Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

London Zoo opposes cycle superhighway – says gate closures will make it "extremely difficult" for visitors and deliveries

Nearby gates will remain open

ZSL London Zoo has registered its opposition to Cycle Superhighway 11 (CS11) on the grounds that the proposed closure and timing restrictions of Macclesfield Gate would make things ‘extremely difficult’ for visitors arriving by car or coach as well as for those making deliveries.

CS11 is proposed to run from Swiss Cottage to the West End via Regent’s Park. It has received strong opposition in some quarters with London Cycling Commissioner, Andrew Gilligan, last week telling road.cc: “Genuinely I think people have fundamentally misunderstood what’s happening here. What we’re seeing is a lot of opposition to things we’re not actually proposing.”

A statement on the ZSL London Zoo website reads:

“As an international conservation charity, we always encourage use of transport options that reduce our environmental impact.  Most of our visitors use public transport and we have two Santander Cycle stations at ZSL London Zoo.

“Some of our visitors, like school children, have to rely on cars or coaches. The closure and timing restrictions of Macclesfield Gate for the proposed cycle super highway would make it extremely difficult for these visitors and crucial deliveries, including animal feed, to get to ZSL London Zoo, and as such we have registered an opposition to the proposal because of the proposed gate restrictions.

“The revenue generated from all visitors at ZSL London Zoo helps to fund our charitable worldwide work for wildlife and we want to make sure all of our visitors are able to access the Zoo easily. ZSL London Zoo is keen to work with TFL to find an alternative solution that works for all.”

Mark Treasure of campaign group The Cycling Embassy of Great Britain tweeted to point out that the zoo would remain easily accessible under the plans.

 

 

In response to that tweet, others have said that Macclesfield Gate is closed to coaches already.

Responding to suggestions that the new road layout would lead to longer journey times, Andrew Gilligan told road.cc that return journeys would actually be shorter without the gyratory.

"This scheme will turn Regents Park from a traffic rat run back into a park. It will remove the hideous gyratory at Swiss Cottage and replace it with a public space outside the library, and it won’t even slow motorists down.

“If you go on the TfL website, it shows that southbound journeys on the Finchley Road will be ten minutes quicker, at least, because you won’t have to go around the gyratory, and then in the northbound direction it won’t be more than two minutes slower – so overall, anyone who makes a return journey on the Finchley Road, even in a car, will benefit from this scheme."

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

17 comments

Avatar
harman_mogul | 8 years ago
0 likes

ZSL's opposition to the proposed gate closure in the Park is vexing and mendacious.

Avatar
fixit | 8 years ago
2 likes

Is this a joke from zsl?? there a re million ways to enter, what is wrong with them? Oh I know, the cyclists...

Avatar
emishi55 | 8 years ago
6 likes

Objectors begin legal proceedings against Transport for London's CS11 cycle superhighway

CAMPAIGNERS have launched a legal challenge against Transport for London over its hugely divisive “cycling super highway”.

A “letter before claim” has been sent to transport chiefs after a six week consultation on its CS11 designs, which would rip up the Swiss Cottage gyratory and create a safer cycle route to the West End, closed yesterday (Sunday).

Adam Chapman, head of public law at City firm Kingsley Napier, has been appointed to bring the case a “newly-formed coalition of north London business owners and residents” from Swiss Cottage, Hampstead, St. John’s Wood, Primrose Hill, Regent’s Park and Belsize Park.

 

Looks as if the zoo's been got at. The NW3 motormouth mob, are afraid of the 'effect of pollution' the scheme 'will bring' to their pollution-free and rat-run-free neighbourhood. (almost as scary as losing their park rat-run).

The zoo is behaving disgracefully. They've already taken out covered cycle parking stands and given them over to motor cyclists.

Cyclists 'know your place'.

 

 

 

 

 

Avatar
redhanded replied to emishi55 | 8 years ago
2 likes
emishi55 wrote:

CAMPAIGNERS have launched a legal challenge against Transport for London over its hugely divisive “cycling super highway”.

I wouldn't worry too much about this.  TfL/London boroughs have plenty of recent experience of legal claims against cycle and road re-configuration schemes and have won each case.  The legal judgements for these cases provides useful additional guidance for TfL as well.

So TfL's lawyers have lots of practice ensuring that everything is legally squeaky clean and if they haven't done this, then they deserve to lose.

It would actually be good if the objectors did proceed with a legal challenge because they would have to put their money where their mouth is and pay for it, then it would be poetic justice if they lost and the judge awarded costs against them as happened to the objectors in Waltham Forest.

Avatar
Awavey | 8 years ago
4 likes

the Macclesfield bridge gate doesnt allow coaches, because the bridge over the canal there has a 3 ton weight limit, so delivery lorries arent going to be allowed across it either at the moment.

please tell me someone at TfL fact checks these spurious objections, and then sends a bill to the objectee for wasting their time.

Avatar
Stumps | 8 years ago
6 likes

As someone who has lived in Kenya and visited numerous game parks in other African countries i find all zoo's disgusting habitats and regardless of how well they are run its not a natural habitat for the animal.

So in the end no amount of whinging by the people who run the zoo will have any effect on me.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Stumps | 8 years ago
0 likes
AWPeleton wrote:

As someone who has lived in Kenya and visited numerous game parks in other African countries i find all zoo's disgusting habitats and regardless of how well they are run its not a natural habitat for the animal.

So in the end no amount of whinging by the people who run the zoo will have any effect on me.

I agree but there's also a case for important conservation work done by zoos (not necessarily all zoos though). Zoos may be a necessary evil to introduce more people to the amazing creatures sharing the world with us and make more people think about the dwindling habitats.

It does sound like a suspiciously politically motivated whinge to me as zoos are usually scrabbling for money.

Avatar
Sharpie replied to Stumps | 8 years ago
2 likes

As someone who has worked at the institution in question, I suggest you do a bit more research into the conservation initiatives run by ZSL. Some of the animals maintained within the collection exist only because of the work done there and in similar zoos. Seeing as the zoo receives no government support, visitor revenues fund the projects directly.

AWPeleton wrote:

As someone who has lived in Kenya and visited numerous game parks in other African countries i find all zoo's disgusting habitats and regardless of how well they are run its not a natural habitat for the animal.

So in the end no amount of whinging by the people who run the zoo will have any effect on me.

Avatar
Stumps replied to Sharpie | 8 years ago
1 like
Sharpie wrote:

As someone who has worked at the institution in question, I suggest you do a bit more research into the conservation initiatives run by ZSL. Some of the animals maintained within the collection exist only because of the work done there and in similar zoos. Seeing as the zoo receives no government support, visitor revenues fund the projects directly.

AWPeleton wrote:

As someone who has lived in Kenya and visited numerous game parks in other African countries i find all zoo's disgusting habitats and regardless of how well they are run its not a natural habitat for the animal.

So in the end no amount of whinging by the people who run the zoo will have any effect on me.

 

I did some reasearch as you mentioned and the Zoological Society London does some grand work but not in the zoo. Its all out and about. Dont get me wrong i dislike marine parks and all the razzmatazz that goes with sea life centres as well.

More effort should be made to protect the animals / birds etc habitat. For example a Gorilla covers an area of between 3 - 15km squared, not a small enclosure.............i could go on but this forum is not the time or place, sorry.

Avatar
zanf replied to Sharpie | 8 years ago
0 likes
AWPeleton wrote:

As someone who has lived in Kenya and visited numerous game parks in other African countries i find all zoo's disgusting habitats and regardless of how well they are run its not a natural habitat for the animal.

So in the end no amount of whinging by the people who run the zoo will have any effect on me.

Sharpie wrote:

As someone who has worked at the institution in question, I suggest you do a bit more research into the conservation initiatives run by ZSL. Some of the animals maintained within the collection exist only because of the work done there and in similar zoos. Seeing as the zoo receives no government support, visitor revenues fund the projects directly.

Funding their establishment by running Friday evenings where drunk people taunt the animals & pour drinks on them or where the various animal handlers glass each other?

Sounds like a rosy place!

Avatar
LarryDavidJr replied to zanf | 8 years ago
0 likes
zanf wrote:
AWPeleton wrote:

As someone who has lived in Kenya and visited numerous game parks in other African countries i find all zoo's disgusting habitats and regardless of how well they are run its not a natural habitat for the animal.

So in the end no amount of whinging by the people who run the zoo will have any effect on me.

Sharpie wrote:

As someone who has worked at the institution in question, I suggest you do a bit more research into the conservation initiatives run by ZSL. Some of the animals maintained within the collection exist only because of the work done there and in similar zoos. Seeing as the zoo receives no government support, visitor revenues fund the projects directly.

Funding their establishment by running Friday evenings where drunk people taunt the animals & pour drinks on them or where the various animal handlers glass each other?

Sounds like a rosy place!

I can't believe this is even a thing!  Get a grip London Zoo.

Avatar
Username | 8 years ago
8 likes

This is no surprise from an organisation that is struggling to operate in such a relatively small area, small when you consider what housing the animals in appropriate enclosures needs, yet manage to devote a large part of this precious land resource to their generous staff car park.

Avatar
turboprannet | 8 years ago
10 likes

Did anyone else apply the  Bill Bailey "speaking as a Mother" rule when they saw the statement started with "As an international conservation charity..." ?

Avatar
ibike | 8 years ago
13 likes

"Some of our visitors, like school children, have to rely on cars or coaches."

Aren't school children precisely who would benefit most from a safe segregated cycleway?

Avatar
fukawitribe replied to ibike | 8 years ago
1 like
ibike wrote:

"Some of our visitors, like school children, have to rely on cars or coaches."

Aren't school children precisely who would benefit most from a safe segregated cycleway?

On a school trip, almost certainly from outside central London ?

Avatar
Paul M replied to fukawitribe | 8 years ago
2 likes
fukawitribe wrote:
ibike wrote:

"Some of our visitors, like school children, have to rely on cars or coaches."

Aren't school children precisely who would benefit most from a safe segregated cycleway?

On a school trip, almost certainly from outside central London ?

Coaches Perhaps. Cars No.

Avatar
fukawitribe replied to Paul M | 8 years ago
1 like
Paul M wrote:
fukawitribe wrote:
ibike wrote:

"Some of our visitors, like school children, have to rely on cars or coaches."

Aren't school children precisely who would benefit most from a safe segregated cycleway?

On a school trip, almost certainly from outside central London ?

Coaches Perhaps. Cars No.

Indeed, that was the main point I think.

Latest Comments