preferred-google-button
log in
register

Moral Dilemma – See Through Bottoms

  • Creator
    Topic
  • July 21, 2014 at 8:52 am #21953
    epcp20

    Almost on a daily basis I come across various ladies cycling through London with completely see-through leggings. They might not be see-through standing up, but hunched over a bike they often go completely transparent – with all that’s underneath on show.

    Now the question is – do I tell the owner of the transparent clothing that their undercrackers are on show? Or would that be deemed offensive/pervy?

    Are there any ladies here that could give a view? Would you like to be told?

  • Creator
    Topic
Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 36 total)
1 2 3
  • Author
    Replies
  • July 25, 2014 at 11:34 am #805003
    0
    Husain

    Its unfortunate that at the
    Its unfortunate that at the gym I go to, the spin bikes are setup up front. So running on the treadmills behind them gives you a choice to view a few TV channels or someone’s exposed behind.

    At some point, one of the gym’s staff would lean in and whisper into the ear of the cyclist embarrassing them enough to quit their workout. As a stranger to the cyclist, their no way of pointing the obvious without causing discouragement.

    Look the other way.

    July 25, 2014 at 10:16 am #805001
    0
    thesaladdays

    Being of the XY chromosome
    Being of the XY chromosome persuasion, I must admit to doing a quick, fortnightly ‘safety check’ in front of the mirror precisely to avoid offending my fellow road users!

    Don’t let it happen to you! :B

    July 24, 2014 at 4:44 pm #804999
    0
    Anonymous

    Look the rules are simple
    If
    Look the rules are simple

    If it’s a bloke it is perfectly acceptable to use the following polite phrase:
    “For f****s sake! Get some new lycra, no-one wants to see your rusty sheriffs badge; and while your at it learn to wipe your arse!”

    If it’s a girl, don’t be a dick! Either overtake if the view is not to your liking or relax and take in the scenery. DO NOT COMMENT on the transparency of her lycra, anything else but NOT the lycra.

    I once found myself behind a young lady who had the most exquisitely shaped perfect upside down heart bottom. Her lacy tanga briefs only helped to emphasise and frame the incredible beauty of her derriere.
    When I finally lost her at a set of traffic lights I was 10 miles further from my destination than when I first saw her.

    July 24, 2014 at 4:35 pm #804997
    0
    chunka

    White shorts, sweaty butt
    White shorts, sweaty butt crack, transparent through the rain, def see what he had for breakfast. Huge incentive to pass him asap.
    White shorts should be banned!
    Spotted first climb of this years etape.
    Meanwhile some tanned, tight thighs, prefer Italian if possible, sit and draft all day.
    Ps lower your jersey show a bit of clevage and wait for the push as you go by 😀
    That advice is only for the ladies!

    July 24, 2014 at 4:19 pm #804995
    0
    bashthebox

    Meh, could be
    Meh, could be worse.

    A strong look

    (spotted on tuesday evening)

    July 24, 2014 at 3:37 pm #804993
    0
    Joselito

    Through a mate’s son who was
    Through a mate’s son who was working for a Pro, I recently acquired some past season pro team kit as it doesn’t fit my mate’s son nor my mate.
    His kit is XS.
    The bibs are a distinctive colour in the peloton and even my small frame stretches the fabric so much that it loses its colour and becomes semi-transparent.
    It gives me that Rapha time trial skin suit look – not pleasant to look at all.

    July 24, 2014 at 10:31 am #804991
    0
    Anonymous

    To the bloke I had the
    To the bloke I had the misfortune of following for a short while last night on the approach to Shooters Hill. Your bib shorts are worn out, it’s horrific, please get a new pair.
    Ruck sack & purple tee shirt completes the outfit if that helps you identify yourself.

    July 23, 2014 at 1:23 pm #804989
    0
    farrell

    keirik wrote:Looking is

    keirik wrote:
    Looking is fine

    Not in my case it wasn’t.

    keirik wrote:
    get over yourselves
    You weren’t there man, you weren’t there…
    http://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/epic_142653_315813.gif

    July 23, 2014 at 12:58 pm #804987
    0
    keirik

    wow there are some rabid PC
    wow there are some rabid PC people on here today aren’t there!

    Looking is fine, staring isn’t, answering a comment on a forum is fine too

    get over yourselves

    July 23, 2014 at 8:51 am #804985
    0
    bashthebox

    Phew-eee, the stench of man
    Phew-eee, the stench of man musk runs strong. I’m fairly sure no one would ever think badly of another human having their eye turned by an another attractive human, but writing loudly on a forum about ogling the laydeez in their knickers kind of reeks of some 1970s working mens club. So maybe just think it, don’t write it.

    As for the OP’s question, I think the dilemma is to whether the person would like to know if their knickers are on show. Unfortunately, asking the cyclist would only cause embarrassment, so I reckon addressing the issue is best left to their friends or family.

    July 22, 2014 at 10:45 pm #804983
    0
    daddyELVIS

    glynr36 wrote:I do? I think

    glynr36 wrote:
    I do? I think you need to look at the way you view women.

    You deffo need a chill pill. My comment was quite flippant on purpose – to highlight how ridiculous this thread is.

    I’m quite comfortable with my view on women, as are my wife, daughter, and work colleagues.

    There’s nothing wrong with having a bit of a joke, especially when the conversation is a bit daft – as I said, chill a little.

    BTW – I only draft nice female cyclists on climbs – the slower pace allows more time to enjoy the view :))

    July 22, 2014 at 7:33 pm #804981
    0
    userfriendly

    glynr36 wrote:
    The same

    glynr36 wrote:

    The same stands for that as well.

    You’re overshooting the target a wee bit here.

    If you’re making someone uncomfortable with your attention, then yes, that is overstepping your boundaries and morally more than questionable. But simply enjoying seeing another fit human is not the same thing.

    We’re sexual beings, there is nothing wrong with that, and a fit human body is pleasant to look at for a variety of obvious reasons. Don’t be a prude.

    glynr36 wrote:

    I think you’d find this situation is definetly perving.

    If he goes out of his way to stay / draft behind that woman just to stare at her bum, aye. That’s perving. But that’s not what I meant, and I don’t think that’s what daddyELVIS meant either, or the OP for that matter.

    July 22, 2014 at 6:45 pm #804979
    0
    glynr36

    The same stands for that as
    The same stands for that as well.

    I think you’d find this situation is definetly perving.

    July 22, 2014 at 6:32 pm #804977
    0
    userfriendly

    glynr36 wrote:
    I do? I think

    glynr36 wrote:

    I do? I think you need to look at the way you view women.

    And how many straight women or gay men do you know that don’t like looking at a fit bloke?

    I don’t see much wrong with “enjoying the view”, it’s when it gets into perving / harrassing territory where I would draw the line.

    July 22, 2014 at 4:27 pm #804975
    0
    glynr36

    I do? I think you need to
    I do? I think you need to look at the way you view women.

  • Author
    Replies
Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 36 total)
1 2 3
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.