Home
Coach Bettini looks to the future, with new rules excluding riders with doping history

Paolo Bettini, manager of the Italian national team, has selected a predominantly young squad to contest the London-Surrey Cycle Classic, to be held later this month over the same course that will be used for the Olympic road race in 12 months’ time, reports La Gazzetta dello Sport.

The team for the race on Sunday August 14 includes three riders who won stages in this year’s Giro d’Italia, the 25-year-old Eros Capecchi of Liquigas-Cannondale, Oscar Gatto, aged 26 of Farnese Vini-Neri Sottoli, and Diego Ulissi, aged 22, from Lampre-ISD.

They are joined by Colnago-CSF rider Sacha Modolo, aged 24, who finished fourth in Milan-San Remo in 2010 and, the most experienced member of the squad, the 34-year-old Luca Paolini of Katusha, who was third in both Milan-San Remo in 2006 and the Tour of Flanders the following year.

"It’s without doubt a team that looks to the future, created from the wealth of young Italian talent with the addition of Luca Paolini, a man of great experience who took part in the Olympic adventure and the success we achieved in Athens, and who is therefore able to interpret to the best an Olympic road race,” explained Bettini, who himself won the gold medal in that race in Greece in 2004.

The pool of riders from whom Bettini was able to make his selection was reduced earlier this year when the Italian authorities introduced a new rule barring anyone who had served a doping ban of six months or more from wearing the national colours.

 

Born in Scotland, Simon moved to London aged seven and now lives in the Oxfordshire Cotswolds with his miniature schnauzer, Elodie. He fell in love with cycling one Saturday morning in 1994 while living in Italy when Milan-San Remo went past his front door. A daily cycle commuter in London back before riding to work started to boom, he's been news editor at road.cc since 2009. Handily for work, he speaks French and Italian. He doesn't get to ride his Colnago as often as he'd like, and freely admits he's much more adept at cooking than fettling with bikes.

4 comments

Avatar
arrieredupeleton [574 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Would Cunego have been included has yesterday's revelations not surfaced? The new restrictions place Bettini in a difficult predicament. Cant see the Spanish authorities operating a similar policy somehow.

Avatar
Matt_S [234 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
arrieredupeleton wrote:

Would Cunego have been included has yesterday's revelations not surfaced? The new restrictions place Bettini in a difficult predicament. Cant see the Spanish authorities operating a similar policy somehow.

No, the Spanish are aiming to be the first to field a team entirely made up of riders who've been cleared of all doping charges despite the evidence against them.

Avatar
pward [88 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

All power to the Italians for that 6 month rule  41 , effectively barring offenders from competing for World's honours, while allowing themselves some wiggle room for "technical" offences (false positives / unwitting positives*) which I suspect will become more and more frequent as the rules, technology and intolerance of doping ramp upwards in order to retain the interest of sponsors.

* I know you are wholly responsible for what you do/take/eat etc, but as I see it there exist many ways of potentially introducing a banned substance to a competitor during competition - who remembers seeing Thomas Voeckler taking bottles offered from the roadside, riders in a break sharing a drink when the team cars cannot get through. In these days of literally forensic levels of analysis, it isn't beyond reason to expect dark deeds to appeal to some desperate teams / riders in an attempt to debar a competitor. As such, it will probably become a default line of defence from offenders too, so as ever the tricky bit will be teasing the deliberate cheats from the unwitting/gullible ones  39

Avatar
antonio [1103 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

unwitting/gullible ones ? these guys are pros, are they really that naive?