Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Gilligan "almost certain" Khan won't triple cycle routes in three years

Former London Cycling Commissioner says delays to construction will make it hard for Khan to triple protected cycle routes during this term

London’s former cycling commissioner, Andrew Gilligan, says he is “almost certain” Sadiq Khan and his cycling team won’t achieve their goal to treble protected cycle routes in London over the next three years.

Among London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s cycling-related election pledges were a tripling the 12 miles of protected cycle routes constructed under former Mayor, Boris Johnson’s term, as well as more Quietways and “Liveable Neighbourhoods”.

Gilligan, who left the post of Johnson's Cycling Commissioner in May 2016, believes the length of time it is taking to agree on designs, and begin construction, makes achievement of the target unlikely within a single Mayoral term.

However, London’s Deputy Mayor for Transport, Val Shawcross, told road.cc earlier in December the aim of greater consultation is to end the “bikelash” which has hampered construction of London cycle routes in the past, and says that, and more efficient processes within Transport for London (TfL) will make building new cycle routes easier.

Speaking to road.cc prior to Sadiq Khan’s announcement he’d delay a decision over closure of Regent’s Park gates at rush hour to reduce rat running traffic as part of Cycle Superhighway 11 (CS11), Gilligan pointed out it took just over three years to build around 12 miles of cycle routes, and Khan has about the same time to triple that.

“I’m almost certain that a plan to treble the cycle lanes will not be achieved,” Gilligan told road.cc.

He pointed to construction of London’s East-West cycle superhighway, which was originally consulted on in 2014. It took just over three months to analyse and publish consultation results, before Johnson announced a decision to proceed in January 2015; construction started in March, and the route opened in May 2016.

Sadiq Khan "to double" amount spent on cycling in London

Gilligan said: “On a much less complicated scheme, the North-South Cycle Superhighway extension, they announced a decision to proceed in August or September, but it’s not going to start building until next summer.”

He has also been critical of the delayed decision over whether to close gates to Regent's Park to rat-running traffic as part of CS11, and the apparent shortening of CS4 and CS9, as well as the fact Khan didn't appoint his Cycling and Walking Commissioner, Will Norman, until December. Norman won't step into the role until February 2017, a delay which Gilligan has said plays into opponents' hands.

Mayor appoints Nike executive as London’s first full-time cycling commissioner

“The momentum has completely disappeared, the air has gone out of the tyres. It’s completely failed, all sorts of things that should have been finished by now haven’t even started,” he said.

“I just think it’s pretty obvious that cycling isn’t a priority. The grand announcements are fine but they mean nothing unless he brings forward the projects and spends the money."

Gilligan, a journalist who now works for the Sunday Times, has expressed concerns over delays to construction of the East-West Cycle Superhighway through Hyde Park, and past Buckingham Palace, which were due to be completed by now, but are either under construction or, in the case of the section past Buckingham Palace, aren’t started yet. 

Said Gilligan: “It’s depressing, it feels like we’re going backwards. I suppose it’s still possible he could be a good mayor for cycling but we have seen no sign of that. What matters is deeds not words.”

London's new cycle highways will be better than before

Deputy Mayor, Val Shawcross, told road.cc at the announcement of a doubling of spending on cycling earlier this month greater consultation will re-frame cycling investment as about healthy streets, and reduce resistance to road changes.

“I think one of the things we’ve learned is that you do need to try and break down this us and them approach,” Shawcross said. “This is not about cyclists versus the rest of the world, so our policy has been a bit reframed and it is about healthy streets, i.e. how can we improve the streets for everybody.”

“I think we’ve learned that you need to do consultation early on, if you just slap it on the table and say 'this is what we’re going to do to you', people understandably react.”

“We can’t carry on like that,” she said. “We’ve got to make it an agenda that everybody can see what’s in it for them.”

“The mayor’s committed to making London a good place to cycle and walk and we’re fulfilling the manifesto.”

She said the doubling of spending on cycling was the Mayor “putting his money where his mouth is”.

The London Cycling Campaign’s Infrastructure Campaigner, Simon Munk, believes the target is “totally achievable” based on the previous administration’s record, as the East-West and North-South Cycle Superhighways were only built in the last two years of Boris Johnson’s Mayoralty.

He believes greater public engagement is a positive step to reducing “bikelash”.

“The issues that have dogged cycling thus far in London has been this horrific bikelash, where we see the Mini Hollands and Cycle Superhighways attacked again and again. If we can get more people on side and more people to understand early on what the impacts are; we have two three arguably high quality cycle superhighways in, I think we’re at least at the point where we can point at those, and in fact we’ve got Mini Hollands … we can say: ‘You know what? This is what the future looks like, you can see it in London now, it’s not an unknown quantity any more’.”

“So I think they’re utterly capable of doing it in the time allocated, and I think the budget they’ve set indicates how serious they are about fulfilling their pledges and about cycling and walking, and healthy streets for that matter as well.”

 

 

Add new comment

7 comments

Avatar
severs1966 | 7 years ago
0 likes

Politician promises something, in order to get elected.

Promise turns out to be not true.

Given that all politicians do this at every election, it's not really news is it?

Khan doesn't give a shit whether people on bikes live or die; he cares about whether he gets elected. He is "delaying decisions" on schemes (i.e. abandoning them) because of the anti-cycle-path rhetoric in the press; he fears doing anything pro-cycling in case it hurts his chances of remaining in power.

Avatar
ktache | 7 years ago
1 like

I'm shocked that's it only 12 miles.  And, if the LTDA are to be believed, has brought traffic in London to a standstill.  I hate to think what another 36 miles could do.

Avatar
emishi55 | 7 years ago
1 like

"We do not need cycle tracks on 100% of roads to obtain 100% segragation":

http://www.aviewfromthecyclepath.com/2012/04/100-segregation-of-bikes-an.

(from the 2012 Hembrow article)

These days, very many roads and streets are not part of the route network for cars. They still allow access by car, so that people who live along them may reach their own homes, for instance, but they are not through routes by car. As a result, such streets are absolutely not dominated by cars. A cyclist using a road on such a route has much the same feelings about safety as someone using a cycle-path.

 

This I agree is the fastest way of achieving a neywork of routes.

But RDRF is not arguiing for 100% segregation - just the increase required where direct, safe routes are desirable on main roads that are unlikely to fit the bill for 'low-car / no-car treatment' 

 

But the  crux has to be for roads that are not part of the main trunk network -

ACCESS ONLY (for motors)

 

 

 

Avatar
ChairRDRF | 7 years ago
5 likes

Don't forget we have 0.15% of roads with segregated cycle tracks. Tripling will mean 0.45% of roads.

We also need support for cycling with things like fair law enforcement on the 99+% of roads we are on, plus secure and convenenient home parking, plus safer lorries.

 

Avatar
enas replied to ChairRDRF | 7 years ago
0 likes
ChairRDRF wrote:

Don't forget we have 0.15% of roads with segregated cycle tracks. Tripling will mean 0.45% of roads.

We do not need cycle tracks on 100% of roads to obtain 100% segragation:

http://www.cycling-embassy.org.uk/faq/...

http://www.aviewfromthecyclepath.com/2012/04/100-segregation-of-bikes-an...

ChairRDRF wrote:

We also need support for cycling with things like fair law enforcement on the 99+% of roads we are on, plus secure and convenenient home parking, plus safer lorries.

Unfortunately, none of that has ever been shown to work:

http://cyclingfallacies.com/en/16/higher-standards-of-driving-would-make...

http://cyclingfallacies.com/en/17/everyone-needs-to-share-the-road

Avatar
davel replied to enas | 7 years ago
0 likes
enas wrote:
ChairRDRF wrote:

We also need support for cycling with things like fair law enforcement on the 99+% of roads we are on, plus secure and convenenient home parking, plus safer lorries.

Unfortunately, none of that has ever been shown to work:

http://cyclingfallacies.com/en/16/higher-standards-of-driving-would-make...

http://cyclingfallacies.com/en/17/everyone-needs-to-share-the-road

Unfortunately, neither of those links specifically dealt with the points made ie. enforcement, parking and safe HGVs.

All valid points about segregation, and it needs to form a large part of the argument and campaign.

However, even if we can achieve something of a Dutch model in the UK, it will take an age to get there, leaving the current generations of cyclists sharing roads with motors. So in the short-mid term (and, in the likely event that we can't implement a national segregated network [IMO], longer term too), motons need to learn to play nicer on the roads, or chunks of road that are more appropriately cycled and walked on need to be steered away from through motorised traffic.

Call that naivete if you like, but we haven't even tried proper campaigns yet - not in my lifetime anyway (eg. an equivalent 'think bike' campaign for cycles). I don't see the evidence for 'these campaigns don't work' because a properly targeted one regarding cyclists on modern roads hasn't been tried.

Avatar
enas replied to davel | 7 years ago
0 likes
davel wrote:

 Unfortunately, neither of those links specifically dealt with the points made ie. enforcement, parking and safe HGVs.

The pages cover tangential although related questions, but many of the provided links are directly relevant. 

davel wrote:

All valid points about segregation, and it needs to form a large part of the argument and campaign. However, even if we can achieve something of a Dutch model in the UK, it will take an age to get there, leaving the current generations of cyclists sharing roads with motors.

The "we are too far behind" issue has also been extensively covered by David Hembrow: http://www.aviewfromthecyclepath.com/search/label/we%20are%20n%20years%2... Basically, it doesn't take too long to get tangible results, and in fact, in eight years there were already good results.

davel wrote:

 Call that naivete if you like, but we haven't even tried proper campaigns yet - not in my lifetime anyway (eg. an equivalent 'think bike' campaign for cycles). I don't see the evidence for 'these campaigns don't work' because a properly targeted one regarding cyclists on modern roads hasn't been tried.

First, there has been campaigns of this kind, in the UK and other countries too, and links are provided on the cyclingfallacies.com pages I was linking to. But looking at the more general issue, it's been very well documented how such campaigns achieve little in modifying road users behaviour. Think of drink-driving, speeding, illegal parking, none of those issues have every been successfully addressed, in the UK or elsewhere, by such campaigns.

Latest Comments