At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Would love one, but especially on our rural roads wouldn't feel safe being that low and below the line of sight of motorists in the tall grass...
Yes you can just see the give way sign and markings in the photo - personally at that distance from the junction I would be riding primary to make...
Unicycle riders are capable of going more than 20mph, but you'd be wanting a big wheel for that (a 24inch wheel isn't likely to cut it)....
That's a ridiculous argument, you might as well say the rider is to blame because if he had got out of bed fifteen minutes later their paths would...
It makes sense to me. If, say 50% of people will jump a red light whether cycling or driving, and at a particular set of lights, there's 10 cars...
Let's face it, he'd still be leading the Giro right now if he was riding an aluminium frame with mid-spec components priced under two grand.
I had the same thought when I saw those numbers. The absolute amounts are just as important as the relative amounts, and these profits are...
Totally this. Go back 100-120 years and say "you know old chap the time will come when everyone has got one of these infernal cars" and perhaps...
Isn't that what Chump says in court?
More likely they're just responding to a very skewed version of the incident presented to them by Royal Parks at face value.