Home
British Cycling president takes part in Twitter Q&A and responds to claims he ignored Paul Kimmage

Brian Cookson told Lance Armstrong yesterday that he would back a truth and reconciliation process to examine doping within cycling, but his priority if elected as UCI president would be to investigate the governing body’s role in alleged cover-ups relating to the disgraced cyclist. Cookson has also responded to criticism regarding claims he ignored questions from journalist Paul Kimmage.

The British Cycling president, who is standing against Pat McQuaid for election as president of the UCI, was responding to a tweet from Armstrong during a question and answer session on Twitter, in which Kimmage also put a series of questions to Cookson. Today, Cookson has clarified his position in relation to those points raised.

Armstrong, who indicated earlier this year that he would be prepared to take part in such a process after talks with the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) broke down, tweeted: “Question for ‪@cooksonforuci - any plans to convene a Truth and Rec Commission to FULLY understand the mistakes of previous generations?”

Cookson referred Armstrong to a reply to an earlier question from Twitter user @CrisTT, who had asked him: “What is your stance on need & timescales for a Truth and Reconciliation approach?”

In reply, Cookson said: “I would prioritise the allegations which implicate the UCI in cover-ups. Must be investigated independently and quickly.”

His tweet to Armstrong read: “See my reply to @CrisTT Also would support a full truth and rec process if legal and practical hurdles can be overcome."

In January this year, disbanding the independent commission it had itself set up to examine its role in the US Postal scandal, the UCI said it instead planned to establish a truth and reconciliation commission.

However, no progress has been made in setting one up, due to issues such as how it would work in practice, who would fund it, and the UCI arguing with the World Anti Doping Agency that the remit of such a body should extend to sports beyond cycling.

While Armstrong has indicated his willingness to participate in any process, there is scepticism among many that he would make a full disclosure of the extent of the doping that last year led to him being banned from sport for life and stripped of results including the seven Tour de France titles he won from 1999 to 2005.

In his televised confession to Oprah Winfrey in January, he admitted having cheated his way to those victories, but rejected USADA’s finding that he also doped after his return to the sport in 2009.

His insistence he did not dope after his comeback is widely believed to be due to legal reasons, since potential actions from sponsors and others from that period would not currently be subject to a statute of limitations.

Cookson also responded to questions on subjects as diverse as women’s cycling, which he said the UCI needs to take “much more seriously,” and whether the UCI should be promoting its own races, such as the Tour of Beijing, to which he said: “We need to work to develop races around the world, but with existing and new organisers. Not in competition with them.”

Those and other issues will no doubt be dealt with in his election manifesto, which is due to be unveiled in Paris on Monday afternoon.

In the meantime, there is no news as yet of any decision from an arbitration tribunal that is considering a challenge to Swiss Cycling’s nomination of McQuaid to run for a third term.

With Cycling Ireland rejecting backing his nomination last weekend, the nomination from the national federation of Switzerland, where McQuaid is resident and the UCI is based, is his only hope of being able to stand in September’s election.

In a post on his blog today, Cookson, who is a member of the UCI management committee, responded to critcicism that he had apparently ignored questions from Kimmage yesterday during that Q&A on Twitter.

The Irish journalist, being sued for defamation by McQuaid, his predecessor as UCI President (and current Honorary President) Hein Verbruggen and the UCI itself, an action suspended late last year - Kimmage himself has countersued - asked Cookson:

@cooksonforuci There were three plaintiffs (PMCQ, HB and UCI) on the legal suit I was served: Were you party to this decision?

@cooksonforuci I'll try again...Were you party to the decision to sue Floyd Landis? Is suing whistleblowers in your manifesto?

@cooksonforuci @moran_anto As an example of openess and transparency would you mind answering my questions please? #askbrian

Cookson, who did not respond to those questions on Twitter yesterday, clarified his position today, saying that he was unable to reply to the specific points put to him by Kimmage because of the ongoing legal action.

"Paul is one of many journalists who deserve respect for the work they have put into exposing doping in cycling," he wrote.

"Regrettably, I cannot answer his concerns directly because they involve legal actions which are still live. However, I commit now to answering them in full as soon as I am able.

"What I can say as a general point, is that the UCI has expended too much time, resource and money fighting battles which have distracted it from far bigger problems – in particular doping.

"I can also say that if I am elected in September, the UCI will not use the courts to silence whistle-blowers, journalists or other dissenting voices. This is not to say we would not seek to communicate our own point of view or correct inaccuracies or unbalanced comment when appropriate but I am a firm believer in freedom of debate as being good for the long-term health of any sport."

Born in Scotland, Simon moved to London aged seven and now lives in the Oxfordshire Cotswolds with his miniature schnauzer, Elodie. He fell in love with cycling one Saturday morning in 1994 while living in Italy when Milan-San Remo went past his front door. A daily cycle commuter in London back before riding to work started to boom, he's been news editor at road.cc since 2009. Handily for work, he speaks French and Italian. He doesn't get to ride his Colnago as often as he'd like, and freely admits he's much more adept at cooking than fettling with bikes.

5 comments

Avatar
Decster [246 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes

Well done Cookson for ignoring Paul Kimmage's questions put to him last night.

That in my opinion taints Cookson.

Avatar
Sam1 [220 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes

The Kimmage suirs - the UCI one AND the Kimmage one - are both wrapped up in legal. If Cookson had responded to Kimmage's question, he would have been deemed as responding as the UCI - not as Brian Cookson, the individual. He would have been mad to have replied, and is almost certainly under instructions together with the rest of the UCI Management Committee to not respond personally to any questions put to them about either lawsuit while both are still open.

Sorry if this is a mundane POV, but having something of a legal background, I'm pretty sure I'm right in saying that he did the right thing yesterday, however much some people have got arsey about it.

Avatar
farrell [1950 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes
Decster wrote:

Well done Cookson for ignoring Paul Kimmage's questions put to him last night.

That in my opinion taints Cookson.

Perhaps his response here will placate you:

http://briancookson.org/en/blog/

Brian Cookson wrote:

21/6/13
Respecting Social Media
I wanted to do a quick update after yesterday's Twitter Q&A which was something I was really keen to do. Although the UCI presidency is decided by 42 delegates, I strongly believe that cycling has to do more to connect with fans, and this was a small step in that direction.

The questions varied widely and I tried to address a spectrum of issues from across the sport. Some of the questions were serious, some not-so-serious. Some of the questions were extremely difficult to answer in 140 characters – one of the perils of Twitter!

In particular, many of you were keen that I answered questions from Paul Kimmage and I wanted to address those here today.

Paul Kimmage's questions (in order) were:

@cooksonforuci There were three plaintiffs (PMCQ, HB and UCI) on the legal suit I was served: Were you party to this decision?
@cooksonforuci I'll try again...Were you party to the decision to sue Floyd Landis? Is suing whistleblowers in your manifesto?
@cooksonforuci @moran_anto As an example of openess and transparency would you mind answering my questions please? #askbrian

Paul is one of many journalists who deserve respect for the work they have put into exposing doping in cycling. Regrettably, I cannot answer his concerns directly because they involve legal actions which are still live. However, I commit now to answering them in full as soon as I am able.

What I can say as a general point, is that the UCI has expended too much time, resource and money fighting battles which have distracted it from far bigger problems – in particular doping.

I can also say that if I am elected in September, the UCI will not use the courts to silence whistle-blowers, journalists or other dissenting voices. This is not to say we would not seek to communicate our own point of view or correct inaccuracies or unbalanced comment when appropriate but I am a firm believer in freedom of debate as being good for the long-term health of any sport.

I'm looking forward to launching my manifesto in Paris next week. No doubt, there will be plenty of discussion around the issues raised but I look forward to hearing your views – good and bad!

Avatar
skippy [408 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes

Whilst the Q n A was a brave attempt to communicate with the Cycling Community , it was a HUGE Misstep , since the ONLY people that count are the 42 Voting Delegates !

In skippyblogging.blogspot , i have picked up a bunch of questions asked , as well as some replies . Many questions were posed after time had run out , but in my email , this morning , i suggested that he should rectify this situation . Would be far better for him to join with a Live blogger such as @Inrng or @cyclingtips so that the questions could be visible and taken in a semblence of transparent order .

Can anyone imagine phat the rat attempting uncontrolled dialoge with the Cycling Community , no way , even his brother has disowned him , with the declaration that he should never have taken on this job !

Avatar
kie7077 [877 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes

"What I can say as a general point, is that the UCI has expended too much time, resource and money fighting battles which have distracted it from far bigger problems – in particular doping.

So, does this means he still regards whistle-blowers as a problem?