At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Good luck to them (I don't imagine that even half of what they're proposing now will actually be implemented, but it'll be interesting to hear the...
I wonder if that nice Mr Mark Harper, secretary of state for transport, would like to have a discussion/poll about whether cyclists think these...
If they'd appealed her sentence and decided she'd been punished enough I'd have been OK with it. Unfortunately, this judgement implies she wasn't...
Yeah, doesn't look much better on the model photographed on Kostume's website either...
Avoided speeding cyclist
I would prefer we stop "paying lip service to cycling infrastructure" and ... actually build proper cycling infrastructure (best guidelines in UK...
Safety first - eat the telly!
OK, my misunderstanding then.
I was knocked off in very similar circumstances. There was absolutely no contesting the claim and I was paid out very quickly. We should ignore any...
I think it's the stereotype of who votes Tory. Once you get out into the countryside south of the A369 heading out toward Nailsea, Tickenham, etc,...