At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Come on Adwitiya. Do better....
If you get one on C2W, be sure to regularly ride it past the Telegraph offices.
Sorry to read that, hope you're back out again soon! Sounds like you're an experienced rider and it was one of those things....
I am not as confident as you on this one. At best ... I hope it would not be counter-productive....
My understanding of speed in relation dangerous driving charges is that to be considered dangerous, the speed needs to be knowingly and objectively...
Sorry, total reading failure! Other thoughts stand though - every brand is charging you for the box one way or another.
On a different note I've been wondering why my reports are taking longer for them to process recently...
Looks like a good approach to me....
So sad,its one of my local shops, literally cycle past it nearly every day....
He needs to tell his friends and relations to stop using Signal, anyway… Or at the very least to RTFM.