Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

SW London road rage meltdown driver apologises, while cyclist reveals he was clipped by wing mirror

Cyclist says he regrets his own actions during the argument, which he says don't show him in a good light...

The road rage meltdown driver filmed in Roehampton, South West London, during a long tirade threatening to kill a cyclist for not using a cycle path has apologised for his "unacceptable" behaviour. Meanwhile, the bike rider involved has told road.cc the motorist clipped him with his wing mirror as he tried to pass.

The driver, identified yesterday as cafe owner and father of two, Jason Wells, apparently misjudged overtaking the cyclist on Priory Road near Richmond Park on 14 March before squeezing in toward the hedge. Wells was yesterday issued with a public order fine of £90.

The victim of road rage attack, who wants to be known only as Michael, told road.cc Wells hit him with the Land Rover Discovery's wing mirror during the close overtake, and says he is disappointed with the £90 fine. He also regrets his own anger during the four minute long expletive-laden argument caught on his bike-mounted camera. Since footage was released on Sunday the video has had almost 120,000 hits.

Wells, who apparently trained as a master butcher, is reported by the Evening Standard as saying: “I would like to apologise for any offence caused. My behaviour was unacceptable and regardless of the situation, I shouldn’t react like that.

“I fully appreciate that cyclists have as much right to the road as any other road users.”

Wells' south west London business, the Brew café chain, with outlets in Clapham, Putney, Wandsworth and Wimbledon, was popular with cyclists, but  now faces a boycott from the cycling community.

Michael was cycling to Richmond Park on Saturday 14 March for some exercise when the incident occured. He told road.cc he regrets his own anger during the argument.

"I'm not happy the way I reacted, I was extremely angry and at one point - you can hear in the video - I am so angry I can't even get my words out properly," he said.

"It doesn't show me in a good light."

"The last time [Wells] gets out he's angry because the mirror is bent right in, because he hit me with it. When he squeezed me for space I'm lucky I didn't hit the kerb and come off completely."

"He was seriously angry. I have never seen anyone get that angry and not act on it. He messed up the overtake then he tried to force me off. He feels I have violated his property because I have tapped his car."

Michael praised the police for spending two hours going through his video footage with him, but said the law fails to protect cyclists adequately.

He said: "I was a bit disappointed with the fine, because I'm pretty sure he can afford it."

While Wells is seen yelling at a number of people on bikes during the tirade for not using a shared-use path on the opposite footway, Michael said cyclists would only use it if they were "really tired or a small child".

He said that none of the cyclists heading to Richmond Park via Priory Lane would use that cycle path "because you have to cross a lane of traffic to get onto it, which means you have to hold up a lane of traffic."

He said: "It has happened before at almost the exact same spot. It is pretty much the same issue - the cars get held up by cyclists going up that small incline, they try to overtake and they make a mess of it and push you out of the way."

Although Michael, who wouldn't give any more details for fear of reprisals, was clearly unnerved by the incident, he remains philosophical.

"It is just one of those things - it has happened before, and it's probably going to happen again: someone is going to take displeasure with me, they believe I am impeding their route but as long as I have got a camera, I can document the event."

He said: "The main reason I went to the police was I didn't want it to happen to someone else - if he does it to someone else and they stop riding - I don't want that to happen."

Michael says the cyclist who intervenes in the argument was contacted by police as a witness but didn't come back.

A Metropolitan Police spokesperson said: "Officers from the Putney Safer Neighbourhood  Team investigating an incident which took place on 14 March near Priory Lane, SW5 involving a cyclist and the driver of a vehicle issued a 50-year old man with a public order PND (Police Notice Disorder) fine of £90 on Monday 1 June.

"The fine was issued after the man voluntarily attended a south London police station where he was interviewed in connection with the incident. He was not arrested."

Add new comment

74 comments

Avatar
Leodis | 8 years ago
0 likes

The best thing to come out of this was the fact this driver has a child size willy and its been posted across the interweb.

Avatar
DaveE128 | 8 years ago
0 likes

Well, at least it isn't a politician's "apology". I suspect that only the threat of boycotts led to it though, which is a shame.  7

Avatar
Accessibility f... | 8 years ago
0 likes

Not sorry for the shit driving. Very sorry he was caught and is being publicly humiliated.

He's learnt nothing. He'll still drive like an idiot. And if Twitter is to be believed, he's allegedly an abusive employer and enjoys the odd bit of cocaine. And he allegedly posts pictures of his rather small genitalia.

Zero sympathy.

Avatar
jacknorell replied to Accessibility for all | 8 years ago
0 likes
Peowpeowpeowlasers wrote:

Not sorry for the shit driving. Very sorry he was caught and is being publicly humiliated.

He's learnt nothing. He'll still drive like an idiot. And if Twitter is to be believed, he's allegedly an abusive employer and enjoys the odd bit of cocaine. And he allegedly posts pictures of his rather small genitalia.

Zero sympathy.

Exactly.

Avatar
BikeBud | 8 years ago
0 likes

The Facebook page for Brew Cafe is hilarious - particularly the recent reviews!

Avatar
RoadRev replied to BikeBud | 8 years ago
0 likes

"Brave lad in a Range Rover. Dressed like cat woman"  21

Avatar
BikeBud | 8 years ago
0 likes

To be fair, I've tended to get "a bit shouty" when someone has nearly knocked me off my bike.

Who knows, Mr Wells might be a little more in touch with reality in future. I hope so.

Avatar
rggfddne replied to BikeBud | 8 years ago
0 likes
BikeBud wrote:

To be fair, I've tended to get "a bit shouty" when someone has nearly knocked me off my bike.

Who knows, Mr Wells might be a little more in touch with reality in future. I hope so.

+1.

We wonder why arguments get so shouty and no one takes responsibility - well, here you go. He has. Should we really not be rewarding that?

Apparently not.

It's just getting off on kicking someone while they're down now.

Avatar
PaulBox replied to rggfddne | 8 years ago
0 likes
nuclear coffee wrote:

We wonder why arguments get so shouty and no one takes responsibility - well, here you go. He has. Should we really not be rewarding that?

Apparently not.

It's just getting off on kicking someone while they're down now.

He has "taken responsibility" via a half arsed apology, I'm sure he only did that because of the kicking.

I think this is continuing because people feel that £90 and a slap on the wrist is not sufficient for driving in to a cyclist on purpose.

Avatar
PaulBox | 8 years ago
0 likes

WTF didn't the police do him for a motoring offence? £90 is nothing to this tool...

Avatar
nicholassmith replied to PaulBox | 8 years ago
0 likes
PaulBox wrote:

WTF didn't the police do him for a motoring offence? £90 is nothing to this tool...

It'll be easier to make the public order charge stick than a motoring offence, which requires a more drawn out process of court cases etc.

Avatar
kraut replied to nicholassmith | 8 years ago
0 likes

It'll be easier to make the public order charge stick than a motoring offence, which requires a more drawn out process of court cases etc.
Fair point, but a public order offence isn't going to get dangerous drivers off the road. The cops should do both!

Avatar
sunDOG | 8 years ago
0 likes

One rather suspects this incident is going to cost Mr Wells a little more than the £90 fine in terms of lost revenues at his Brew cafes, and impact on his personal reputation.

Avatar
PaulBox replied to sunDOG | 8 years ago
0 likes
sunDOG wrote:

One rather suspects this incident is going to cost Mr Wells a little more than the £90 fine in terms of lost revenues at his Brew cafes, and impact on his personal reputation.

Good!!!

Pages

Latest Comments