Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Calls for London’s safer lorries scheme to be applied nationwide

Family of cyclist killed by HGV say that more can be done

After new rules came into effect demanding that all heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) operating in London be fitted with certain safety equipment, campaigners elsewhere have questioned why the rules should not apply nationwide.

All HGVS operating within the capital must now be fitted with side guards to prevent cyclists being dragged underneath, as well as mirrors that give the driver an improved view of the area around their vehicle. However, vehicles which do not meet these standards are still free to operate elsewhere in the country.

Nick Hubble, of Greater Manchester Cycling Campaign, told the Manchester Evening News that he would like to see the law applied nationwide.

“If these bigger construction trucks are deemed dangerous in London they should be deemed dangerous everywhere. When construction trucks are manoeuvred on a site they have to have a ‘banksman’ who looks out for people in the area and will warn if it’s getting too close.

“If they aren’t deemed to be safe on a construction site why are they allowed on the road without extra supervision? The law should apply universally and not just in London.”

However, a Transport for Greater Manchester spokesman said there are no immediate plans to follow London’s lead.

Meanwhile, the sister of a cyclist killed by a lorry while cycling to work in the capital in 2009 has welcomed the new rules but emphasised that there was still much to be done.

Eilidh Cairns, who worked as a TV producer, was aged 30 when she was killed after being struck from behind by a lorry driven by Joao Lopes. The only charge he ever faced in connection with her death was driving with uncorrected defective vision, for which he received three points on his licence and a fine of £200. Lopes was later jailed for killing an elderly pedestrian.

Eilidh’s sister, Kate, set-up the See Me Save Me campaign with her mother in the wake of her sister’s death. On top of the new measures, she wants to see mandatory specifications in lorry cab designs that would increase visibility and reduce blind spots. She told the Chronicle Live: “We do feel like we have to keep going. We are still going to be calling for compulsory driver training and a specialist investigatory body. There’s still a long way to go.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

9 comments

Avatar
JayBee | 8 years ago
0 likes

The original article from one of the newspapers was posted on ""South West Truckers" page on Facebook, it was met with the usual barrage of "stupid f*cking cyclists" etc etc

It amazes me how people who react in this way fail to realise that the person on the bike is another human being.

Sadly its a closed group otherwise I'm sure they would welcome some new comments!!

Avatar
Tony | 8 years ago
0 likes
Avatar
danthomascyclist | 8 years ago
0 likes

I don't understand why this is even a big deal and up for discussion.

Mandate that HGV operators have proper mirrors, let them have a whinge about having to invest a couple of hundred quid per vehicle, then move on with our lives knowing that all road users are safer as a result.

Avatar
brooksby replied to danthomascyclist | 8 years ago
0 likes
danthomascyclist wrote:

I don't understand why this is even a big deal and up for discussion.

Mandate that HGV operators have proper mirrors, let them have a whinge about having to invest a couple of hundred quid per vehicle, then move on with our lives knowing that all road users are safer as a result.

Exactly. The powers that be have the, er, power to make laws. On a safety issue like this the only explanation for not mandating this stuff nationwide is that they don't want to. I imagine that a freight industry lobbyist explained that spending this would harm the sacred profit margin... To be generous, we could think of London as a great big Petri dish to see whether it's feasible to roll it out to the rest of the country (if the freight operators don't go bust in London then it *is* feasible...)

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 8 years ago
0 likes

I don't understand how lorries are allowed on public roads without sufficient visibility around them. Wouldn't a car fail an MOT if it didn't have functioning mirrors?

Avatar
Scoob_84 | 8 years ago
0 likes

Could you imagine the uproar if TfL, GLA or Boris Johnson automatically changed the rules of the road in Greater Manchester without first consulting them. This is a Transport for Greater Manchester issue i'm afraid.

Avatar
Paul_C replied to Scoob_84 | 8 years ago
0 likes
Scoob_84 wrote:

Could you imagine the uproar if TfL, GLA or Boris Johnson automatically changed the rules of the road in Greater Manchester without first consulting them. This is a Transport for Greater Manchester issue i'm afraid.

actually it's an issue for the DfT... then it can be imposed nationwide from on top... it only came about in London because the DfT was taking too long and people were dying...

Avatar
ianrobo | 8 years ago
0 likes

and Nick Hubble has it spot on ...

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 8 years ago
0 likes

Absolutely it should be applied nationwide.
Anything that protects human beings from being injured or killed is good.

Latest Comments