Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

They can't all be cyclists can they? Almost HALF of modern men admit to shaving their legs

We explore the trend - and whether it was cyclists who set it...

Maybe cyclists (and swimmers) were doing it first, but new research suggests that up to half of modern men are shaving their legs.

In a survey of Men’s Health Facebook readers, 33.1 per cent of respondents said they occasionally used a trimmer to keep things neat, and and additional 15.3 per cent said they shaved their legs ‘frequently’.

Sister title Women’s Health asked its readership whether it was partial to a close shave, and the results were equally revealing: 30 per cent liked a bit of a trim, while 22 per cent said they liked a clean-shaven look.

Male image consultant Aaron Marino, based in Atlanta, USA, told the magazine: “Most guys are not interested in completely shaving their legs, but they will take the length and bulk down with a groomer attachment. Just so the leg hair isn’t crazy, bushy and long.

“It becomes kind of a hair-management situation.

"For me, it’s purely aesthetic. When I started working out, I shaved my arms so you could see more definition. In the fitness world, it’s not as taboo for men to remove body hair.

So I kept doing it, and then started shaving my legs, too. I prefer the look, and I feel like it’s cleaner. Hair isn’t one of those things I need.”

Another theory posited by the magazine was that a trend for tattoos on the legs led men to shave, to show off their ink.

Back in 2014 we reported how science has given you a solid reason to depilate.

Up till recently it's been considered that the least plausible reason for shaving was to improve aerodynamics. Sure, shave because it looks good, it's easier to get a massage, bandages and tape are easier if you crash, it feels nice in bed and the opposite sex digs it.

Shave for aerodynamics though? Not so much. Everyone references a study done by Chester Kyle for Bicycling magazine back in 1987. That test found only a tiny difference in aerodynamic drag, 0.6 percent.

That's a few seconds over 25 miles at a typical decent time-trail speed. If you're not chasing personal bests up and down the country, it's arguably not worth the hassle.

Early in July, though, Specialized aerodynamicists Mark Cote and Chris Yu blew conventional thinking out of the water. They found savings of 50 to 80 seconds over 40km when they tested riders in their wind tunnel before and after shaving their legs.

Cote says: "We've run about 1200 hours' worth of experiments [in the wind tunnel] over the last year and no question, this shaved leg data set has been the most surprising revelation."

Yu adds that he and Cote had wanted to test the effect of shaving legs for a long time, "but just didn't believe it would be a big enough difference to be able to measure it."

Add new comment

10 comments

Avatar
Fish_n_Chips | 7 years ago
0 likes

My legs are the missing link. yes

I would shave them if I was a pro cyclist lol. 

 

 

Avatar
jollygoodvelo | 7 years ago
0 likes

My legs and face are both unshorn.  I can't afford the FCN points.

 

http://www.itsnotarace.org/fcn-calculator/

 

Avatar
MikeOnABike | 7 years ago
1 like

I'm as hairy as Chewbacca. Stuff that.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn | 7 years ago
1 like

I suspect that where it says "33.1 per cent of respondents said they occasionally used a trimmer to keep things neat", the respondents weren't talking about their legs exactly.

(but I'm can't be arsed to go to the source of the "research")

Avatar
Jimnm replied to Dnnnnnn | 7 years ago
1 like

Duncann wrote:

I suspect that where it says "33.1 per cent of respondents said they occasionally used a trimmer to keep things neat", the respondents weren't talking about their legs exactly.

(but I'm can't be arsed to go to the source of the "research")

Statistics probably incorporate shaving/waxing back, sack n crack lol  3

Avatar
gsavill90 (not verified) | 7 years ago
0 likes

Weirdos.

Avatar
Jimnm | 7 years ago
1 like

I'm pretty sure that the majority of male cyclists don't shave their legs. The so called 'modern man' can't be arsed to shave their face  let alone their legs.  If you are a racer then that's up to you wether you shave your legs or not.   3

Avatar
tritecommentbot | 7 years ago
5 likes

To be clear. It's a survey of image conscious Men's Health readers. Not a random population survey.

Anyway, running is more common than cycling and swimming put together and runners have a tendency to shave. They argue about it on forums. Blah blah it's disrespectful to turn up to a race with hairy sweaty legs, blah blah it's homosexual to shave your legs blah blah. Zzz. 

 

Usual trite crap. 

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to tritecommentbot | 7 years ago
9 likes

unconstituted wrote:

To be clear. It's a survey of image conscious Men's Health readers. Not a random population survey.

Anyway, running is more common than cycling and swimming put together and runners have a tendency to shave. They argue about it on forums. Blah blah it's disrespectful to turn up to a race with hairy sweaty legs, blah blah it's homosexual to shave your legs blah blah. Zzz. 

 

Usual trite crap. 

From what I've seen of Men's Health, it seems to be targeted at gullible, insecure narcissists. Its aims appear to be to create a market for frivolous products by making men as unhappy with their looks as many women, thinking that all they need to do to achieve some kind of unrealistic ideal is to spend huge amounts of money on cosmetic and personal treatments. And of course they advertise plenty opportunities to do so...

The problem probably takes proper hold when non-hateful channels (e.g. road.cc?) begin reporting their nonsense as if it was normal and what everyone (at least everyone who is anyone) is doing. It isn't, so fuck off.

Avatar
FrankH replied to Dnnnnnn | 7 years ago
3 likes

Duncann wrote:

From what I've seen of Men's Health, it seems to be targeted at gullible, insecure narcissists. Its aims appear to be to create a market for frivolous products by making men as unhappy with their looks as many women, thinking that all they need to do to achieve some kind of unrealistic ideal is to spend huge amounts of money on cosmetic and personal treatments. And of course they advertise plenty opportunities to do so...

The problem probably takes proper hold when non-hateful channels (e.g. road.cc?) begin reporting their nonsense as if it was normal and what everyone (at least everyone who is anyone) is doing. It isn't, so fuck off.

Quite.

The cosmetics industry successfully convinced the better looking half of the population that they're ugly and need to buy their expensive products to disguise the fact. They recently realised that they had convinced only half the population so now they've set about the other half.

Latest Comments