Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Google patents pedestrian (and cyclist?) protecting sticky bonnet for self driving cars

Many injuries occur when person hit by car is thrown to ground

Google’s latest patent is a sort of human flypaper which would grip and hold pedestrians, and perhaps cyclists, in the event they were hit by one of the firm’s driverless cars. The idea is to keep the person hit from bouncing off the bonnet, meaning “both the vehicle and pedestrian may come to a more gradual stop than if the pedestrian bounces off the vehicle.”

The patent points out that many crash injuries are not cause by the initial collision, but from when the pedestrian is thrown from the car onto the ground.

Google’s idea is for "an adhesive layer positioned on the front end of the vehicle." This would bond the person to the front of the car so that they remained with it until it stopped.

A car with a sticky bonnet would of course raise more mundane problems relating to vehicle cleanliness, which is why Google envisages an eggshell-like layer covering the adhesive. That layer would shatter in the event of a collision.

Stanford School of Law professor and autonomous car expert Bryant Walker Smith told The Mercury News that even if the idea was somewhat bizarre, Google were to be applauded for at least considering the safety of people outside the vehicle.

"The idea that cars should be safe for people other than the ones in them is the next generation of automotive safety. Manufacturers have gotten remarkably good at protecting the occupants of the vehicle, but there's been much less attention to protecting the people outside. I applaud anybody for thinking, as they should, about people outside of the vehicle."

Walker Smith did however point out that such an idea could bring problems of its own.

"If you had a pedestrian stuck on a car that then crashed into something else, that could be worse than if the pedestrian was thrown to the side or thrown over the car. It could also be better. It's very dependent on the chaos of the situation. The history of progress is replacing one set of problems with another set of problems and just really hoping that your new set of problems in aggregate is less than your original problem."

A Google spokeswoman said the existence of a patent doesn't necessarily mean a new product is on the way. "We hold patents on a variety of ideas. Some of those ideas later mature into real products and services, some don't."

Other recent Google patents relating to driverless technology have included a way for its vehicles to recognise cyclists' hand signals and technology that would see vehicles logging the location of major flaws in the road surface before uploading that information to the cloud to form a giant, constantly-updated, pothole database.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

7 comments

Avatar
bikebot | 7 years ago
3 likes

I believe the patent can be contested due to prior art.

//i.imgur.com/QxdSOwR.jpg)

 

Avatar
rnick | 7 years ago
2 likes

What an excellent idea...assuming the pesky cyclist's body (or those parts which have adhered) are not obscuring the view, the driver can continue without a delay in their journey.  Could be a bugger to get the flies off the paintwork though....

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 7 years ago
3 likes

Apparently they are already testing some early prototypes in New South Wales.

 

Avatar
handlebarcam | 7 years ago
2 likes
Quote:

A Google spokeswoman said, "We hold patents on a variety of ideas. Some of those ideas later mature into real products and services, some don't."

...and some are held on file, so that when Google morphs into Skynet, and self-driving cars turn into HKs, they'll have an effective human-capturing technology ready to use?

Avatar
The _Kaner | 7 years ago
0 likes

I am having nightmares....

Avatar
nowasps | 7 years ago
1 like

That is hilarious. 

Avatar
steviemarco | 7 years ago
0 likes

Is it April 1st already?

Latest Comments