crankset (w/o BB) and then unload the old one on eBay. The old cranks will be easier to sell complete.

    March 28, 2015 at 4:10 pm #839317
    0
    Welsh boy

    steve8440 wrote:Caad 9 –

    steve8440 wrote:
    Caad 9 – 170mm Campy – saddle crown to pedal axle height is 78cm
    Super Six Evo 175 mm ultegra – 73cm
    Trek hack 172.5mm 105 – 75.5cm

    Can I tell any difference? Can I fuc……

    In which case I don’t think you should be posting advice on this topic.

    March 28, 2015 at 9:47 am #839315
    0
    steve8440

    Caad 9 – 170mm Campy – saddle
    Caad 9 – 170mm Campy – saddle crown to pedal axle height is 78cm
    Super Six Evo 175 mm ultegra – 73cm
    Trek hack 172.5mm 105 – 75.5cm

    Can I tell any difference? Can I fuc……

    March 28, 2015 at 7:34 am #839313
    0
    pants

    there is a rough guide on:
    there is a rough guide on:

    http://bikedynamics.co.uk/FitGuidecranks.htm

    March 28, 2015 at 7:32 am #839311
    0
    pants

    the longer your crank, the
    the longer your crank, the manlier you are, fact!

  • Author
    Replies
Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
1 2
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.